Skip to main content
Log in

Creative Social Research: Rethinking Theories and Methods and the Calling of an Ontological Epistemology of Participation

  • Published:
Dialectical Anthropology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern social research, as we know it now, emerged as a part of rise of modern social sciences in the context of transition to modernity. As an enterprise of modernity social research reflected some of the foundational assumptions of modernity. For example, the project of sociology was closely tied to the project of nation-state, embodying in its epistemology methodological nationalism. Social research also proceeded within the bounded logic of disciplines. But all these assumptions of modernity as well as their social manifestations have been subjected to fundamental criticisms and interrogations in the last decades. Both anti-systematic socio-cultural movements and critical discursive movements and new movements of ideas have challenged the modernist paradigms of pathology and normality as well as distinction between ontology and epistemology. In the background of critiques of modernity, social movements and processes of transformations the present essay submits some proposals for a creative and critical social research. It explores ways of moving beyond mere denunciations and critiques and embodying transformational theories and methods which would facilitate creative and critical research. The essay also calls for a new vocation of social research by pleading for a simultaneous engagement in activism and creative understanding, fieldwork and philosophical reflections, ontological self-cultivation and epistemic labour of learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • B. Agarwala, Humanities and Social Sciences in the New Millennium: Therorizing in / for Society as Play, in A. K. Giri ed., Creative Social Rethinking Theories and Methods (Lexington Books, 2004), 253–272

  • Alversson M., Skoldberg K. (2000) Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Ankersmith F. R. (2001) The Sublime Dissociation of the Past: Or How to Be (Come) What One is No Longer, History and Theory 40(3), 295–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. R. Ankersmith, Aesthetic Politics (Standford University Press, 1996)

  • Ankersmith F. R. (2002) Political Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai A. (2000) Grassroots Globalization and Research Imagination, Public Culture 12(1), 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth F. (2002) Anthropology of Knowledge, Current Anthropology 43(1), 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman Z. (2001) The Individualized Society. Cambridge: Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U. (2000) The Brave New World of Work. Cambridge: Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U. (2002) The Cosmopolitan Society and its Enemies. Theory, Culture and Society 19(1–2), 17–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U., E. Beck-Gernsheim (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love. Cambridge: Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin I. (2001) The Power of Ideas. NY: Pimlico

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson H. (1912) Creative Evolution. London: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Beteille, “Homo Hierarchicus, Home Equalis,” in idem: The Idea of Natural Inequality and Other Essays (Oxford University Press, Delhi, 1983)

  • Beteille A. (2000) Antinomies of Society. Delhi: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Beteille A. (2002) Sociology: Essays on Approach and Method. Delhi: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar R. (2002a) Reflections on Meta-Reality: Transcendence. Everyday Life and Emancipations, New Delhi: Sage Publication

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar R. (2002b) Meta-Reality. The Philosophy of meta-Reality, Volume I. A philosophy for the present. Creativity, Love and Freedom. The Bhaskar Series, New Delhi/Thousand Oaks/London: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P. (1990) In Other Words: Towards a Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Bourdieu, “Epilogue: On the Possibility of a Field of World Sociology,” in P. Bourdieu and J. S. Coleman, eds., Social Theory for a Changing Society (Westview, Boulder, 1991a), 373–387

  • P. Bourdieu, The Political Ontology of Martin Heidegger (Tr. Peter Collier) (Polity Press, Cambridge, 1991b)

  • P. Bourdieu, “The Practice of Reflexive Sociology (Paris Workshop), ” in P. Bourdieu and J.␣D.␣Wacquant, eds., An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (Polity Press, Cambridge, 1992)

  • Bourdieu P. (2000) Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P. (2003) Participant Objectivation. Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S) 9, 281–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P., L. J. D. Wacquant (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Carretto J. (ed.) (1999) Religion and Culture by Michel Foucault. Manchester: Manchester University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Chakraborthy, “The Irrelevance of Methodlogy and the art of the Possible: Reading Sen and Hirschman, “ in A.K. Giri eds., Creative Social Research: Rethinking Theories and Methods, 169–184

  • Clammer J. (1995) Difference and Modernity: Japan and Social Theory. London: Kegan Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Clammer, “Beyond Power: Alternative Conceptions of Being and Reconstitution of Social Theory,” in A. K. Giri, ed., Modern Prince and Modern (Transforming Power and Freedom, Sage, Forthcoming)

  • J. Clammer, S. Piorier, and E. Schwimmer (eds.), “Introduction: The Relevance of Ontologies in Anthropology: Reflections on a New Anthropological Field,” in J. Clammer et␣al., eds., Figured Worlds: Ontological Obstacles in Intercultural Relations (Toronto University Press, Toronto, 2004), 3–22

  • Cohen A. 1994 Self-Consiousness: An Alternative Anthropology of Identity. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly W. (2001) The Ethos of Pluralization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly W. (2002) Neuropolitics. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr F. (1984) Polis and Praxis: Exercises in Contemporary Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr F. (1987) Critical Encounters: between Philosophy and Politics. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr F. (1991) Between Freiburg and Frankfurt: Toward a Critical Ontology. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr F. (1993) The Other Heidegger. Ithaca: Cornell University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr F. (1996) Beyond Orientalism: Essays on Cross-Cultural Encounter. Albany: SUNY Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr F. (1998) Alternative Visions: Pathways in the Global Village. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Dallmayr, Homelessness and Homecoming: Heidegger on the Road (Manuscript, University of Notre Dame, 2001a)

  • F. Dallmayr, Resisting Totalizing Uniformity: Marin Heidegger on the Macht and Machenschaft,” in F. Dallmayr, ed., Achieving Our World: Toward a Global and Plural Democracy (Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, 2001b)

  • Dallmayr F. (2002) Dialouge Among Civilizations: Some Exemplary Voices. New York: Palgrave

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr, F., Peace Talks—Any Body Listening? (Forthcoming)

  • Dallmayr F. (ed.) (1999) Border Crossings: Toward a Comparative Political Theory. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Das V. 1995 Critical Events: Anthropological Perspectives on Contemporary India. Delhi: Oxford U. Press

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Das, “Whittgenstein and Anthropology,” Annual Review of Anthropology (1999)

  • Das V. (2001) Violence and Translation. Anthropological Quarterly 75(1), 105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • V. Das, “Social Sciences and the Publics,” in V. Das, ed., Introduction to The Oxford Indian Companion to Sociology and Social Anthropology (Oxford University Press, Delhi, 2003), 1–29

  • Elias N. (1991) The Society of Individuals. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Faubion J. D. (ed.) (1995) Rethinking the Subject: An Anthology of Contemporary European Social Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine M. (2002) The Mourning After. Qualitative Inquiry 8(2), 137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It can Succeed Again. Tr. Steven Sampson, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Focault M. 1984a What is Enlightment? In Rabinow P. (ed.) The Foucault Reader. NY: Pantheon Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Frietag M. (2001) The Contemporary Social Sciences and the Problem of Normativity. Theses Eleven 65, 1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fromm E. (1950) Man for Himself. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs M. (2004) Articulating the World: Social Movements, the Self-Transcendence of Society and the Question of Culture. In: A. K. Giri (eds) Creative Social Research: Rethinking Theories and Methods. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Gasper, “Anecdotes, Situations, Histories: Varieties and Uses of Cases in Thinking About Ethics and Development Practice,” in P. Q. van Ufford and A. K. Giri, eds., A Moral Critique of Development: in Search of Global Responsibilities (Routledge, London, 2003), 194–220

