Dialectical Anthropology

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 397–413 | Cite as

The Bible and anthropocentrism: putting humans in their place

  • Ronald A. SimkinsEmail author


Can religion contribute to a better, more ecologically balanced treatment of the environment? Since a seminal essay by Lynn White, this question has often been answered in the negative. There he exposed the dominant anthropocentric reading of the biblical tradition that has characterized the worldview of Western Christianity. This worldview provided the conditions for human exploitation of the environment. This paper will challenge the common anthropocentric reading of the Bible, arguing instead that the Bible is the product of a theocentric worldview. Humans may be singled out in the Bible for particular attention, but they are not separated out from the natural world in which they live. In the theocentric worldview of the Bible, humans and all other creatures are dependent upon God for creation and subsistence, and all alike are valuable to God as part of his creation. The world, inclusive of humans and animals, trees and plants, land and seas, belongs to God because it is God’s creation, and it is in relation to God that each part of creation has its value and worth. A non-anthropocentric reading of the Bible—putting humans in their place—provides an appropriate framework for valuing the natural world, not simply as resources for human use, but rather as the creation of God.


Anthropocentrism Bible Lynn White, Jr. Environment Theocentrism 


  1. Benedict XVI. 2007. The human family, a community of peace. Message for the 41st World Day of Peace 2008.
  2. Benedict XVI. 2009b. If you want to cultivate peace, protect creation. Message for the 43rd World Day of Peace 2010.
  3. Berlin, Adele. 2005. The wisdom of creation in Psalm 104. In Seeking out the wisdom of the ancients: Essays offered in honor of Michael V. Fox on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday, ed. R.L. Troxel, K.G. Friebel, and D.R. Magary, 71–83. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
  4. Berry, Wendell. 1993. Christianity and the survival of creation. Cross Currents 43(2): 149–163.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, William P. 2010. The seven pillars of creation: The Bible, science, and the ecology of wonder. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Childs Jr., James M. 2009. The ecology of moral authority: A response to James A. Nash, ‘the Bible vs. biodiversity: The case against moral argument from scripture.’. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 3(2): 254–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Craigie, Peter C. 1974. The comparison of Hebrew poetry: Psalm 104 in the light of Egyptian and Ugaritic poetry. Semitics 4: 10–21.Google Scholar
  8. Crenshaw, James L. 1992. When form and content clash: The theology of job 38:1–40:5. In Creation in the biblical traditions, ed. Richard J. Clifford, and John J. Collins, 70–84. Washington, DC: The Catholic Biblical Association of America.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, Ellen F. 2009. The Agrarian perspective of the Bible: A response to James A. Nash, ‘The Bible vs. biodiversity: The case against moral argument from scripture.’. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 3(2): 260–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deane-Drummond, Celia. 2009. Response to James A. Nash, ‘The Bible vs. biodiversity: The case against moral argument from scripture’. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 3(2): 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dick, Michael B. 2006. The Neo-Assyrian royal lion hunt and Yahweh’s answer to Job. Journal of Biblical Literature 125(2): 243–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Faramelli, Norm. 2009. Whither the Bible in environmental ethics and moral argument. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 3(2): 266–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feldt, Laura. 2012. Wilderness and Hebrew Bible religion—Fertility, apostasy and religious transformation in the Pentateuch. In Wilderness in mythology and religion: Approaching religious spatialities, cosmologies, and ideas of wild nature, ed. Laura Feldt, 55–94. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grey, William. 1998. Environmental value and anthropocentrism. Ethics and the Environment 3(1): 97–103.Google Scholar
  15. Gottlieb, Roger S. 2007. Religious environmentalism: What it is, where it’s heading and why we should be going in the same direction. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 1(1): 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hargrove, Eugene C. 1992. Weak anthropocentric intrinsic value. The Monist 75(2): 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrelson, Walter. 1975. Of God’s care for the earth: Psalm 104. Currents in Theology and Mission 2(1): 19–22.Google Scholar
  18. Hiebert, Theodore. 1996. The Yahwist’s landscape: Nature and religion in early Israel. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffman, Andrew J., and Lloyd E. Sandelands. 2005. Getting right with nature: Anthropocentrism, ecocentrism, and theocentrism. Organization and Environment 18(2): 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horrell, David G. 2010. The Bible and the environment: Towards a critical ecological biblical theology. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  21. Jenkins, Willis. 2009. After Lynn White: Religious ethics and environmental problems. Journal of Religious Ethics 37(2): 283–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kay, Jeanne. 1989. Human dominion over nature in the Hebrew Bible. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 79: 214–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keller, David (ed.). 2010. Environmental ethics: The big questions. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Levenson, Jon D. 1988. Creation and the persistence of evil: The Jewish Drama of divine omnipotence. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  25. Limburg, James. 1994. Down-To-earth theology: Psalm 104 and the environment. Currents in Theology and Mission 21(5): 340–346.Google Scholar
  26. Mays, James Luther. 2006. The self in the Psalms and the image of God. In God and human dignity, ed. R. Kendall Soulen, and Linda Woodhead, 27–43. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  27. McDaniel, Jay. 2009. The Manyness of God: A tribute to James Nash. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 3(2): 290–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Midgley, Mary. 1994 The end of anthropocentrism? In Philosophy and the natural environment, ed. Robin Attfield and Andrew Belsey, 103–112. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Minteer, Ben A., and Robert E. Manning. 2005. An appraisal of the critique of anthropocentrism and three lesser known themes in Lynn White’s ‘The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis’. Organization and Environment 15(2): 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mizzoni, John. 2008. Franciscan biocentrism and the Franciscan tradition. Ethics and the Environment 13(1): 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nash, James A. 2009. The Bible vs. biodiversity: The case against moral argument from scripture. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 3(2): 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Northcott, Michael. 2009. Loving scripture and nature. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 3(2): 247–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Norton, Bryan G. 1984. Environmental ethics and weak anthropocentrism. Environmental Ethics 6: 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Robb, Carol S. 2009. Biblical authority to advocate for biodiversity: A response to James A. Nash. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 3(2): 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rolston III, Holmes. 1996. The Bible and ecology. Interpretation 50(1): 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ruether, Rosemary Radford. 2011. Ecology and theology: Ecojustice at the center of the Church’s mission. Interpretation 65(4): 354–363.Google Scholar
  37. Schifferdecker, Kathryn. 2008. Out of the whirlwind: Creation theology in the book of job. Cambridge: Harvard Theological Studies.Google Scholar
  38. Simkins, Ronald A. 1994. Creator and creation: Nature in the worldview of ancient Israel. Peabody: Hendrickson.Google Scholar
  39. Spitler, Gene. 1982. Justifying a respect for nature. Environmental Ethics 4: 255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taylor, Bron. 2010. Dark green religion: Nature spirituality and the planetary future. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  41. Tucker, Gene. 1997. Rain on a land where no one lives: The Hebrew Bible on the environment. Journal of Biblical Literature 116: 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tucker, Gene. 2000. The peaceable kingdom and a covenant with the wild animals. In God who creates: Essays in Honor of W. Sibley Towner, ed. William P. Brown, and S.Dean McBride Jr., 215–225. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  43. Westermann, Claus. 1978. Blessing in the Bible and the life of the Church. Overtures to biblical theology (trans: Crim, K.) Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
  44. White Jr., Lynn. 1967. The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science 155: 1203–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Whitekettle, Richard. 2011. A communion of subjects: Zoological classification and human/animal relations in Psalm 104. Bulletin for Biblical Research 21(2): 173–188.Google Scholar
  46. Whitney, Elspeth. 1993. Lynn White, ecotheology, and history. Environmental Ethics 15: 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zaleha, Bernard Daley. 2009. James Nash as Christian deep ecologist: Forging a new eco-theology for the third millennium. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture 3(2): 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Creighton UniversityOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations