Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Liver Biopsy in Pregnancy: Two Case Reports and Review of the Literature

Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The etiology of most cases of liver diseases in pregnancy can be diagnosed with a thorough history, physical examination, laboratory values, serology, and noninvasive imaging. However, atypical clinical and laboratory presentations of liver diseases/chemistries require a liver biopsy to render an accurate diagnosis in cases where the biopsy results affect the timing of delivery or impact choice of medical therapy. According to the American College of Gastroenterology, liver biopsy can be effectively and safely conducted in pregnant women. Conventional routes of performing a liver biopsy include the percutaneous, transjugular route, and surgical methods. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy is a recent technique that has not yet gained widespread adoption but can potentially serve as an alternative route for obtaining the liver sample. Adverse events associated with liver biopsy include abdominal pain and hemorrhage. Maternal and fetal outcomes are limited to increased risk of preterm birth and small for gestational age neonate. However, very few studies have formally evaluated the safety of liver biopsy in pregnant women. In this review, we present two successful cases of liver biopsy performed during pregnancy and summarize the most recent evidence regarding the safety and outcomes of the procedure in pregnancy to assist clinicians in their decision to perform a liver biopsy during pregnancy or postpone it until after delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Uchikova EH, Ledjev II. Changes in haemostasis during normal pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;119:185–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.06.038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ozkan S, Ceylan Y, Ozkan OV, Yildirim S. Review of a challenging clinical issue: intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:7134–7141. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i23.7134.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ellington SR, Flowers L, Legardy-Williams JK, Jamieson DJ, Kourtis AP. Recent trends in hepatic diseases during pregnancy in the United States, 2002–2010. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:524.e1–524.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hospital HF. Newly Approved Ultrasound Device Eliminates Risks and Pain of Liver Biopsy 2013.

  5. Frederiksen MC. Physiologic changes in pregnancy and their effect on drug disposition. Semin Perinatol. 2001;25:120–123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson KD, Perisetti A, Thandassery R, et al. Laboratory evaluation of deranged liver chemistries in pregnancy. J Lab Precis Med. 2019;5:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goyal H, May E. Roadmap for evaluation of abnormal liver chemistries. J Lab Precis Med. 2017;2:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rockey DC, Caldwell SH, Goodman ZD, Nelson RC, Smith AD. Liver biopsy. Hepatology. 2009;49:1017–1044. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.22742.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ludvigsson JF, Marschall HU, Hagstrom H, Hoijer J, Stephansson O. Pregnancy outcome in women undergoing liver biopsy during pregnancy: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Hepatology. 2018;68:625–633. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boyum JH, Atwell TD, Schmit GD, et al. Incidence and risk factors for adverse events related to image-guided liver biopsy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91:329–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.11.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tran TT, Ahn J, Reau NS. ACG clinical guideline: liver disease and pregnancy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:176–194. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2015.430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shah AR, Al-Hanayneh M, Chowdhry M, Bilal M, Singh S. Endoscopic ultrasound guided liver biopsy for parenchymal liver disease. World J Hepatol. 2019;11:335–343. https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v11.i4.335.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Janes CH, Lindor KD. Outcome of patients hospitalized for complications after outpatient liver biopsy. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:96–98. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-118-2-199301150-00003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weigand K, Weigand K. Percutaneous liver biopsy: retrospective study over 15 years comparing 287 inpatients with 428 outpatients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:792–799. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05718.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mammen T, Keshava SN, Eapen CE, et al. Transjugular liver biopsy: a retrospective analysis of 601 cases. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19:351–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2007.09.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Keshava SN, Mammen T, Surendrababu N, Moses V. Transjugular liver biopsy: what to do and what not to do. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2008;18:245–248. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.41839.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Behrens G, Ferral H. Transjugular liver biopsy. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2012;29:111–117. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1312572.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kalambokis G, Manousou P, Vibhakorn S, et al. Transjugular liver biopsy–indications, adequacy, quality of specimens, and complications–a systematic review. J Hepatol. 2007;47:284–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2007.05.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shuja A, Alkhasawneh A, Fialho A, et al. Comparison of EUS-guided versus percutaneous and transjugular approaches for the performance of liver biopsies. Dig Liver Dis. 2019;51:826–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2019.01.