Advertisement

Screening for diabetic retinopathy in diabetic patients with a mydriasis-free, full-field flicker electroretinogram recording device

  • Yunkao Zeng
  • Dan Cao
  • Dawei Yang
  • Xuenan Zhuang
  • Honghua Yu
  • Yunyan Hu
  • Yan Zhang
  • Cheng Yang
  • Miao He
  • Liang ZhangEmail author
Original Research Article
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the accuracy of the RETeval full-field flicker ERG in the screening of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR) and to determine a suitable range of DR diagnostic reference for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study involving 172 subjects with T2DM, including 71 subjects without clinically detectable DR (NDR), 25 subjects with mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), 24 subjects with moderate NPDR, 27 subjects with severe NPDR and 25 subjects with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). All the subjects underwent a full-field flicker ERG using the RETeval device (DR assessment protocol), which is a mydriasis-free, full-field electroretinogram (ERG) recording system. The performance of the DR assessment protocol in detecting the DR (including mild NPDR, moderate NPDR, severe NPDR and PDR) and VTDR was analyzed with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

For the detection of DR (mild NPDR, moderate NPDR, severe NPDR, PDR), the area under the ROC curve was 0.867 (p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.814–0.920), and the best cutoff value for DR was determined to be 20.75, with a sensitivity of 80.2% and specificity of 81.7%. Meanwhile, for the detection of VTDR, the area under the ROC curve was 0.965 (p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.941–0.989), and the best cutoff value was set to 23.05, with a sensitivity of 94.6% and a specificity of 88.8%.

Conclusion

The DR assessment protocol in RETeval device was effective in screening for DR (mild NPDR, moderate NPDR, severe NPDR, PDR) and VTDR in patients with diabetes. It could be helpful in referring and managing patients with T2DM in primary healthcare setting. However, caution should be taken that optimal cutoff value of DR assessment protocol may vary in different ethnic populations.

Keywords

Diabetic retinopathy Screening Electroretinogram Retinal diagnostic test 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (Grant Number B2018096), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 81800829). The sponsors or funding organizations had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Statement of human rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Statement on the welfare of animals

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee R, Wong TY, Sabanayagam C (2015) Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema and related vision loss. Eye Vis 2(1):17.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-015-0026-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wild SH, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H (2004) Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 27(5):1047–1053CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yau JWY, Rogers S, Kawasaki R, Lamoureux EL, Kowalski JW, Bek T, Chen S, Dekker JM, Fletcher AE, Grauslund J (2012) Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 35(3):556–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ting DSW, Cheung G, Wong TY (2016) Diabetic retinopathy: global prevalence, major risk factors, screening practices and public health challenges: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 44(4):260–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ting DSW, Pasquale LR, Peng L, Campbell JP, Lee AY, Raman R, Tan G, Schmetterer L, Keane PA, Wong TY (2019) Artificial intelligence and deep learning in ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol 103(2):167–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fukuo M, Kondo M, Hirose A, Fukushima H, Ikesugi K, Sugimoto M, Kato K, Uchigata Y, Kitano S (2016) Screening for diabetic retinopathy using new mydriasis-free, full-field flicker ERG recording device. Sci Rep 6(1):36591CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lawrence MG (2004) The accuracy of digital-video retinal imaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy: an analysis of two digital-video retinal imaging systems using standard stereoscopic seven-field photography and dilated clinical examination as reference standards. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 102:321–340PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maa AY, Feuer WJ, Davis CQ, Pillow EK, Brown TD, Caywood RM, Chasan JE, Fransen SR (2016) A novel device for accurate and efficient testing for vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy. J Diabetes Complicat 30(3):524–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Degirmenci MFK, Demirel S, Batioglu F, Ozmert E (2018) Role of a mydriasis-free, full-field flicker ERG device in the detection of diabetic retinopathy. Doc Ophthalmol 137(3):131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Basevi V (2011) Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 36:S67–S74Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wilkinson CP, Ferris FL, Klein R, Lee PP, Agardh C, Davis MD, Dills DG, Kampik A, Pararajasegaram R, Verdaguer J (2003) Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. Ophthalmology 110(9):1677–1682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grading Diabetic Retinopathy from Stereoscopic Color Fundus Photographs; An Extension of the Modified Airlie House Classification: ETDRS Report Number 10 (1991). Ophthalmology 98(5):786–806.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(13)38012-9
  13. 13.
    Kato K, Kondo M, Sugimoto M, Ikesugi K, Matsubara H (2015) Effect of pupil size on flicker ERGs recorded with RETeval system: new mydriasis-free full-field ERG system. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56(6):3684–3690.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-16349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Williams GA, Scott IU, Haller JA, Maguire AM, Marcus DM, Mcdonald HR (2004) Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 111(5):1055–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bursell S, Cavallerano JD, Cavallerano AA, Clermont AC, Birkmirepeters DP, Aiello LP, Aiello LM (2001) Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 108(3):572–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Szeto SKH, Wong R, Lok J, Tang F, Sun Z, Tso T, Lam TCH, Tham CC, Ng DS, Cheung CY (2018) Non-mydriatic ultrawide field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy compared with dilated fundal examination for assessment of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema in Chinese individuals with diabetes mellitus. Br J Ophthalmol.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-311924 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zeng Y, Cao D, Yu H, Yang D, Zhuang X, Hu Y, Li J, Yang J, Wu Q, Liu B, Zhang L (2019) Early retinal neurovascular impairment in patients with diabetes without clinically detectable retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313582 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pescosolido N, Barbato A, Stefanucci A, Buomprisco G (2015) Role of electrophysiology in the early diagnosis and follow-up of diabetic retinopathy. Exp Diabetes Res 2015:319692Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jain MK, Devan S, Jaisankar D, Swaminathan G, Pardhan S, Raman R (2018) Pupillary abnormalities with varying severity of diabetic retinopathy. Sci Rep 8(1):5636CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ng JS, Bearse MA, Schneck ME, Barez S, Adams AJ (2008) Local diabetic retinopathy prediction by multifocal ERG delays over 3 years. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49(4):1622–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harrison WW, Bearse MA, Ng JS, Jewell NP, Barez S, Burger D, Schneck ME, Adams AJ (2011) Multifocal electroretinograms predict onset of diabetic retinopathy in adult patients with diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52(2):772–777CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lakhani E, Wright TC, Abdolell M, Westall CA (2010) Multifocal ERG defects associated with insufficient long-term glycemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(10):5297–5303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yamamoto S, Takeuchi S, Kamiyama M (1997) The short wavelength-sensitive cone electroretinogram in diabetes: relationship to systemic factors. Doc Ophthalmol 94(3):193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Abdlseaed AA, Mctaggart Y, Ramage T, Hamilton R, Mcculloch DL (2010) Light- and dark-adapted electroretinograms (ERGs) and ocular pigmentation: comparison of brown- and blue-eyed cohorts. Doc Ophthalmol 121(2):135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wali N, Leguire LE (1993) Fundus pigmentation and the electroretinographic luminance-response function. Doc Ophthalmol 84(1):61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People’s HospitalGuangdong Academy of Medical SciencesGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Shantou University Medical CollegeShantouChina

Personalised recommendations