Skip to main content
Account

Table 4 Regression analysis for factors predicting DAE

From: Prophylactic Rectal ESD (Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection) Defect Closure and Post-ESD Clinical Outcomes: An International Multi-Center Study (with Video)

 

DAE with, n (%)

DAE without, n (%)

Logistic regression analysis

Exp (B)

p-value

Chronic anticoagulant use

6 (16%)

15 (4%)

5.04

 < 0.01

NICE 3

4 (16%)

17 (5%)

3.54

0.046

Incomplete resection

6 (17%)

15 (4%)

6.38

 < 0.01

Traction use

7 (11.9%)

14 (4.3%)

1.38

0.59

Procedure time, minutes, mean (s.d.) [DAE v no DAE]

209.7 (158.3)

139.6 (99.8)

0.99

0.38

Size of lesion in cm, mean (s.d.) [DAE v no DAE]

6.1 (4.1)

4.7 (2.7)

0.91

0.18

  1. A p-value of < 0.05 is considered to be statistically significant