Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Paclitaxel in a novel formulation containing less Cremophor EL as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer: A phase II trial

  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Paclitaxel (Taxol) is formulated in 50% Cremophor EL (CrEL)/absolute ethanol for clinical use. In order to reduce vehicle-related side effects, Genetaxyl was developed to have paclitaxel formulated in a solution containing lesser amounts of CrEL and ethanol plus 2 other solvents. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Genetaxyl as first-line therapy to treat breast cancer patients. Patients with newly diagnosed stage III (N = 8) or IV (N = 10), or recurrent (N = 11) breast cancer received single-agent Genetaxyl at 175 mg/m2 administered in a 3-h infusion every 3 weeks for 3–6 cycles. A total of 148 cycles were delivered to 29 patients. The overall response rate was 41.4% (95% confidence interval, 23.4 to 59.2%), and that of patients with metastatic disease (N = 20) was 30%. Median survival for all patients was 32.4 months and 24.3 months for patients having metastatic disease. The toxicity profile seems favorable, especially regarding myelosuppression and myalgia/arthralgia. No severe hypersensitivity reaction occurred. These phase II trial results demonstrate that a 60% reduction of CrEL by Genetaxyl’s formulation does not affect the activity of paclitaxel and could allow for better control of several CrEL-related toxicities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kintzel PK: Prophylaxis for paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions. Ann Pharmacother 35: 1114–1117, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eisenhauer EA, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, Swenerton KD, Gianni L, Myles J, van der Burg ME, Kerr I, Vermorken JB, Buser K, Colombo N, Bacon M, Santabarbara P, Onetto N, Winograd B, Canetta R: European-Canadian randomized trial of paclitaxel in relapsed ovarian cancer: High dose versus low-dose and long versus short infusion. J Clin Oncol 12: 2654–2666, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sparreboom A, van Tellingen O, Nooijen W, Beijnen JH: Nonlinear pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in mice results from the pharmaceutical vehicle Cremophor EL. Cancer Res 56: 2112–2115, 1996

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sparreboom A, van Zuylen L, Brouwer E, Loos WJ, de Bruijn P, Gelderblom H, Pillay M, Nooter K, Stoter G, Verweij J: Cremophor EL-mediated alteration of paclitaxel distribution in human blood: clinical pharmacokinetic implications. Cancer Res 59: 1454–1457, 1999

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Tellingen O, Huizing MT, Nannan Panday VR, Schellens JHM, Nooijen WJ, Beijnen JH: Cremophor EL causes (pseudo-) non-linear pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in patients. Br J Cancer 81: 330–335, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  6. Millward MJ, Webster LK, Rischin D, Stokes KH, Toner GC, Bishop JF, Olver IN, Linahan BM, Linsenmeyer ME, Woodcock DM: Phase I trial of Cremophor EL with bolus doxorubicin. Clin Cancer Res 4: 2321–2329, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  7. Southern Research Institute: Final Report of Non-GLP experiment of comparative toxicity and dose range-finding study of BMS and GBL formulations in Sprague-Dawley rats. September 1997

  8. Southern Research Institute: Final Report of GLP experiment of comparative toxicity and dose range-finding study of BMS and GBL formulations in Sprague-Dawley rats. January 20, 1998

  9. Southern Research Institute: Final Report of the Comparison of the Antitumor Activities of Genelabs Paclitaxel Formulation and Bristol-Myers Squibb Taxol¯ against SL Implanted Human MX-1 Mammary Tumor Xenografts. July 1996

  10. Henderson IC, Berry DA, Demetri GD, Cirrincione CT, Goldstein LJ, Martino S, Ingle JN, Cooper MR, Hayes DF, Tkaczuk KH, Fleming G, Holland JF, Duggan DB, Carpenter JT, Frei E 3rd, Schilsky RL, Wood WC, Muss HB, Norton L: Improved outcomes from adding sequential paclitaxel but not from escalating doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 21: 976–983, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davidson NG: Single-agent paclitaxel as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer: the British experience. Semin Oncol 23(5 Suppl 11): 6–10, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  12. Perez EA: Paclitaxel in Breast Cancer. Oncologist 3: 378–389, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  13. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A: Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47: 207–214, 1981

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Simon R: Optimal two-stage design for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 10: 1–10, 1989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hortobagyi GN, Holmes FA. Single-agent paclitaxel for the treatment of breast cancer: an overview. Semin Oncol 23(1 Suppl 1): 4–9, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dorr RT: Pharmacology and toxicology of Cremophor EL. Ann Pharmacother 28: S11–S14, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  17. Woodcock DM, Jefferson S, Linsenmeyer ME, Crowther PJ, Chojnowski GM, Williams B, Bertoncello I: Reversal of the multidrug resistance phenotype with Cremophor EL, a common vehicle for water insoluble vitamins and drugs. Cancer Res 50: 4199–4203, 1990

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sparreboom A, Verweij J, van der Burg MEL: Disposition of Cremophor EL in humans limits the potential for modulation of the multidrug resistance phenotype in vivo. Clin Cancer Res 4: 1937–1942, 1998

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gelderblom H, Verweij J, Nooter K, Sparreboom A: Cremophor EL: the drawbacks and advantages of vehicle selection for drug formulation. Eur J Cancer 37: 1590–1598, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fountzilas G, Athanassiades A, Giannakakis T, Bafaloukos D, Karakousis K, Dombros N, Kosmidis P, Skarlos D: A Phase II Study of Paclitaxel in Advanced Breast Cancer Resistant to Anthracyclines. Eur J Cancer, 32A: 47–51, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  21. Michael M, Bishop JF, Levi JA, Bell DR, Zalcberg JR, Friedlander ML, Olver IN, Smith JG, Toner GC: Australian multicenter phase II trial of paclitaxel in women with metastatic breast cancer and prior chemotherapy. Med J Aust 166: 520–523, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kwon JS, Elit L, Finn M, Hirte H, Mazurka J, Moens F, Trim K: A comparison of two prophylactic regimes for hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel. Gynecol Oncol 84: 420–425, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  23. van Zuylen L, Verweij J, Sparreboom A: Role of formulation vehicles in taxane pharmacology. Invest New Drugs 19: 125–141, 2001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Blum JL, Beveridge R, Robert N, Edelman G, Carrasco S, O’Shaughnessy J: ABI-007 nanoparticle paclitaxel: demonstration of anti-tumor activity in taxane-refractory metastatic breast cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22: 17, 2003 (Abstract 64)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Norton MS, Neubauer M, Harper H, Bolton MG: Phase 2 study of first line chemotherapy using CT-2103 in patients with non-small-cell-lung cancer who are > 70 years of gage or performance status (PS) = 2. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22: 653, 2003 (Abstract 2626)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen Po-Min.

Additional information

Taxol is a trademark of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ta-Chung, C., Zyting, C., Ling-Ming, T. et al. Paclitaxel in a novel formulation containing less Cremophor EL as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer: A phase II trial. Invest New Drugs 23, 171–177 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-005-5863-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-005-5863-8

Key words

Navigation