Skip to main content
Log in

Erythromycin Improves the Quality of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Network Meta-Analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background/Aim

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) usually requires esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for diagnostic and—potentially—therapeutic purposes. However, blood within the gastric lumen may hinder the procedure. Administration of prokinetics like erythromycin has shown efficacy. This network meta-analysis investigates the efficacy of this intervention prior to EGD.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search of Embase, PubMed/Medline, and other databases through March 8, 2022 to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing prokinetic use in EGD for UGIB. We used the DerSimonian-Laird approach to pool data and compare outcomes including need for repeat endoscopy and blood transfusion. Pooled prevalence of proportional outcomes, 95% confidence interval (CI), and p-values were calculated.

Results

We included eight RCTs with four distinct intervention groups (erythromycin, placebo to erythromycin, nasogastric (NG) lavage and NG lavage + erythromycin) published between 2002 and 2020 with a total of 721 patients (mean age 60.0 ± 3.1 years; 73.2% male). The need for second look endoscopy was significantly lower with erythromycin than placebo (relative risk: 0.42, CI 0.22–0.83, p = 0.01). Using the frequentist approach, the combination of NG lavage and erythromycin (92.2) was rated highest, followed by erythromycin alone (73.1) for higher rates of empty stomach. Erythromycin was rated highest for lower need for packed red blood cell transfusion (72.8) as well as mean endoscopy duration (66.0).

Conclusion

Erythromycin improved visualization at EGD, reduced requirements for blood transfusion and repeat EGD, and shortened hospital stay. The combination of erythromycin and NG lavage showed reduced mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laine L, Yang H, Chang SC, Datto C. Trends for incidence of hospitalization and death due to GI complications in the United States from 2001 to 2009. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1190–1195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oakland K. Changing epidemiology and etiology of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2019;42–43:101610.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wuerth BA, Rockey DC. Changing epidemiology of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the last decade: a Nationwide analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2018;63:1286–1293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-017-4882-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Laine L, Barkun AN, Saltzman JR, Martel M, Leontiadis GI. ACG clinical guideline: upper gastrointestinal and ulcer bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116:899–917.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Laine L, Jensen DM. Management of patients with ulcer bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:345–360.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rahman R, Nguyen DL, Sohail U et al. Pre-endoscopic erythromycin administration in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an updated meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Gastroenterol. 2016;29:312–317.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Barkun AN, Bardou M, Martel M, Gralnek IM, Sung J. Response. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:234–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barkun AN, Bardou M, Martel M, Gralnek IM, Sung JJY. Prokinetics in acute upper GI bleeding: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:1138–1145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Na HK, Jung HY, Seo DW et al. Erythromycin infusion prior to endoscopy for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Korean J Intern Med. 2017;32:1002–1009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ali Shah SA, Nadeem M, Jameel M, Yasmin R, Afsar A, Riaz F. Oral erythromycin improves the quality of endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients. Cureus 2020;12:e10204.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann intern Med. 2015;162:777–784.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–560.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Ades AE. Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2010;29:932–944.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rücker G, Schwarzer G. Resolve conflicting rankings of outcomes in network meta-analysis: partial ordering of treatments. Res Synth Methods 2017;8:526–536.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Y, Akl EA, Schünemann HJ. Using systematic reviews in guideline development: the GRADE approach. Res Synth Methods 2019;10:312–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Higgins J, Altman D, Gotzsche P et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011;343:d5928.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Altraif I, Handoo FA, Aljumah A et al. Effect of erythromycin before endoscopy in patients presenting with variceal bleeding: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:245–250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Javad Ehsani Ardakani M, Zare E, Basiri M, Mohaghegh Shalmani H. Erythromycin decreases the time and improves the quality of EGD in patients with acute upper GI bleeding. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2013;6:195–201.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Carbonell N, Pauwels A, Serfaty L, Boelle PY, Becquemont L, Poupon R. Erythromycin infusion prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1211–1215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Coffin B, Pocard M, Panis Y et al. Erythromycin improves the quality of EGD in patients with acute upper GI bleeding: a randomized controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:174–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Frossard JL, Spahr L, Queneau PE et al. Erythromycin intravenous bolus infusion in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Gastroenterology 2002;123:17–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pateron D, Vicaut E, Debuc E et al. Erythromycin infusion or gastric lavage for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57:582–589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Farzam K, Nessel TA, Quick J. Erythromycin. StatPearls [Internet]. [Treasure Island (FL)]: Khashayar Farzam. [Revised 2021 Dec 13; cited 2022 Jun 1]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532249/

  24. Urbain JL, Vantrappen G, Janssens J, Van Cutsem E, Peeters T, De Roo M. Intravenous erythromycin dramatically accelerates gastric emptying in gastroparesis diabeticorum and normals and abolishes the emptying discrimination between solids and liquids. J Nucl Med. 1990;31:1490–1493.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maganti K, Onyemere K, Jones MP. Oral erythromycin and symptomatic relief of gastroparesis: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:259–263.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lewis K, Alqahtani Z, McIntyre L et al. The efficacy and safety of prokinetic agents in critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Crit Care 2016;20:259.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Winstead NS, Wilcox CM. Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:1371–1377.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Aljebreen AM, Fallone CA, Barkun AN. Nasogastric aspirate predicts high-risk endoscopic lesions in patients with acute upper-GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:172–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pasha SF, Shergill A, Acosta RD et al. The role of endoscopy in the patient with lower GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:875–885.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hindley K, Fenton C, McIntosh J. A systematic review of enteral feeding by nasogastric tube in young people with eating disorders. J Eat Disord. 2021;9:90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wolfe TR, Fosnocht DE, Linscott MS. Atomized lidocaine as topical anesthesia for nasogastric tube placement: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;35:421–425.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ritz MA, Chapman MJ, Fraser RJ et al. Erythromycin dose of 70 mg accelerates gastric emptying as effectively as 200 mg in the critically ill. Intensiv Care Med. 2005;31:949–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MA and HH: Planning and conducting the study, collecting, interpreting data, statistical analysis, drafting the manuscript. MKG, SW, ARP, MKR, LBS, ZAA, and FK: collecting, interpreting data, drafting the manuscript. WLS: Created the search strategy and collected data, critical revision of manuscript. AN and CWH: Study design and conception, supervision, critical revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Aziz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 95 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aziz, M., Haghbin, H., Gangwani, M.K. et al. Erythromycin Improves the Quality of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Network Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis Sci 68, 1435–1446 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-022-07698-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-022-07698-z

Keywords

Navigation