Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the ability of multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEPs) to identify functional loss in patients with early and exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). A dichoptic multifocal stimulus presentation was employed to investigate the regional effects of AMD and the potential diagnostic utility in macular disease.
Methods
MfVEP responses were recorded from 19 unilateral exudative AMD patients with non-exudative (n = 15) or normal (n = 4) presentations in the fellow eye and 28 age-matched controls. Root mean square (RMS) waveforms were pooled across selected EEG channels to produce global field RMS (gfRMS) waveforms. GfRMS amplitudes and response delays were analysed by multivariate linear models, and diagnostic capacity was measured using areas under the curve (AUC) of receiver operator characteristic plots.
Results
The mean gfRMS amplitude of the exudative eye of AMD patients was significantly reduced compared with the controls (−2.03 ± 0.08 dB, t = −12.9). Fellow non-exudative AMD eyes were less effected but still significantly reduced (−0.84 ± 0.07 dB, t = −11.5). No significant difference in mean gfRMS delay of AMD eyes across the central 46° was observed. AUC values of 100 ± 0.0 % (mean ± SE) for exudative and 79.7 ± 6.5 % for non-exudative eyes were obtained for response amplitudes.
Conclusion
The study demonstrated that mfVEP identified retinal dysfunction in both exudative AMD and fellow non-exudative AMD eyes, but mostly affecting the macular field. The reduced testing duration and good diagnostic accuracy suggest that dichoptic mfVEPs may be a sensitive tool for monitoring progression in AMD.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Regan D, Heron JR (1969) Clinical investigation of lesions of the visual pathway: a new objective technique. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 32(5):479–483
Milner BA, Regan D, Heron JR (1974) Differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis by visual evoked potential recording. Brain 97(4):755–772
Cappin JM, Nissim S (1975) Visual evoked responses in the assessment of field defects in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 93(1):9–18
Baseler HA, Sutter EE, Klein SA, Carney T (1994) The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 90(1):65–81
Ruseckaite R, Maddess T, Danta G, Lueck CJ, James AC (2005) Sparse multifocal stimuli for the detection of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 57(6):904–913
Hood DC, Zhang X, Greenstein VC, Kangovi S, Odel JG, Liebmann JM, Ritch R (2000) An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(6):1580–1587
Chen JY, Hood DC, Odel JG, Behrens MM (2006) The effects of retinal abnormalities on the multifocal visual evoked potential. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(10):4378–4385
Wolff BE, Bearse MA Jr, Schneck ME, Barez S, Adams AJ (2010) Multifocal VEP (mfVEP) reveals abnormal neuronal delays in diabetes. Doc Ophthalmol 121(3):189–196
Lennerstrand G (1982) Delayed visual evoked cortical potentials in retinal disease. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 60(4):497–504
Marcus M, Merin S, Wolf M, Feinsod M (1983) Electrophysiologic tests in assessment of senile macular degeneration. Ann Ophthalmol 15(3):235–238
Folk JC, Thompson HS, Han DP, Brown CK (1984) Visual function abnormalities in central serous retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 102(9):1299–1302
Bass SJ, Sherman J, Bodis-Wollner I, Nath S (1985) Visual evoked potentials in macular disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26(8):1071–1074
Sherman J, Bass SJ, Noble KG, Nath S, Sutija V (1986) Visual evoked potential (VEP) delays in central serous choroidopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 27(2):214–221
Johnson LN, Yee RD, Hepler RS, Martin DA (1987) Alteration of the visual evoked potential by macular holes: comparison with optic neuritis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 225(2):123–128
Shimada Y, Adachi-Usami E, Murayama K (1997) How are macular changes reflected in pattern visually evoked cortical potentials? Acta Ophthalmol Scand 75(3):277–280
Negishi C, Takasoh M, Fujimoto N, Tsuyama Y, Adachi-Usami E (2001) Visual evoked potentials in relation to visual acuity in macular disease. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 79(3):271–276
Rosli Y, Xin-Lin G, James A, Maddess T (2008) Neural signal processing of mfVEP responses from AMD patients. In: Information technology. International symposium on, pp 1–6
James AC (2003) The pattern-pulse multifocal visual evoked potential. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44(2):879–890
James AC, Ruseckaite R, Maddess T (2005) Effect of temporal sparseness and dichoptic presentation on multifocal visual evoked potentials. Vis Neurosci 22(1):45–54
Maddess T, James AC, Bowman EA (2005) Contrast response of temporally sparse dichoptic multifocal visual evoked potentials. Vis Neurosci 22(2):153–162
James AC, Maddess T, Goh XL, Winkles N (2005) Spatially sparse pattern-pulse stimulation enhances multifocal visual evoked potential analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46(5):3602
Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310
Bell A, James AC, Kolic M, Essex RW, Maddess T (2010) Dichoptic multifocal pupillography reveals afferent visual field defects in early type 2 diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(1):602–608
Sabeti F, Maddess T, Essex RW, James AC (2011) Multifocal pupillographic assessment of age-related macular degeneration. Optom Vis Sci 88(12):1477–1485
Stensaas SS, Eddington DK, Dobelle WH (1974) The topography and variability of the primary visual cortex in man. J Neurosurg 40(6):747–755
Rademacher J, Caviness VS Jr, Steinmetz H, Galaburda AM (1993) Topographical variation of the human primary cortices: implications for neuroimaging, brain mapping, and neurobiology. Cereb Cortex 3(4):313–329
Curcio CA, Medeiros NE, Millican CL (1996) Photoreceptor loss in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37(7):1236–1249
Sokol S (1972) An electrodiagnostic index of macular degeneration. Use of a checkerboard pattern stimulus. Arch Ophthalmol 88(6):619–624
Walter P, Konigsfeld P, Soudavar F, Brunner R (2000) Unusual visual evoked potentials in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmologica 214(5):312–319
Graham SL, Klistorner AI, Grigg JR, Billson FA (2000) Objective VEP perimetry in glaucoma: asymmetry analysis to identify early deficits. J Glaucoma 9(1):10–19
Gin TJ, Luu CD, Guymer RH (2011) Central retinal function as measured by the multifocal electroretinogram and flicker perimetry in early age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52(12):9267–9274
Han DP, Thompson HS, Folk JC (1985) Differentiation between recently resolved optic neuritis and central serous retinopathy. Use of tests of visual function. Arch Ophthalmol 103(3):394–396
Yu DY, Cringle S, Valter K, Walsh N, Lee D, Stone J (2004) Photoreceptor death, trophic factor expression, retinal oxygen status, and photoreceptor function in the P23H rat. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45(6):2013–2019
Chrysostomou V, Stone J, Valter K (2009) Life history of cones in the rhodopsin-mutant P23H-3 rat: evidence of long-term survival. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50(5):2407–2416
Okawa H, Sampath AP, Laughlin SB, Fain GL (2008) ATP consumption by mammalian rod photoreceptors in darkness and in light. Curr Biol 18(24):1917–1921
Curcio CA, Sloan KR, Kalina RE, Hendrickson AE (1990) Human photoreceptor topography. J Comp Neurol 292(4):497–523
Ivers RQ, Optom B, Macaskill P, Cumming RG, Mitchell P (2001) Sensitivity and specificity of tests to detect eye disease in an older population. Ophthalmology 108(5):968–975
Gerth C, Hauser D, Delahunt PB, Morse LS, Werner JS (2003) Assessment of multifocal electroretinogram abnormalities and their relation to morphologic characteristics in patients with large drusen. Arch Ophthalmol 121(10):1404–1414
Fortune B, Schneck ME, Adams AJ (1999) Multifocal electroretinogram delays reveal local retinal dysfunction in early diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40(11):2638–2651
White JM, Bedell HE (1990) The oculomotor reference in humans with bilateral macular disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 31(6):1149–1161
Schuchard RA (2005) Preferred retinal loci and macular scotoma characteristics in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Can J Ophthalmol 40(3):303–312
Timberlake GT, Mainster MA, Peli E, Augliere RA, Essock EA, Arend LE (1986) Reading with a macular scotoma. I. Retinal location of scotoma and fixation area. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 27(7):1137–1147
Tarita-Nistor L, Brent MH, Steinbach MJ, Gonzalez EG (2011) Fixation stability during binocular viewing in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52(3):1887–1893
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Australian Research Council (ARC) through the ARC Centre of Excellence in Vision Science (CE0561903), AusIndustry and Seeing Machines Ltd, Canberra.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sabeti, F., James, A.C., Essex, R.W. et al. Dichoptic multifocal visual evoked potentials identify local retinal dysfunction in age-related macular degeneration. Doc Ophthalmol 126, 125–136 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-012-9366-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-012-9366-6