Advertisement

Dialectical Anthropology

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 277–291 | Cite as

Individualization, inequality, and labor: a qualitative approach

  • Marta M. LobatoEmail author
  • José Luis Molina
  • Hugo Valenzuela-García
Article
  • 171 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we show how we came to explore Beck’s theory of individualization in the light of a qualitative study of livelihood strategies in post-2008 Spain and Cyprus. We observed that experiences of downward social mobility in contexts of welfare retreat and precarious labor conditions were compelling people to build marketed individualities and to create individual biographies with recourse to a highly individualized rhetoric. However, analysis of a very diverse sample of subjects from different socio-economic backgrounds showed us that individualization theory must be conceptualized within a framework of social structures, and that Beck’s individualization theory fails to recognize its persistence in contemporary societies. We therefore propose looking at individualization as a contemporary process through which class differences are expressed. Only in this way can it serve as a useful theoretical tool with which to understand the workings of contemporary capitalism and the ways in which new values and moral frameworks are being formed.

Keywords

Individualization Livelihood strategies Crisis Labor 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The article’s main author, Marta M. Lobato, would like to thank anonymous reviewers, especially reviewer number one, for their valuable comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Armano, E., and A. Murgia. 2017. Hybrid Areas of Work in Italy: Hypothesis to Interpret the Transformations of Precariousness and Subjectivity. In Mapping Precariousness, Labour Insecurity and Uncertain Livelihoods, ed. E. Armano, A. Bove, and A. Murgia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, W. 2010. The Myth of the Reflexive Worker: Class and Work Histories in Neo-liberal Times. Work, Employment and Society. 24 (3): 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. 2001. The Individualized Society. Cambrige. Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, U. 1996. The Reinvention of Politics.Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, U., and E. Beck-Gernsheim. 2002. Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, U., Giddens, A. and Lash, S. 1994. Reflexive Modernization.Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Beck, U., W. Bonss, and C. Lau. 2003. The Theory of Reflexive Modernization. Theory. Culture & Society. 20 (2): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernardi, F. 2007. Le Quattro Sociologie e la Stratificazione Sociale. Sociologica . Google Scholar
  10. Brannen, J., and A. Nilsen. 2005. Individualisation, Choice and Structure: a Discussion of Current Trends in Sociological nalysis. The Sociological Review 53 (3): 412–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cetina, K. 1997. Sociality with Objects: Social Relations in Post social Knowledge Societies. Theory. Culture & Society 14 (4): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Arndt, C., and Hörisch, F. 2015. Flexicurity Policies in Europe: Diffusion and Effects of flexicurity labour market policies. Working Paper. CUPESSE (2). http://cupesse.eu/fileadmin/cupesse/downloads/working-papers/CUPESSE_Working-Paper_2.pdf.
  13. Dardot, P., and C. Laval. 2009. La Nouvelle Raison du Monde. Essai sur la Societé Neóliberale. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  14. Denning, M. 2010. Wageless Life. New Left Review 60 (November–December). https://newleftreview.org/II/66/michael-denning-wageless-life.
  15. Festinger, L. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Freeman, C. 2014. Entrepreneurial Selves: Neoliberal Respectability and the Making of a Caribbean Middle Class. Durham : Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Frykman, J., and O. Löfgren. 1987. Culture Builders: A Historical Anthropology of Middle-Class Life. London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fumagalli, A. 2010. Bioeconomía y Capitalismo Cognitivo. Hacia un Nuevo Paradigma de Acumulación. Navarra: Traficantes de Sueños.Google Scholar
  20. Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge : Polity.Google Scholar
  21. Graeber, D. 2013. It is Value that Brings Universities into Being. Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (2): 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hochschild, Arlie R. (ed). (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kashmir, S., and A. Carbonella. 2014. Blood and Fire: Toward a Global Anthropology of Labour. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  24. Kjaerulff, Jens. (2015). Flexible Capitalism: Exchange and Ambiguity at Work. United Kingdom: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  25. Lazzarato, M. 2012. The Making of The Indebted Man: An Essay on the Neoliberal Condition. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  26. Millar, K. 2014. The pPrecarious Present: Wageless Labour and Disrupted Life in Rio de Janeiro. Brazil. Cultural Anthropology 21 (1): 32–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mingione, E. 1991. Las Sociedades Fragmentadas: Una Sociología de la Vida Económica más allá del Paradigma del Mercado. Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social.Google Scholar
  28. Molé, N.J. 2012. Hauntings of Solidarity in Post-Fordist Italy. Anthropological Quarterly 85 (2): 371–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Muehlebach, A. (2012). The Moral Neoliberal: Welfare and Citizenship in Italy. Chigaco: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Muehlebach, A., and N. Shoshan. 2012. Introduction. Post-Fordist Affect. Anthropological Quarterly 85 (2): 317–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Narotzky, S., and N. Besnier. 2014. Crisis, Value and Hope: Rethinking the Economy. Current Anthropology 55 (9): S4–S16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Offer, S. 2012. The Burden of Reciprocity: Processes of exclusion and withdrawal from personal networks among low-income families. Current Sociology 60 (6): 788–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rose, N. 1999. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  35. Skeggs, B. 2004. Class, Self, Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Valenzuela, H., L. Reygadas, and F. Cruces. 2015. Mi trabajo es mi vida. La incrustación de los mundos de la vida y del trabajo en empresas españolas. / My job is my life. Overlap between life and work in Spanish companies. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas 150: 191–210.Google Scholar
  37. Vogt, K. C, 2017. The Concept of the Work Situation in Class Analysis. Current Sociology. Pp.1–18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations