Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of the study is to present a method (Selfcorr) by which to measure intersession latency differences between multifocal VEP (mfVEP) signals.
Methods
The authors compared the intersession latency difference obtained using a correlation method (Selfcorr) against that obtained using a Template method. While the Template method cross-correlates the subject’s signals with a reference database, the Selfcorr method cross-correlates traces across subsequent recordings taken from the same subject.
Results
The variation in latency between intersession signals was 0.8 ± 13.6 and 0.5 ± 5.0 ms for the Template and Selfcorr methods, respectively, with a coefficient of variability C V_TEMPLATE = 15.83 and C V_SELFCORR = 5.68 (n = 18, p = 0.0002, Wilcoxon). The number of analyzable sectors with the Template and Selfcorr methods was 36.7 ± 8.5 and 45.3 ± 8.7, respectively (p = 0.0001, paired t test, two tailed).
Conclusions
The Selfcorr method produces smaller intersession mfVEP delays and variability over time than the Template method.
References
Grover L, Hood D, Ghadiali Q et al (2008) A comparison of multifocal and conventional visual evoked potential techniques in patients with optic neuritis/multiple sclerosis. Doc Ophthalmol 117:121–128. doi:10.1007/s10633-007-9112-7
Sriram P, Klistorner A, Arvind H, Graham SL (2012) Reproducibility of multifocal VEP latency using different stimulus presentations. Doc Ophthalmol 125:43–49. doi:10.1007/s10633-012-9334-1
Thie J, Sriram P, Klistorner A, Graham SL (2012) Gaussian wavelet transform and classifier to reliably estimate latency of multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP). Vision Res 52:79–87. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.11.002
Hood DC, Ohri N, Yang EB, Rodarte C, Zhang X, Fortune B et al (2004) Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials: a monocular analysis. Doc Ophthalmol 109:189–199
Fortune B, Zhang X, Hood DC, Demirel S, Johnson CA (2004) Normative ranges and specificity of the multifocal VEP. Doc Ophthalmol 109:87–100
Hood DC, Zhang X, Rodarte C, Yang EB, Ohri N, Fortune B, Johnson CA (2004) Determining abnormal interocular latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 109:177–187
Klistorner A, Graham S, Fraser C, Garrick R, Nguyen T, Paine M, O’Day J, Grigg J, Arvind H, Billson FA (2007) Electrophysiological evidence for heterogeneity of lesions in optic neuritis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48(10):4549–4556
Acknowledgments
Research supported by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (Spain) Grants TEC2011-26066, FIS PI11/00533 and RETICS RD12/0034/0006. We wish to thank Dr. D.C. Hood for his generosity with the software used to analyze the mfVEP data.
Conflict of interest
The authors claim no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Santiago, L., Fernández, A., Blanco, R. et al. Improved measurement of intersession latency in mfVEPs. Doc Ophthalmol 129, 65–69 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-014-9438-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-014-9438-x