Skip to main content
Log in

Local Schur’s Lemma and Commutative Semifields

  • Published:
Designs, Codes and Cryptography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A set of linear maps \(\cal{R}\subset GL(V,K)\), V a finite vector space over a field K, is regular if to each \(x,y\in V^*\) there corresponds a unique element \(R\in\cal{R}\) such that R(x)=y. In this context, Schur’s lemma implies that \(\overline{\cal{R}}=\cal{R}\cup \{ 0\}\) is a field if (and only if) it consists of pairwise commuting elements. We consider when \(\cal{R}\) is locally commutative: at some μ ∈V*, AB(μ)=BA(μ) for all \(A,B \in \cal{R}\), and \(\cal{R}\) has been normalized to contain the identity. We show that such locally commutative \(\cal{R}\) are equivalent to commutative semifields, generalizing a result of Ganley, and hence characterizing commutative semifield spreads within the class of translation planes. This enables the determination of the orders |V| for which all locally commutative \(\cal{R}\) on V are (globally) commutative. Similarly, we determine a sharp upperbound for the maximum size of the Schur kernel associated with strictly locally commutative \(\cal{R}\). We apply our main result to demonstrate the existence of a partial spread of degree 5, with nominated shears axis, that cannot be extend to a commutative semifield spread. Finally, we note that although local commutativity for a regular linear set \(\cal{R}\) implies that the set of Lie products \([\cal{R},\cal{R}]\) consists entirely of singular maps, the converse is false.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Beth, D. Jungnickel, H. Lenz, Design Theory, Vol. 2, 2nd edn., Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Applications Cambridge University Press. Vol. 78 (1999).

  2. M. Biliotti V. Jha N.L. Johnson (2001) Foundations of Translation Planes Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S.D. Cohen M.J. Ganley (1982) ArticleTitleCommutative semifields two dimensional over their middle nuclei Journal of Algebra. 75 373–385 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0021-8693(82)90045-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Dembowski (1968) Finite Geometries Springer Verlag New York.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ganley M.J. (1972) Polarities in translation planes, Geometriae Dedicata Vol. 1 pp. 103–116.

  6. Hughes D.R., Piper F.C. (1973). Projective Planes, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, Vol. 6

  7. V. Jha G. P. Wene (1993) The structure of the central units of a commutative semifield plane (Deinze, 1992) F. De Clerk (Eds) Finite Geometry and Combinatorics, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., 191 Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge 207–216

    Google Scholar 

  8. D.E. Knuth (1965) ArticleTitleFinite Semifields and Projective Plane Journal of Algebra. 2 182–217 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0021-8693(65)90018-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Lüneburg (1980) Translation Planes Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vikram Jha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jha, V. Local Schur’s Lemma and Commutative Semifields. Des Codes Crypt 36, 203–216 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10623-004-1705-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10623-004-1705-5

Keywords

Navigation