Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Electroretinogram and visual field changes in a case of birdshot chorioretinopathy

  • Clinical Case Report
  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This case report explores the role of the visual field perimetry and electroretinogram (ERG) in cases of non-infectious uveitis in the assessment and monitoring of retinal function and response to treatment.

Methods

A 59-year-old Caucasian female presenting with bilateral posterior uveitis newly diagnosed as birdshot chorioretinopathy (BSCR) presenting with bilateral decrease in visual acuity and cystoid macular edema, as well as a paracentral scotoma in the right eye. The diagnosis and follow-up of the case was done using visual field perimetry, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and ERG.

Results

Baseline ERG showed a marked decrease in the amplitudes of the scotopic and photopic responses and a delay of peak times mainly in the right eye. Mycophenolate mofetil at 2 g/day and oral prednisolone at 1 g/kg/day were administered with gradual tapering of the corticosteroids. After 5 months, there was a noticeable improvement in the visual acuity, macular edema in OCT, and an obvious increase in the amplitudes of the ERG associated with a decrease in peak times, particularly in the 30 Hz photopic 3.0 Flicker of the right eye.

Conclusion

This case report highlights the importance of the peak time and wave amplitudes of the 30 Hz photopic DA 3.0 Flicker as being a sensitive parameter in the diagnosis and follow-up of BSCR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Baddar D, Goldstein DA (2016) HLA-A29-positive birdshot chorioretinopathy in a Hispanic patient. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 24(1):110–112. doi:10.3109/09273948.2014.928733

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McCulloch DL, Marmor MF, Brigell MG, ISCEV Standards et al (2015) ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol 130:1. doi:10.1007/s10633-014-9473-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Oh KT, Christmas NJ, Folk JC (2002) Birdshot retinochoroiditis: long term follow-up of a chronically progressive disease. Am J Ophthalmol 133(5):622–629. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01350-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kiss S, Ahmed M, Letko E, Foster CS (2005) Long-term follow-up of patients with birdshot retinochoroidopathy treated with corticosteroid-sparing systemic immunomodulatory therapy. Ophthalmology 112(6):1066.e2–1071.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.12.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Holder GE, Robson AG, Pavesio C, Graham EM (2005) Electrophysiological characterisation and monitoring in the management of birdshot chorioretinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 89(6):709–718. doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.047837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Comander J, Loewenstein J, Sobrin L (2011) Diagnostic testing and disease monitoring in birdshot chorioretinopathy. Semin Ophthalmol 26(4–5):329–336. doi:10.3109/08820538.2011.588661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sobrin L, Lam BL, Liu M, Feuer WJ, Davis JL (2005) Electroretinographic monitoring in birdshot chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 140(1):52.e1–52.e18. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.01.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gordon LK, Goldhardt R, Holland GN, Yu F, Ralph D (2006) Standardized visual field assessment for patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy standardized visual field assessment for patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 3948:325–332. doi:10.1080/09273940600966400

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hisham Elbaz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria, educational grants, participation in speakers’ bureaus, membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest, and expert testimony or patent–licensing arrangements), nor non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Statement of human rights

All procedures studies involving human participants were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Statement on the welfare of animals

There were no tests on animals in this case report.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elbaz, H., Besgen, V., Rechberger, K. et al. Electroretinogram and visual field changes in a case of birdshot chorioretinopathy. Doc Ophthalmol 134, 149–153 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-017-9581-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-017-9581-2

Keywords

Navigation