Designs, Codes and Cryptography

, Volume 73, Issue 2, pp 507–527

Multi-trial Guruswami–Sudan decoding for generalised Reed–Solomon codes

Article
  • 182 Downloads

Abstract

An iterated refinement procedure for the Guruswami–Sudan list decoding algorithm for Generalised Reed–Solomon codes based on Alekhnovich’s module minimisation is proposed. The method is parametrisable and allows variants of the usual list decoding approach. In particular, finding the list of closest codewords within an intermediate radius can be performed with improved average-case complexity while retaining the worst-case complexity. We provide a detailed description of the module minimisation, reanalysing the Mulders–Storjohann algorithm and drawing new connections to both Alekhnovich’s algorithm and Lee–O’Sullivan’s. Furthermore, we show how to incorporate the re-encoding technique of Kötter and Vardy into our iterative algorithm.

Keywords

Guruswami–Sudan List decoding Multi-trial Reed–Solomon codes Re-encoding transformation 

Mathematics Subject Classification

68P30 94B35 

References

  1. 1.
    Alekhnovich M.: Linear diophantine equations over polynomials and soft decoding of Reed–Solomon codes. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 51(7), 2257–2265 (2005).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bassalygo L.A.: New upper bounds for error-correcting codes. Prob. Inf. Trans. 1(4), 41–44 (1965).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beelen P., Brander K.: Key equations for list decoding of Reed–Solomon codes and how to solve them. J. Symb. Comput. 45(7), 773–786 (2010).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beelen P., Høholdt T., Nielsen J.S.R., Wu Y.: On rational interpolation-based list-decoding and list-decoding binary Goppa codes. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 59(6), 3269–3281 (2013).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bernstein D.J.: List decoding for binary Goppa codes. In: IWCC, LNCS, vol. 6639, pp. 62–80. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brander K.: Interpolation and list decoding of algebraic codes. Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Denmark (2010).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cassuto Y., Bruck J., McEliece R.: On the average complexity of Reed–Solomon list decoders. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 59(4), 2336–2351 (2013).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chowdhury M.F.I., Jeannerod C.P., Neiger V., Schost E., Villard G.: Faster algorithms for multivariate interpolation with multiplicities and simultaneous polynomial approximations. arXiv:1402.0643 (2014). http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0643.
  9. 9.
    von zur Gathen J., Gerhard J.: Modern Computer Algebra. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giorgi P., Jeannerod C., Villard G.: On the complexity of polynomial matrix computations. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation, pp. 135–142. ACM (2003).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guruswami V., Sudan M.: Improved decoding of Reed–Solomon codes and algebraic geometry codes. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 45(6), 1757–1767 (1999).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnson S.M.: A new upper bound for error-correcting codes. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 46, 203–207 (1962).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kötter R., Vardy A.: A complexity reducing transformation in algebraic list decoding of Reed–Solomon codes. In: IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW), pp. 10–13. Paris, France (2003).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kötter R., Vardy A.: Algebraic soft-decision decoding of Reed–Solomon codes. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 49(11), 2809–2825 (2003).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kötter R., Ma J., Vardy A.: The re-encoding transformation in algebraic list-decoding of Reed–Solomon codes. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 57(2), 633–647 (2011).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee K., O’Sullivan M.E.: List decoding of Reed–Solomon codes from a Gröbner basis perspective. J. Symb. Comput. 43(9), 645–658 (2008).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lenstra A.: Factoring multivariate polynomials over finite fields. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 30(2), 235–248 (1985).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mulders T., Storjohann A.: On lattice reduction for polynomial matrices. J. Symb. Comput. 35(4), 377–401 (2003).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nielsen J.S.R.: List decoding of algebraic codes. Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby (2013).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nielsen J.S.R., Zeh A.: Multi-trial Guruswami–Sudan decoding for generalised Reed–Solomon codes. In: Workshop on Coding and Cryptography (2013).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roth R., Ruckenstein G.: Efficient decoding of Reed–Solomon codes beyond half the minimum distance. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 46(1), 246–257 (2000).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stein W., et al.: Sage Mathematics Software (Version 5.13, Release Date: 2013-12-15). The Sage Development Team (2013). http://www.sagemath.org.
  23. 23.
    Sudan M.: Decoding of Reed–Solomon codes beyond the error-correction bound. J. Complex. 13(1), 180–193 (1997).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tang S., Chen L., Ma X.: Progressive list-enlarged algebraic soft decoding of Reed–Solomon codes. IEEE Commun. Lett. 16(6), 901–904 (2012).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zeh A., Gentner C., Augot D.: An interpolation procedure for list decoding Reed–Solomon codes based on generalized key equations. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 57(9), 5946–5959 (2011).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Communications EngineeringUniversity of UlmUlmGermany
  2. 2.Research Center INRIA Saclay - Île-de-France, École PolytechniquePalaiseau, ParisFrance
  3. 3.Computer Science DepartmentTechnion—Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations