Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of ageing on stereopsis A VEP study

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Differences in brain activation between young (n=11, ages 21–35) and elderly (n=8, ages 70–84) healthy participants were studied using visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to different kinds of computer generated random-dot patterns. The main stimulus of interest was a 2 × 2 array of rectangles whose rectangles moved to and fro in depth. Control conditions were similar 2 × 2 arrays, one with side-to-side lateral motion (LM) of the rectangles, and one a stationary baseline condition. The third non-stereo stimulus was an expanding field of small dots in radial motion (RM). Significant stereo related activation was found in both age groups. The stereo VEPs showed a longer latency of depth reversal triggered VEP peaks compared to control LM VEPs. The amplitudes of LM VEPs were larger than the baseline VEPs. Age-related differences were found not only in stereo but also in the other conditions. Thus the latency of early VEP peaks was shorter and their amplitude higher in the elderly for LM and baseline conditions, and the younger participants showed significantly higher activation in the later VEP peaks of all conditions. Our main finding is no evidence for age related stereo specific effects in brain activation, but instead more general and subtle changes that affect widely different visual stimulus conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wright LA, Wormald RP. Stereopsis and ageing. Eye 1992; 6(5): 473–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schneck ME, Haegerstrom-Portnoy G, Lott LA, Brabyn JA. Ocular contributions to age-related loss in coarse ste-Reopsis. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77(10): 531–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Greene HA, Madden DJ. Adult age differences in visual acuity, stereopsis, and contrast sensitivity. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987; 64(10): 749–53.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yekta AA, Pickwell LD, Jenkins TC. Binocular vision, age and symptoms. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1989; 9(2): 115–20.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grady CL, Haxby JV, Horowitz B, Gillette J, Salerno JA, Gonzalez-Aviles A, Carson RE, Herscovitch P, Schapiro MB, Rapoport SI. Activation of cerebral blood flow during a visuoperceptual task in patients with Alz-heimer-type dementia. Neurobiol Aging 1993; 14(1): 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grady CL. Age-related changes in cortical blood flow activation during perception and memory. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1996;777:14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huettel SA, Singerman JD, McCarthy G. The e effects of aging upon the hemodynamic response measured by functional MRI. Neuroimage 2001; 13(1): 161–75.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fiorentini A, Porciatti V, Morrone MC, Burr DC. Visual ageing:unspeci c decline of the responses to luminance and colour. Vision Res 1996; 36(21): 3557–66.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Golob EJ, Miranda GG, Johnson JK, Starr A. Sensory cortical interactions in aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer 's disease. Neurobiol Aging 2001; 22(5): 755–63.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brainard DH. The Psychophysics Toolbox, Spat Vis 1997;10:433–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pelli DG. The VideoToolbox software for visual psycho-physics:transforming numbers into movies, Spat Vis 1997;10: 437–42.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Janssen P, Vogels R, Orban GA. Assessment of stereop-sis in rhesus monkeys using visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 1999;95: 247–55.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Julesz B, Kropfl W, Petrig B. Large evoked potentials to dynamic random-dot correlograms and stereograms per-mit quick determination of stereopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1980; 77(4): 2348–51.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tucker DM. Spatial sampling of head electrical elds: the geodesic sensor net. Electroencephalogr Clin Neuro-physiol 1993; 87(3): 154–63.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bach M, Meigen T. Similar electrophysiological corre-lates of texture segregation induced by luminance, orien-tation, motion and stereo. Vision Res 1997; 37(11): 1409–14.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Skrandies W. Visual persistence of stereoscopic stimuli: electric brain activity without perceptul correlate. Vision Res 1987; 27(12): 2109–18.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bennett PJ, Sekuler AB, McIntosh AR, Della-Maggio-reV. The effects of aging on visual memory:evidence for functional reorganization of cortical networks. Acta Psy-chol 2001; 107(1 –3): 249–73.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cabeza R, Grady CL, Nyberg L, McIntosh AR, Tulving E, Kapur S, Jennings JM, Houle S, Craik FI. Age-related differences in neural activity during memory encoding and retrieval:a positron emission tomography study. J Neurosci 1997; 17(1): 391–400.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Raz N, Williamson A, Gunning-Dixon F, Head D, Acker JD. Neuroanatomical and cognitive correlates of adult age differences in acquisition of a perceptual-motor skill. Microsc Res Tech 2000; 51(1):85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Anderer P, Pascual-Marqui RD, Semlitsch HV, Saletu B. Differential effects of normal aging on sources of standard N1,target N1 and target P300 auditory event-related brain potentials revealed by low resolution electromagnetic tomography. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 108(2): 160–74.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tetewsky SJ, Duffy CJ. Visual loss and getting lost in Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1999; 52(5): 958–65.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Trick GL, Silverman SE. Visual sensitivity to motion:age-related changes and de cits in senile demen-tia of the Alzheimer type. Neurology 1991; 41(9):1437–40.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Warren WH Jr, Blackwell AW, Morris MW. Age differ-ences in perceiving the direction of self-motion from optical flow. J Gerontol 1989; 44(5): 147–53.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pekkonen E, Huotilainen M, Virtanen J, Sinkkonen J, Rinne T, Ilmoniemi RJ, Naatanen R. Age-related functional differences between auditory cortices:a whole-head MEG study. NeuroReport 1995; 6(13): 1803–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taroyan, N., Thiyagesh, S., Vigon, L. et al. The effects of ageing on stereopsis A VEP study. Doc Ophthalmol 108, 185–196 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-004-4061-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-004-4061-x

Navigation