Skip to main content
Log in

The equivalence between optimal detecting arrays and super-simple OAs

  • Published:
Designs, Codes and Cryptography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The notion of a detecting array (DTA) was proposed, recently, by Colbourn and McClary in their research on software interaction tests. Roughly speaking, testing with a (d, t)−DTA(N, k, v) can locate d interaction faults and detect whether there are more than d interaction faults. In this paper, we establish a general lower bound on sizes of DTAs and explore an equivalence between optimal DTAs and super-simple orthogonal arrays (OAs). Taking advantage of this equivalence, a great number of DTAs are constructed, which are all optimal in the sense of their sizes. In particular, an optimal (2, t)−DTA(N, 5, v) of strength t = 2 or 3 is shown to exist whenever v ≥ 3 excepting \({(t, v) \in \{(2, 3), (2, 6),(3, 4), (3, 6)\}}\) .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beth T., Jungnickel D., Lenz H.: Design Theory, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bush K.A.: Orthogonal arrays of index unity. Ann. Math. Stat. 23, 426–434 (1952)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bush K.A.: A generalization of the theorem due to MacNeish. Ann. Math. Stat. 23, 293–295 (1952)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Colbourn C.J.: Combinatorial aspects of covering arrays. Le Matematiche (Catania) 58, 121–167 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Colbourn C.J.: Strength two covering arrays: existence tables and projection. Discrete Math. 308, 772–786 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Colbourn C.J., Dinitz J.H.: The CRC Handbook of Combinatorial Designs, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Colbourn C.J., McClary D.W.: Locating and detecting arrays for interaction faults. J. Comb. Optim. 15, 17–48 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Colbourn C.J., Martirosyan S.S., Mullen G.L., Shasha D.E., Sherwood G.B., Yucas J.L.: Products of mixed covering arrays of strength two. J. Combin. Des. 14, 124–138 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hedayat A.S., Slone N.J.A., Stufken J.: Orthogonal Arrays. Springer, New York (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ji L., Yin J.: Constructions of new orthogonal arrays and covering arrays of strength three. J. Combin. Theory (A) 117, 236–247 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. MacNeish H.F.: Euler squares. Ann. Math. NY 23, 221–227 (1922)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Martinez C., Moura L., Panario D., Stevens B.: Locating error using ELAs, covering arrays, and adaptive testing algorithms. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 23, 1776–1799 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Shi C., Tang Y., Yin J.: Optimal locating arrays for at most two faults (submitted).

  14. Tang Y., Yin J.: Detecting arrays and optimality. Acta Math. Sin. (to appear).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianxing Yin.

Additional information

Communicated by C. J. Colbourn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shi, C., Tang, Y. & Yin, J. The equivalence between optimal detecting arrays and super-simple OAs. Des. Codes Cryptogr. 62, 131–142 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10623-011-9498-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10623-011-9498-9

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation