Skip to main content
Log in

On the ethics and practice of contemporary social theory: from crisis talk to multiattentional method

  • Published:
Dialectical Anthropology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using an approach derived from the anthropology and sociology of knowledge, this article explores the historical emergence of European social theory and its contemporary place in the human sciences. I direct ethnographic attention to a sense of crisis or impasse in social theory’s capacity to frame and to analyze the complexity of contemporary relations in the world. By reanalyzing this crisis talk as a phenomenological reaction to the growing (sub)specialization of social theory, I offer a new way of thinking about social theory in terms of specialized analytical attentions. I also suggest how we can move from crisis talk to a new ethics of theoretical complementarity, inspired by Dilthey, which I term “multiattentional method.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, A. 1988. The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1988. Homo academicus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 2000. Pascalian meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, D. 2003. The medium of foucault in anthropology. The minnesota review 58–60:265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, D. 2005. Spirit and system. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. 1988. Introduction to the human sciences. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1971. The order of things. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and punish. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 2000. In Power, ed. J. Faubion. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. 1900. Die Traumdeutung. In Gesammelte Schriften, ed. A. Freud, and A.J. Storfer, 2–3. Vienna: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag.

  • Freud, S. 1919. Das Unheimliche. In Gesammelte Schriften, ed. A. Freud, and A.J. Storfer, 10. Vienna: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, D.R., and G.E. Marcus. 2005. Cultures of expertise and the management of globalization: Toward the re-functioning of ethnography. In Global assemblages, ed. A. Ong, and S.J. Collier. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. 1907. Pragmatism. New York: Longman Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarausch, K.H. 1982. Students, Society and politics in imperial Germany: The rise of academic illiberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 1987. Science in action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 1993. We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. 1936. Ideology and Utopia: An introduction to the sociology of knowledge. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. 1993. The problem of a sociology of knowledge. In From Karl Mannheim, ed. K.H. Wolff. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. 1971/1844. Die entfremdete Arbeit. In Frühe Schriften, Band I. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

  • Marx, K. 1971/1846 Die deutsche Ideologie. In Frühe Schriften, Band II. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyazaki, H., and A. Riles. 2005. Failure as an endpoint. In Global assemblages, ed. A. Ong, and S.J. Collier. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montesquieu, C.S. 1989/1748. The spirit of the laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. 1994/1886. Jenseits von Gut und Böse. In Werke, ed. R. Toman. Köln: Könemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obeyesekere, G. 1990. The work of culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postone, M. 1980. Antisemitism and national socialism: Notes on the German reaction to the holocaust. New German Critique 19: 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P. 1999. French DNA: Trouble in purgatory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringer, F.K. 1969. The decline of the German Mandarins: The German academic community, 1890–1933. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J. 1987/1754. Discourse on the origin of inequality. In The basic political writings, ed. D.A. Cress. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward. 1983. The world, the text and the critic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1992/1919. Poltik als Beruf. Stuttgart: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, L. 1994. Inventing Eastern Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zizek, S. 2006. The parallax view. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank George Marcus whose Center for Ethnography at UC-Irvine sponsored the lectures from which this article is drawn. For brilliant commentary on, and criticism of, those lectures James Faubion and Kaushik Sunder Rajan earned my deep thanks and praise. I would like to thank a group of students past and present who took the time to read an earlier draft of this text and to weigh in with insights of their own: Jaideep Chatterjee, Jess Falcone, Daena Funahashi, Drew Johnson, Towns Middleton, Jen Shannon, Eli Thorkelson and Marcus Dubois Watson. And, not least, I am grateful to Kirk Dombrowski and George Baca for their much-needed encouragement and openness to publishing this essay at Dialectical Anthropology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominic Boyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyer, D. On the ethics and practice of contemporary social theory: from crisis talk to multiattentional method. Dialect Anthropol 34, 305–324 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-009-9141-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-009-9141-6

Keywords

Navigation