  • Giddens A. (1996) In Defense of Sociology: Essays. Interpretations and Rejoinders. Cambridge: Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatens M., & G. Lloyd (1999) Collective Imaginings: Spinoza, Past and Present. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz C. 1973 Interpretation of Cultures. NY: Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz C. (2000) Available Light: Philosophical Reflections on Anthropological Topics. Princeton: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • A. K. Giri, ‘Creating a Community of Discourse in Sociology in India,” Economic and Political Weekly, August 1993

  • A. K. Giri, “Self, Other and the Challenge of Culture,” in idem, Global Transformations: Postmodernity and Beyond (Rawat, Jaipur, 1998)

  • Giri A. K. (2002) Conversations and Transformations: Toward a New Ethics of Self and Society. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books and Rowman and Littlefield

    Google Scholar 

  • A. K. Giri, “Social Science Research: Call of Home and the World,” Economic and Political Weekly. August 2003

  • A. K. Giri, “Knowledge and Human Liberation: Jurgen Habermas. Sri Aurobindo and Beyond,” European Journal of Social Theory (2004)

  • Giri A. K. (2004b) Reflections and Mobilizations: Dialogues with Movements and Voluntary Organizations. New Delhi: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingrich A., R. Fox (eds.) (2002) Anthropology, By Comparison. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorz A. (1999) Reclaiming Work: Beyond the Wage-Based Society. Cambridge: Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco J. (2001) Virtues and Rules in Epistemology. In: Abrol F., L. Zagzebski (eds), Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility (pp. 117–141). Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium J. F., J. A. Holstein (eds.) (1997) The New Language of Qualitative Method. NY: Oxford U. Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J. (1971) Knowledge and Human Interest. Boston: Beacon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J. (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt M., A. Negri (2000) Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U. Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt M., A. Negri (1994) Labor of Dionysus: A Critique of the State-Form. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Hanrahan, Difference in Time: A Critical Theory of Culture (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2000)

  • Hawthorn G., 1991 Plausible Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina K. (2001) Postsocial Relations: Theorizing Society in a Postsocial Environment. In: G. Ritzer, & B. Smart (eds). Handbook of Social Theory. London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhman N. (2001) Notes on the Project ‚Poetry and Social Theory’. Theory, Culture & Society 18(1), 15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglis F. (2000) Clifford Geertz: Culture, Custom and Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Ingold, “A Circumpolar Night’s Dream,” in J. Clammer, et␣al., eds., Figured Worlds: Ontological Obstacles in Intercultural Relations (Toronto University Press, Toronto, 2004), 25–57

  • Mintz S. W. (2000) Sow’s Ears and Silver Linings: A Backward Look at Ethnography. Current Anthropology 41(2), 169–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Marcus and M. Fischer, Anthropology as Cultural Critique (Chicago, 1986)

  • Melucci A. (1996) The Playing Self: Person and Meaning in the Planetary Society. Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty J. N. (2000a) Self and Other: Philosophical Essays. Delhi: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty J. N. (2000b) Gandhi’s Truth. In: Krishna R. (eds). Fusion of Horizons: Socio-Spiritual Heritage of India. Delhi: Allied Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty J. N. (2002) Explorations in Philosophy: Western Philosophy. Delhi: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pani N. (2004) Gandhian Economic Method and the Challenge of Expediency. In: A. K. Giri (eds). Creative Social Research: Rethinking Theories and Methods. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Peacock, “Action Comparison: Efforts Towards A Global and Comparative yet Local and Active Anthropology,” in A. Gingrich and R. Fox, eds., Anthropology, By Comparison. (Routledge, London, 2002), 44–69

  • P. V. Pillai, “Hind Swaraj in the Light of Heidegger’s Critique of Modernity,” in H. Swaraj, ed., A Fresh Look (Gandhi Peace Foundation, Delhi, 1985)

