Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of shorter dark adaptation on ISCEV standard DA 0.01 and DA 3 skin ERGs in healthy adults

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To quantify dark-adapted (DA) skin ERG changes during 20 min of dark adaptation.

Methods

Sixteen healthy adult subjects were dark-adapted for 20 min during which ISCEV standard dim (0.01 phot cd s m−2) white flash ERGs were recorded at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15 and 20 min, and bright (3 phot cd s m−2) white ERGs were recorded at 2, 5, 10, 15 and 20 min without mydriasis and using skin electrodes. Amplitudes and peak times were normalised to 20 min values.

Results

Halving dark adaptation from 20 to 10 min had no measureable effect on the DA 3 ERG and caused a 10 % amplitude loss (range 0–23 %) only for the DA 0.01 ERG b-wave amplitude. No significant peak time changes resulted, nor increased parameter variability.

Conclusion

Reducing dark adaptation from 20 to 10 min or even less has an effect on only DA 0.01 ERGs. Shorter dark adaptation than 20 min may not compromise the clinical utility of the ERG providing clinics adhere to the usual standards of adequate reference data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marmor MF, Arden GB, Nilsson SEG, Zrenner E (1989) Standard for clinical electroretinography: international standardization committee. Arch Ophthalmol 107:816. doi:10.1001/archopht.1989.01070010838024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Marmor MF, Zrenner E (1995) Standard for clinical electroretinography (1994 update). Doc Ophthalmol 89:199–210. doi:10.1007/bf01203373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marmor MF, Zrenner E (1998) Standard for clinical electroretinography (1999 update). Doc Ophthalmol 97:143–156. doi:10.1023/a:1002016531591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marmor MF, Holder GE, Seeliger MW, Yamamoto S (2004) Standard for clinical electroretinography (2004 update). Doc Ophthalmol 108:107–114. doi:10.1023/b:doop.0000036793.44912.45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marmor MF, Fulton AB, Holder GE, Miyake Y, Brigell M, Bach M (2009) Standard for clinical electroretinography (2008 update). Doc Ophthalmol 118:69–77. doi:10.1007/s10633-008-9155-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McCulloch DL, Marmor MF, Brigell MG, Hamilton R, Holder GE, Tzekov R, Bach M (2015) ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update). Doc Ophthalmol 130:1–12. doi:10.1007/s10633-014-9473-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmöger E (1962) Die Rolle Der Praeadaptation Im Klinischen Erg. Acta Ophthalmol Scan 40(S70):32–50. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.1962.tb00305.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bornschein H (1962) Explanation of recommendation 9. Acta Ophthalmol Scan 40(S70):100–107. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.1962.tb00311.x

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cameron AM, Mahroo OAR, Lamb TD (2006) Dark adaptation of human rod bipolar cells measured from the b-wave of the scotopic electroretinogram. J Physiol 575(2):507–526. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2006.108027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Fulton AB, Rushton WAH (1978) The human rod ERG: Correlation with psychophysical responses in light and dark adaptation. Vis Res 18:793–800. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(78)90119-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas MM, Lamb TD (1999) Light adaptation and dark adaptation of human rod photoreceptors measured from the a-wave of the electroretinogram. J Physiol 518:479–496. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0479p.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mahroo OAR, Lamb TD (2004) Recovery of the human photopic electroretinogram after bleaching exposures: estimation of pigment regeneration kinetics. J Physiol 554:417–437. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2003.051250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruseckaite R, Lamb TD, Pianta MJ, Cameron AM (2011) Human scotopic dark adaptation: comparison of recoveries of psychophysical threshold and ERG b-wave sensitivity. J Vis 11:2. doi:10.1167/11.8.2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cameron AM, Miao L, Ruseckaite R, Pianta MJ, Lamb TD (2008) Dark adaptation recovery of human rod bipolar cell response kinetics estimated from scotopic b-wave measurements. J Physiol 586:5419–5436. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2008.160028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Abdlseaed A Al (2014) Pupil dilation, light source, gender and pigmentation effects on normal adult human ERGs, and an exploration of short latency VEPs. Ph.D. thesis, Glasgow Caledonian University

  16. Armstrong RA (2013) Statistical guidelines for the analysis of data obtained from one or both eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 33:7–14. doi:10.1111/opo.12009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bland JM, Altman DG (1996) Statistics notes 23: measurement error proportional to the mean. BMJ 313:106. doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7049.106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wali N, Leguire LE (1991) Dark-adapted luminance-response functions with skin and corneal electrodes. Doc Ophthalmol 76:367–375. doi:10.1007/bf00142675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamilton R, Abdlseaed AA, Healey J, Neveu MM, Brown L, Keating D, McBain VA, Sculfor D, Thompson DA (2015) Multi-centre variability of ISCEV standard ERGs in two normal adults. Doc Ophthalmol 130:83–101. doi:10.1007/s10633-014-9471-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Horowitz GL (2010) EP28-A3C defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; approved guideline, 3rd edn. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Pennsylvania

  21. Freund PR, Watson J, Gilmour G, Sauvé Y (2011) Differential changes in retina function with normal aging in humans. Doc Ophthalmol 122:177–190. doi:10.1007/s10633-011-9273-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Birch DG, Anderson JL, Fish GE (1999) Yearly rates of rod and cone functional loss in retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy. Ophthalmology 106:258–268. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90064-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Berson EL, Sandberg MA, Rosner B, Birch DG, Hanson AH (1985) Natural course of retinitis pigmentosa over a three-year interval. Am J Ophthalmol 99:240–251. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(85)90351-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chambers W (2005) Regulatory perspectives. Special Session on Drug Development & Clinical Trials, International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision Symposium, Glasgow, UK, August 2005. ISCEV Publications, ISBN 0-9527391-2-7

  25. Jackson GR, Owsley C, McGwin G Jr (1999) Aging and dark adaptation. Vis Res 39(23):3975–3982. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00092-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Neveu MM, Dangour A, Allen E, Robson AG, Bird AC, Uauy R, Holder GE (2011) Electroretinogram measures in a septuagenarian population. Doc Ophthalmol 123(2):75–81. doi:10.1007/s10633-011-9282-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the subjects and members of CEVnet for responses to questions regarding the origin of the 20 min minimum dark adaptation duration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Hamilton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamilton, R., Graham, K. Effect of shorter dark adaptation on ISCEV standard DA 0.01 and DA 3 skin ERGs in healthy adults. Doc Ophthalmol 133, 11–19 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-016-9554-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-016-9554-x

Keywords

Navigation