Skip to main content
Log in

Visual electrophysiological findings in CHARGE syndrome with bilateral colobomas: a case report

  • Case report
  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Colobomas are the major ophthalmic manifestation of CHARGE syndrome. Ophthalmological advice may be sought for an infant diagnosed with CHARGE syndrome presenting with coloboma, and electrophysiology can be particularly useful in assessing retinal and cortical function at an early age. Here we describe electrophysiology findings in a four-week-old infant born with bilateral coloboma, more extensive in the right eye, as part of CHARGE syndrome. The left eye showed robust ERGs indicating near-normal rod and cone function. The right eye ERG amplitudes were relatively reduced being around one half to two-thirds that of the left eye ERGs. Flash VEPs were present from both left and right eyes, but the right eye VEP was smaller and delayed relative to that of the left eye. By 5 years of age, right eye acuity was approximately 6/1000 and left eye acuity was 6/12 (Cardiff cards). In cases such as this, it is helpful to give parents a reasonable prediction of visual outcome as soon as possible, allowing instigation of appropriate management and permitting parents to begin to come to terms with the diagnosis. Electrophysiology can provide valuable information on visual function when behavioural testing is limited by the child’s ability to co-operate, such as during the early weeks of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Vissers LELM, van Ravenswaaij CMA, Admiraal RJ, Hurst JA, De Vries BBA, Janssen IM, van der Vliet WA, Huys EHLPG, de Jong PJ, Hamel BCJ, Schoenmakers EFPM, Brunner HG, Veltman JA, van Kessel AG (2004) Mutations in a new member of the chromodomain gene family cause CHARGE syndrome. Nat Genet 36(9):955–957

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blake KD, Davenport SLH, Hall BD, Hefner MA, Pagon RA, Williams MS, Lin AE, Graham JM Jr (1998) CHARGE association: An update and review for the primary pediatrician. Clin Pediatr 37(3):159–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blake KD, Prasad C (2006) Review: CHARGE syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 1(34):41

    Google Scholar 

  4. Graham JM (2001) Editorial comment: a recognizable syndrome within CHARGE association: Hall-Hittner syndrome. Am J Med Genet 99:120–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McMain K, Robitaille J, Smith I, Johnson J, Wood E, Tremblay F, Blake KD (2008) Ocular features of CHARGE syndrome. J Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 12:460–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jongmans MCJ, Admiraal RJ, van der Donk KP, Vissers LELM, Baas AF, Kapusta L, van Hagen JM, Donnai D, de Ravel TJ, Veltman JA, van Kessel AG, De Vries BBA, Brunner HG, Hoefsloot LH, van Ravenswaaij CMA (2006) CHARGE syndrome: the phenotypic spectrum of mutations in the CHD7 gene. J Med Genet 43:306–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Strömland K, Sjögreen L, Johansson M, Joelsson B-ME, Miller M, Danielsson S, Billstedt E, Gillberg C, Jacobsson C, Norinder JA, Granström G (2005) CHARGE association in Sweden. Am J Med Genet 133A:331–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Russell-Eggitt IM, Blake KD, Taylor DSI, Wyse RKH (1990) The eye in the CHARGE association. Br J Ophthalmol 74:421–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanlaville D, Verloes A (2007) CHARGE syndrome: an update. Eur J Hum Genet 15:389–399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bradnam MS, Evans AL, Montgomery DMI, Keating D, Damato BE, Cluckie A, Allan D (1994) A personal computer-based visual evoked potential stimulus and recording system. Doc Ophthalmol 86:81–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Marmor MF, Zrenner E (1999) Standard for clinical electroretinography (1999 update). Doc Ophthalmol 97:143–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fulton AB, Hansen RM, Westall CA (2003) Development of ERG responses: the ISCEV rod, maximal and cone responses in normal subjects. Doc Ophthalmol 107(3):235–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schulze-Bonsel K, Feltgen N, Burau H, Hansen L, Bach M (2006) Visual acuities ‘hand motion’ and ‘counting fingers’ can be quantified with the Freiburg visual acuity test. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(3):1236–1240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tormene AP, Riva C (1999) Electroretinogram and visual-evoked potentials in children with optic nerve coloboma. Doc Ophthalmol 96:347–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Hamilton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamilton, R., Gonzalez, P., Dudgeon, J. et al. Visual electrophysiological findings in CHARGE syndrome with bilateral colobomas: a case report. Doc Ophthalmol 121, 63–67 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-010-9224-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-010-9224-3

Keywords

Navigation