Designs, Codes and Cryptography

, Volume 66, Issue 1–3, pp 275–289 | Cite as

A complete characterization of irreducible cyclic orbit codes and their Plücker embedding



Constant dimension codes are subsets of the finite Grassmann variety. The study of these codes is a central topic in random linear network coding theory. Orbit codes represent a subclass of constant dimension codes. They are defined as orbits of a subgroup of the general linear group on the Grassmannian. This paper gives a complete characterization of orbit codes that are generated by an irreducible cyclic group, i.e. a group having one generator that has no non-trivial invariant subspace. We show how some of the basic properties of these codes, the cardinality and the minimum distance, can be derived using the isomorphism of the vector space and the extension field. Furthermore, we investigate the Plücker embedding of these codes and show how the orbit structure is preserved in the embedding.


Network coding Constant dimension codes Grassmannian Plücker embedding Projective space General linear group 

Mathematics Subject Classification



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ahlswede R., Cai N., Li S.-Y.R., Yeung R.W.: Network information flow. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theor. 46, 1204–1216 (2000)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elsenhans A., Kohnert A., Wassermann A.: Construction of codes for network coding. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems—MTNS, pp. 1811–1814. Budapest (2010).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Etzion T., Silberstein N.: Error-correcting codes in projective spaces via rank-metric codes and Ferrers diagrams. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theor. 55(7), 2909–2919 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hirschfeld J.W.P.: Projective Geometries Over Finite Fields. Oxford Mathematical Monographs 2nd edn. The Clarendon Press Oxford University Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hodge W.V.D., Pedoe D.: Methods of Algebraic Geometry, Vol. II. Cambridge University Press (1952).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kohnert A., Kurz S.: Construction of large constant dimension codes with a prescribed minimum distance. In: Jacques C., Willi G., Müller-Quade Jörn (eds.), MMICS, vol. 5393 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, pp. 31–42 (2008).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kötter R., Kschischang F.R.: Coding for errors and erasures in random network coding. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theor. 54(8), 3579–3591 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lidl R., Niederreiter H.: Introduction to Finite Fields and their Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge London (1986)MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Manganiello F., Gorla E., Rosenthal J.: Spread codes and spread decoding in network coding. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, pp. 851–855. Toronto, Canada (2008).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Manganiello F., Trautmann A.-L., Rosenthal J.: On conjugacy classes of subgroups of the general linear group and cyclic orbit codes. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, pp. 1916–1920, 31, 5 Aug (2011).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Manganiello F., Trautmann A.-L.: Spread decoding in extension fields. arXiv:1108.5881v1 [cs.IT], (2011).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Silva D., Kschischang F.R., Kötter R.: A rank-metric approach to error control in random network coding. Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Inf. Theor. 54(9), 3951–3967 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Trautmann A.-L., Manganiello F., Rosenthal J.: Orbit codes—a new concept in the area of network coding. In: Information Theory Workshop (ITW), IEEE, pp. 1–4, Dublin August (2010).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of MathematicsUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations