Advertisement

Dialectical Anthropology

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 225–240 | Cite as

Brexit positions: neoliberalism, austerity and immigration—the (im)possibilities? of political revolution

  • Kathy PowellEmail author
Article

Abstract

The UK referendum on European Union membership exposed profound social and political divisions, rooted in the establishment of a neoliberal consensus that eclipsed the left and arguments against inequality, and intensified over several years of post-crisis austerity’s assault on the working poor, the disadvantaged and the immigrants. The narrow vote to leave confounded expectations on both sides of the referendum campaign, provoking a political crisis that has empowered a far right unlikely to address grievances, incited intense hostility between triumphant ‘leavers’ and dismayed ‘remainers’, and produced profound uncertainty about the future. This paper argues that while ‘Brexit’ has been characterized as a ‘people’s revolt’ against capitalist globalization, the decision to leave the EU has been aligned by a discourse of nativist nationalism and attempts to re-entrench an authoritarian Conservative hegemony; these attempts are, however, floundering which poses both opportunities and challenges for a resurgent parliamentary left and for radical grassroots politics going forward.

Keywords

Austerity Immigration EU referendum Conservative hegemony Labour resurgence 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

This study complies with the Journal’s ethical standards.

This study received no funding.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adams, Tim. 2017. Is the editor of the Daily Mail the most dangerous man in Britain? The Guardian  14th May 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/may/14/is-paul-dacre-most-dangerous-man-in-britain-daily-mail. Accessed 14 May 2017.
  2. Ashcroft, Lord. 2016. How the United Kingdom voted on Thursday… and why. Lord Ashcroft Polls. http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2016/06/how-the-united-kingdom-voted-and-why/ Accessed 3 April 2017.
  3. Badiou, Alain. 2008. The communist hypothesis. New Left Review 49: 29–42.Google Scholar
  4. Block, Fred, and Margaret R. Somers. 2014. The power of market fundamentalism: Karl Polanyi’s critique. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloodworth, James. 2014. Inequality: where Labour really did crash the car. Left Foot Forward. https://leftfootforward.org/2014/10/inequality-where-labour-really-did-crash-the-car/ Accessed 3 April 2017.
  6. Boyle, Frankie. 2016. The Brexiteers look like villains cornered by Batman in a hall of mirrors. The Guardian. 31 May. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/may/31/brexit-referendum-campaigns-politicians?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other Accessed 31 May 2016.
  7. Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the demos. neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  8. Dropkin, Greg. 2016. Brexit: John Pilger is wrong. LabourNet UK. http://www.labournet.net/other/1607/brexit1.html. Accessed 8 August 2016.
  9. Gentleman, Amelia. 2016. The IDS way: Victorian morality, reforming zeal and gross incompetence. The Guardian. 20 March. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/mar/20/ids-victorian-morality-reforming-zeal-gross-incompetence. Accessed 21 March 2016.
  10. Geraghty, Kyle. 2017. Class and Brexit: or, why we should stop worrying about the working class and focus on capitalism. Salvage. March 2017. http://salvage.zone/in-print/class-and-brexit-or-why-we-should-stop-worrying-about-the-working-class-and-focus-on-capitalism/. Accessed 3 April 2017.
  11. Goodwin, Matthew and Oliver Heath. 2016. Brexit vote explained: poverty, low skills and lack of opportunities. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/brexit-vote-explained-poverty-low-skills-and-lack-opportunities. Accessed 3 April 2017.
  12. Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. In Selections from prison notebooks, ed. Geoffrey Nowell Smith and Quintin Hoare. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  13. Key, Chris. 2017. Modelling the British economy after Brexit on Singapore is a really bad idea. The Independent. 19 January. http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/brexit-singapore-british-economy-new-model-really-bad-idea-a7535226.html. Accessed 21 January 2017.
  14. Kimber, Charlie. 2016. Why did Britain vote Leave? in International Socialism. Issue 152. http://isj.org.uk/why-did-britain-vote-leave/. Accessed 3 April 2017.
  15. Krastev, Ivan. 2014. From politics to protest. Journal of Democracy 25 (4): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maiguascha, B., J. Dean, and D. Keith. 2016. Pulling together in a crisis? Anarchism, feminism and the limits of left-wing convergence in austerity Britain. Capital and Class 40 (1): 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mouffe, Chantal. 1998. The radical centre: a politics without adversary. Soundings 9: 11-23.Google Scholar
  18. Olusoga, David. 2017. Empire 2.0 is dangerous nostalgia for something that never existed. The Guardian. 19 March. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/mar/19/empire-20-is-dangerous-nostalgia-for-something-that-never-existed. Accessed 19 March 2017.
  19. Perraudin, Frances. 2015. Marauding’ migrants threaten our standard of living, says Philip Hammond. The Guardian 9 August. http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/aug/09/african-migrants-threaten-eu-standard-living-philip-hammond. Accessed 10 August 2015.
  20. Pilger, John. 2016. A blow for peace and democracy: why the British said no to Europe. In Counterpunch, June 24th. Available at http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/06/24/a-blow-for-peace-and-democracy-why-the-british-said-no-to-europe/ Accessed 27 June 2016.
  21. Polanyi, Karl. 2001. The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Porcaro, Mimmo. 2012. Occupy Lenin. In The question of strategy: socialist register 2013, ed. Leo Panich, Greg Albo, and Vivek Chibber, 82–98. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
  23. Rancière, Jacques. 2014. Hatred of democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  24. Richards, Dave and Martin Smith. 2017. “Things were better in the past”: Brexit and the Westminster fallacy of democratic nostalgia. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/81867/1/blogs.lse.ac.uk-Things%20were%20better%20in%20the%20past%20Brexit%20and%20the%20Westminster%20fallacy%20of%20democratic%20nostalgia.pdf. Accessed 3rd July 2017.
  25. Saunders, C., Roth, S. and Olcese, C. 2015. Anti-cuts protests in the UK: are we really all in this together?’ In Austerity and Protest: Popular Contention in Times of Economic Crisis, eds. Giugni, Marco and Maria T Grasso, 171-190. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Seymour, Richard. 2016. Union Jacks flutter over a widening gyre. Salvage. June 2016. http://salvage.zone/online-exclusive/union-jacks-flutter-over-a-widening-gyre/ Accessed 29June 2016.
  27. Seymour, Richard. 2017. What’s the matter with the ‘white working class’? Salvage. February 2017. http://salvage.zone/online-exclusive/whats-the-matter-with-the-white-working-class/. Accessed 13 April 2017.
  28. Smith, Gavin. 2017. Intellectuals and (counter-) politics. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  29. Somerville, Will. 2007. The immigration legacy of Tony Blair. Migration Policy Institute. http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/immigration-legacy-tony-blair Accessed 4 May 2017.
  30. Streek, Wolfgang. 2016. How will capitalism end? Essays on a failing system. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  31. Watkins, Susan. 2016. Casting off? New Left Review 100 July–August, 5–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Political Science and SociologyNational University of Ireland GalwayGalwayRepublic of Ireland

Personalised recommendations