Skip to main content
Log in

VEP analysis methods in children with optic nerve hypoplasia: relationship to visual acuity and optic disc diameter

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Assessing vision in young children with optic nerve hypoplasia (ONH) is challenging due to multi-directional infantile nystagmus, the range of optic nerve loss, and cognitive delay. This study examined visual evoked potential (VEP) responses and averaging techniques in children with ONH. The assumption is that EEG epochs with inconsistent temporal phase would be associated with nystagmus, signal reduction due to axon loss, and visual inattention.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed on 44 children (average age 2.2 years; SD 1.9). Optic disc diameter was estimated by ophthalmoscopy. Visual function was measured under binocular viewing and then compared to the eye with the larger optic disc to exclude secondary amblyopia. Visual acuity was measured by Teller cards or by recognition optotypes, and both measures were converted into log minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). VEPs were recorded to onset/offset of horizontal gratings and to reversing checkerboards. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were estimated from phase consistency across epochs in the Fourier domain. VEPs were also averaged after (1) correction of epochs for phase shifts across a limited bandwidth, or (2) selection of only epochs showing phase consistency.

Results

Optic disc diameter, logMAR, VEP amplitudes, and VEP SNR were all significantly inter-correlated. Optic disc diameter correlated best with VEP SNR (Spearman rho = 0.82; p < 0.001). Age-corrected logMAR correlated with optic disc diameter and VEP SNR (Spearman rho = −0.695 and 0.70, respectively; p < 0.001). VEP latency poorly correlated with optic disc diameter or logMAR. Correction of phase shifts or selection of epochs based on phase consistency significantly increased VEP amplitude and SNR for children with optic disc diameters <1000 microns. Correction of phase inconsistency did not improve the correlation of VEP parameters with optic disc diameter or with logMAR.

Conclusions

In ONH, the size of the optic nerve is correlated with VEP SNR and logMAR. The results imply a direct relationship between the reduction in optic nerve axons and generalized reduction in visual function. Our calculation of VEP SNR provides objective assessment of optic nerve function that is independent of subjective scoring of VEP peaks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hatton D, Schwietz E, Boyer B, Rychwalski P (2007) Babies count: the national registry for children with visual impairments, birth to 3 years. J AAPOS 11:351–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Walton DS, Robb RM (1970) Optic nerve hypoplasia: a report of 20 cases. Arch Ophthalmol 84:572–578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Frisen L, Holmegaard L (1978) Spectrum of optic nerve hypoplasia. Br J Ophthalmol 62:7–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Skarf B, Hoyt CS (1984) Optic nerve hypoplasia in children. Association with anomalies of the endocrine and CNS. Arch Ophthalmol 102:62–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hellstrom A, Wiklund LM, Svensson E (1999) The clinical and morphologic spectrum of optic nerve hypoplasia. J AAPOS 3:212–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor D (2007) Developmental abnormalities of the optic nerve and chiasm. Eye (Lond) 21:1271–1284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fink C, Vedin AM, Garcia-Filion P, Ma NS, Geffner ME, Borchert M (2012) Newborn thyroid-stimulating hormone in children with optic nerve hypoplasia: associations with hypothyroidism and vision. J AAPOS 16:418–423

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Provis JM, Van Driel D, Billson FA, Russel P (1985) Human fetal optic nerve: overproduction and elimination of retinal axons during development. J Comp Neurol 238:92–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zeki SM, Dutton GN (1990) Optic nerve hypoplasia in children. Br J Ophthalmol 74:300–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoyt CS, Good WV (1992) Do we really understand the difference between optic nerve hypoplasia and atrophy? Eye 6:201–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia-Filion P, Borchert M (2013) Optic nerve hypoplasia syndrome: a review of the epidemiology and clinical associations. Curr Treat Options Neurol 15:78–89

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Brennan D, Giles S (2014) Ocular involvement in fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: a review. Curr Pharm Des 20:5377–5387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas PQ, Dattani MT, Brickman JM et al (2001) Heterozygous HESX1 mutations associated with isolated congenital pituitary hypoplasia and septo-optic dysplasia. Hum Mol Genet 10:39–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang Z, Ding K, Pan L, Deng M, Gan L (2003) Math5 determines the competence state of retinal ganglion cell progenitors. Dev Biol 2003(264):240–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bejarano-Escobar R, Álvarez-Hernán G, Morona R, González A, Martín-Partido G, Francisco-Morcillo J (2015) Expression and function of the LIM-homeodomain transcription factor Islet-1 in the developing and mature vertebrate retina. Exp Eye Res 138:22–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Samuel A, Rubinstein AM, Azar TT, Ben-Moshe Livne Z, Kim SH, Inbal A (2016) Six3 regulates optic nerve development via multiple mechanisms. Sci Rep 6:20267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Macgregor S, Hewitt AW, Hysi PG et al (2010) Genome-wide association identifies ATOH7 as a major gene determining human optic disc size. Hum Mol Genet 19:2716–2724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Khor CC, Ramdas WD, Vithana EN et al (2011) Genome-wide association studies in Asians confirm the involvement of ATOH7 and TGFBR3, and further identify CARD10 as a novel locus influencing optic disc area. Hum Mol Genet 20:1864–1872

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Springelkamp H, Mishra A, Hysi PG et al (2015) Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies novel loci associated with optic disc morphology. Genet Epidemiol 39:207–216

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sprague JB, Wilson WB (1981) Electrophysiologic findings in bilateral optic nerve hypoplasia. Arch Ophthalmol 99:1028–1029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Borchert M, McCulloch D, Rother C, Stout AU (1995) Clinical assessment, optic disk measurements, and visual-evoked potential in optic nerve hypoplasia. Am J Ophthalmol 120:605–612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weiss AH, Kelly JP (2003) Acuity, ophthalmoscopy, and visually evoked potentials in the prediction of visual outcome in infants with bilateral optic nerve hypoplasia. J AAPOS 7:108–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McCulloch DL, Garcia-Filion P, Fink C, Chaplin CA, Borchert MS (2010) Clinical electrophysiology and visual outcome in optic nerve hypoplasia (ONH). Br J Ophthalmol 94:1017–1023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Odom JV, Bach M, Brigell M, Holder GE, McCulloch DL, Mizota A, Tormene AP (2016) ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials: (2016 update. Doc Ophthalmol 133:1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weiss AH, Kelly JP, Phillips JO (2011) Relationship of slow-phase velocity to visual acuity in infantile nystagmus associated with albinism. J AAPOS 15:33–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Arlt A, Zangemeister WH (1990) Influence of slow eye movements and nystagmus on pattern induced visual evoked potentials. Neuro-Ophthalmology 10:241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Saunders KJ, Brown G, McCulloch DL (1998) Pattern-onset visual evoked potentials: more useful than reversal for patients with nystagmus. Doc Ophthalmol 94:265–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoffmann MB, Seufert PS, Bach M (2004) Simulated nystagmus suppresses pattern-reversal but not pattern-onset visual evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 115:2659–2665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuba M, Kubova Z, Kremláček J, Langrova J (2007) Motion-onset VEPs: characteristics, methods, and diagnostic use. Vis Res 47:189–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gur M, Beylin A, Snodderly DM (1997) Response variability of neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) of alert monkeys. J Neurosci 17:2914–2920

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thornton ARD (2008) Evaluation of a technique to measure latency jitter in event-related potentials. J Neurosci Methods 168:248–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kremláček J, Hulan M, Kuba M, Kubová Z, Langrová J, Vít F, Szanyi J (2012) Role of latency jittering correction in motion-onset VEP amplitude decay during prolonged visual stimulation. Doc Ophthalmol 124:211–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kelly JP, Darvas F, Weiss AH (2014) Waveform variance and latency jitter of the visual evoked potential in childhood. Doc Ophthalmol 128:1–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kelly JP, Crognale MA, Weiss AH (2003) ERGs, cone-isolating VEPs and analytical techniques in children with cone dysfunction syndromes. Doc Ophthalmol 106:289–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mezer E, Bahir Y, Leibu R, Perlman I (2004) Effect of defocusing and of distracted attention upon recordings of the visual evoked potential. Doc Ophthalmol 109:229–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jonas JB, Schmidt AM, Muller-Bergh JA, Schlötzer-Schrehardt UM, Naumann GO (1992) Human optic nerve fiber count and optic disc size. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:2012–2018

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Quigley HA, Coleman AL, Dorman-Pease ME (1991) Larger optic nerve heads have more nerve fibers in normal monkey eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 109:1441–1443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Saadati HG, Hsu HY, Heller KB, Sadun AA (1998) A histopathologic and morphometric differentiation of nerves in optic nerve hypoplasia and Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol 116:911–916

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The Peter LeHaye, Barbara Anderson, and William O. Rogers Endowment Funds provided financial support in the form of an unrestricted grant. The sponsor had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John P. Kelly.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 479 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kelly, J.P., Phillips, J.O. & Weiss, A.H. VEP analysis methods in children with optic nerve hypoplasia: relationship to visual acuity and optic disc diameter. Doc Ophthalmol 133, 159–169 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-016-9566-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-016-9566-6

Keywords

Navigation