Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Correction to: Doc Ophthalmol https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-021-09857-5
In the published article, there are few changes requested by the author. The changes are as follows:
In section “Multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) and its responses in myopia”—last sentence of 2nd paragraph should read as:
“In humans, the N1 component primarily originates from the ON- and OFF-cone bipolar cells with minimal contribution from the cone photoreceptors.”
In addition, the following figure captions and table footntoes should read as follows:
Figure 2: Panel A: The b-wave amplitudes plotted against the moderate (MM) and high myopia (HM) are those associated with moderate and advanced chorioretinal degeneration, respectively, within the group of pathological myopes (PM) studied [119]. Panel A and B: These older studies used non-standard stimuli, strong flashes in dark-adapted participants, and such amplitudes are more comparable to those in panels G and H dark-adapted ‘combined’ ERGs. Panel D: Should be labeled “Combined ERG” as Wan et al [122] used the ISCEV Standard dark-adapted 3.0 stimulus. A revised figure (2S) with corrected labels is available in the electronic supplemental material.
Figure 4: Panels E, H, and I: The y-axis in these panels is microvolt (µV), not conventional density units (nV/deg2). (The angular size of the stimulus elements for conversion to density are not available.)
Table 1: Several studies in this table used non-standard ERG protocols or extended protocols [119, 112, 113, 122]; The study by Ishikawa et al. [120] used a focal macular ERG protocol
Tables 1–3: Some details of the stimuli and participants are omitted from tables. Tables 1S, 2S and 3S in the electronic supplement include the omitted information to allow clearer comparisons between studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gupta, S.K., Chakraborty, R. & Verkicharla, P.K. Correction to: Electroretinogram responses in myopia: a review. Doc Ophthalmol 145, 97–98 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-022-09876-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-022-09876-w