  • S. Pollock, “Cosmopolitanisms,” Public Culture (2000) 12(3), 577–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarles van Ufford P., A. K. Giri (eds.) (2003) A Moral Critique of Development: In Search of Global Responsibilities. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • H. G. Ried, and B. Taylor, “Globalization, Democracy and the ‚Aesthetic Ecology of Emergent Publics’ for a Sustainable World: Working From John Dewey,” in A. K. Giri, ed., (2005) “Modern Prince and the Modern Sage: Transforming Power and Freedom”. Asian Journal of Social Theory 33(1) (Forthcoming)

  • Rorty R. (1990) Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishnan R. (2003) Theory in an Uneven World. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos B. de S. (1995) Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Sayer, Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, 2nd edn. (Routledge, London, 1992 [1984])

  • C. Schrag, The Self After Postmodernity (Yale U. Press, 1997)

  • A. Shanks, “What is Truth?” in Towards a Theological Poetics (Routledge, London, 2001)

  • A. Sen, “History as an Enterprise of Knowledge,” Frontline February 2 (2001) 86–91

  • Smith A. 1976. A Theory of Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivsan A. (1998) The Subject of Fieldwork: Malinowski and Gandhi. In: Meenakshi T. (eds). Anthropological Journeys: Reflections on Fieldwork. Hyderabad: Orient Longman

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern M. (1991) Partial Connections. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern M. 1994 Partial Connections. Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Strathern, “Foreword,” in A. Gingrich and R. Fox, eds., Anthropology, By Comparison (Routledge, London, 2002), xi–xvii

  • Strathern M. (2004) Commons and Borderlands: Working Papers on Interdisciplinarity. Accountability, and the Flow of Knowledge. Oxon, UK: Sean Kingston Publishing House

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern M. (ed) (2000) Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • van Stavern I. 2001 The Values of Economics: An Aristotelian Perpective. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sunder Rajan, “Notes Towards a Phenomenology of Historiographies,” Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, Jan-April 187–207

  • Sunder Rajan R. (1998) Beyond the Crises of European Science: Vol. 1, New Beginnings. Shimla: Institute of Advanced Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagore R. (1961) On Art and Aesthetics. Calcutta: Orient Longman

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuner B. S. (ed.) (1996) The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin S. 2001 Return to Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U. Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine A. (1977) Self-Production of Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine A. (2000) Can We Live Together? Equality and Difference. Cambridge: Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Uberoi J. P. S. 1978 Science and Culture. Delhi: Oxford U. Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Uberoi J. P. S. 1984 The Other Mind of Europe: Goethe as a Scientist. Delhi: Oxford U.Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Uberoi J. P. S. (2002) The European Modernity: Truth, Science and Method. New Delhi: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry J. (2000) Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Vattimo G. (1999) Belief. Cambridge: Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Staveren I. (2004) Caring for Economics. In: A. K. Giri (eds). Creative Social Research: Rethinking Theories and Methods. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker R.C. 1998 Contingency. in Craig E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge, p 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein I., et␣al. (1996) Open the Social Sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein I. (1999) The End of the World as We Know It: Social Science for the Twenty-First Century. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press

    Google Scholar 

  • J. H. Zammito, Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology, Chicago (2002)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ananta Kumar Giri.

Additional information

Ananta Kumar Giri originally from Madras Institute of Development Studies, Chennai, India is currently a Alexander von Humboldt Fellow at Institute of Sociology, Albert Ludwig Univesitat, Freiburg, Germany. The present essay builds upon author’s introduction to his recently edited volume, Creative Social Research: Rethinking Theories and Methods (Lanham, MD, USA: Lexington Books, 2004 & New Delhi. Sage, 2004. This has benefited from presentations in many different places, most recently at the Ernest Gellenr seminar series in Prague and Institute of Sociology, Freiburg, and my grateful to thanks are due to participants in all these places of dialogues, particularly to Professors Chitta Ranjan Das , Peter Skalnik and Hermann Shwengel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giri, A.K. Creative Social Research: Rethinking Theories and Methods and the Calling of an Ontological Epistemology of Participation. Dialect Anthropol 30, 227–271 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-007-9007-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-007-9007-8

Keywords

Navigation