Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The influence of age on the recovery of the ERG photostress test

Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Focal ERG associated with photostress test could be a useful diagnostic method for evaluating macular visual function. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of age on the recovery time constant of the ERG photostress test. The second aim was to assess the sources of variability which affect the measurements.

Methods

Fifty-four healthy subjects (108 eyes), aged between 21 and 77, with corrected VA of 20/20 or more and absence of any ocular or systemic disease, were recruited. For each eye ERG response to focal (20° in diameter) 42-Hz stimulation was recorded: three series of 200 summations in base conditions and a six series of 42-Hz ERGs (100 summations each) at 10, 40, 80, 180, 300 and 420 s after bleaching by a white spot of light (20° in diameter) from a direct ophthalmoscope (800 cd/m²) pointed at macular region for 30 s. Fourier analysis was performed and amplitude of the first harmonica calculated. The relationship of basal amplitudes with subject age and gender, and the kinetics of macular function recovery were assessed through mixed-effects models.

Results

Mean basal amplitude decreases by 0.046 μV for year of life. The recovery after bleaching is proportional to age with an increase of 4.31 s for decade. Restoration of amplitude is slower in older subjects.

Discussion

There is a significant decrease in macular ERG amplitude with age. The macular recovery after photostress shows exponential kinetics that are less efficient in older subjects: this could be related to lower effectiveness of photopigment restoration in advanced age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jones R, King Smith PE, Loffing DH, Gaynier FL (1986) Stray light contribution to the focal electroretinogram (FERG). Clin Vis Res 1:153–158

    Google Scholar 

  2. Riggs LA, Johnson EEP, Shick AML (1964) Electrical responses of the human eye to moving stimulus patterns. Science 144:567–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Seipe W, Siegel IM, Carr E, Mayron C (1986) Evaluating macular function using the focal ERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 27:1123–1130

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sandberg MA, Ariel M (1977) Hand-held two channel stimulator ophthalmoscope. Arch Ophthalmol 95:1881–1882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kondo M, Sievong PA (2002) Post-receptorial activity dominates primate photopic 32-Hz ERG for sine-, square-, and pulsed stimuli. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:305–312

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baron WS, Boynton RM, Hamman RW (1979) Component analysis of the foveal local electroretinogram elicited in sinusoidal flicker. Vis Res 18:479–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Porciatti V, Falsini B, Fadda A, Bolzani R (1989) Steady state analysis of the focal ERG to pattern and flicker: relationship between ERG components and retinal pathology. Clin Vis Sci 4:323–332

    Google Scholar 

  8. Falsini B, Porciatti V, Fadda A, Iarossi G, Merendino E, Cermola S (1995) The first and second harmonics of macular flicker electroretinogram: different effects of retinal diseases. Doc Ophthalmol 90:157–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Falsini B, Fadda A, Iarossi G, Piccardi M, Canu M, Minnella A, Serrao S, Scullica L (2000) Retinal sensitivity to flicker modulation: reduced by early age-related maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:1498–1506

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Falsini B, Ziccardi L, Stifano G, Iarossi G, Merendino E, Minnella A, Fadda A, Balestrazzi E (2007) Temporal response properties of the macular cone system: effect of normal aging and age-related maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:4811–4817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Phipps JA, Guymer RH, Vingrys AJ (2003) Loss of cone function in age-related maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:2277–2283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dimitrov PN, Guymer RH, Zele AJ, Anderson AJ, Vingrys AJ (2008) Measuring rod and cone dynamics in age-related. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:55–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Makabe R (1984) Photostress test as an indicator of macular edema. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 88:786–788

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Margrain TH, Thomson D (2002) Sources of variability in the clinical photostress test. Ophthalmic Physiol 22:61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Paupoo V, Mahroo OA, Frieburg C, Lamb TD (2000) Human cone photoreceptor responses measured by electroretinogram a-wave during and after exposure to intense illumination. J Physiol 529(Pt2):469–482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahroo OA, Lamb TD (2003) Recovery of the human photopic electroretinogram after bleaching exposure: estimation of pigment regeneration kinetics. J Physiol 554:417–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hollins M, Alpert M (1973) Dark adaptation and visual pigment regeneration in human cones. J Gen Physiol 62:430–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Coile DC, Baker HD (1992) Foveal dark adaptation, photopigment regeneration, and aging. Vis Neurosci 8:27–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Binns A, Margrain TH (2005) Evaluation of retinal function using the dynamic focal cone ERG. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 25:492–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wood A, Margrain T, Binns A (2011) The effect of bleach duration and age on the ERG photostress test. Graefe Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249(9):1359–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Murdoch I, Morris S, Cousens S (1998) Peoples and eyes: statistical approaches in ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol 82(8):971–973

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Carstensen B (2010) Comparing clinical measurement methods. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. R Development Core Team (2010). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org. Accessed on 07/07/2011

  25. Carstensen B, Gurrin L (2011). MethComp: functions for analysis of method comparison studies. R package version 1.3

  26. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D and the R Core team (2009). nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-96

  27. Binns A, Margrain TH (2007) Evaluating retinal function in age-related maculopathy with the ERG photostress test. Inv Ophthalmol 48:2806–2813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Phipps JA, Guymer RH, Vingrys AJ (2003) Loss of cone function in age-related maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:2277–2283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which helped to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Messenio.

Additional information

D. Messenio and G. Marano contributed equally to this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Messenio, D., Marano, G., Gerosa, S. et al. The influence of age on the recovery of the ERG photostress test. Doc Ophthalmol 126, 87–97 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-012-9361-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-012-9361-y

Keywords

Navigation