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Diehl DL, Johal AS, Khara HS, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a multicenter experience. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3:E210–E215. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1391412.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Stavropoulos SN, Im GY, Jlayer Z, et al. High yield of same-session EUS-guided liver biopsy by 19-gauge FNA needle in patients undergoing EUS to exclude biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:310–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gleeson FC, Levy MJ. EUS Trucut biopsy liver parenchyma acquisition and yield are comparable to that of a transjugular liver biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70(5):1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.03.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Adler DG, Muthusamy VR, Ehrlich DS, et al. A multicenter evaluation of a new EUS core biopsy needle: experience in 200 patients. Endosc Ultrasound. 2019;8:99–104. https://doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_53_17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ebert E, Sun E, Wright S, et al. Does early diagnosis and delivery in acute fatty liver of pregnancy lead to improvement in maternal and infant survival? Dig Dis Sci. 1984;29:453–455. https://doi.org/10.1155/2006/638131.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Parrott J, Shilling A, Male HJ, Holland M, Clark-Ganheart CA. Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in pregnancy: a case series and review of the current literature. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2019;2019:9695367. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9695367.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Schapiro L, Thorp JM. Diagnosis of early acute fatty liver of pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Med. 1996;5:314–316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Davidson KM, Simpson LL, Knox TA, D’Alton ME. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy in triplet gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:806–808.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gray M, Rockey DC. A spotty liver of pregnancy. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. 2014;2:2324709614551558. https://doi.org/10.1177/2324709614551558.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Sato H, Tomita K, Yasue C, et al. Pregnant woman with non-comatose autoimmune acute liver failure in the second trimester rescued using medical therapy: a case report. Hepatol Res. 2015;45:349–355.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sinclair M, Ket S, Testro A, Gow PJ, Angus PW. Acute hepatic decompensation precipitated by pregnancy-related catabolic stress: a rare mimic of acute liver failure. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:480–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Firoz T, Webber D, Rowe H. Drug-induced fulminant hepatic failure in pregnancy. Obstet Med. 2015;8:190–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753495x15598909.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Castro MA, Fassett MJ, Reynolds TB, Shaw KJ, Goodwin TM. Reversible peripartum liver failure: a new perspective on the diagnosis, treatment, and cause of acute fatty liver of pregnancy, based on 28 consecutive cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:389–395.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wei Q, Zhang L, Liu X. Clinical diagnosis and treatment of acute fatty liver of pregnancy: a literature review and 11 new cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36:751–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01242.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Barton JR, Sibai BM, Mabie WC, Shanklin DR. Recurrent acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:534–538.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Reyes H, Sandoval L, Wainstein A, et al. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: a clinical study of 12 episodes in 11 patients. Gut. 1994;35:101–106. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.35.1.101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zaffar N, Soete E, Gandhi S, Sayyar P, Van Mieghem T, D’Souza R. Pregnancy outcomes following single and repeat liver transplantation: an international 2-center cohort. Liver Transpl. 2018;24:769–778. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.25071.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Westbrook RH, Yeoman AD, Agarwal K, et al. Outcomes of pregnancy following liver transplantation: the King’s College Hospital experience. Liver Transpl. 2015;21:1153–1159. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.24182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mjahed K, Charra B, Hamoudi D, Noun M, Barrou L. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006;274:349–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0203-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nagy S, Bush MC, Berkowitz R, Fishbein TM, Gomez-Lobo V. Pregnancy outcome in liver transplant recipients. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00369-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Coffin CS, Shaheen AA, Burak KW, Myers RP. Pregnancy outcomes among liver transplant recipients in the United States: a nationwide case-control analysis. Liver Transpl. 2010;16:56–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.21906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lim TY, Gonsalkorala E, Cannon MD, et al. Successful pregnancy outcomes following liver transplantation is predicted by renal function. Liver Transpl. 2018;24:606–615. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.25034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lucey MR, Terrault N, Ojo L, et al. Long-term management of the successful adult liver transplant: 2012 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the American Society of Transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2013;19:3–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.23566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Christopher V, Al-Chalabi T, Richardson PD, et al. Pregnancy outcome after liver transplantation: a single-center experience of 71 pregnancies in 45 recipients. Liver Transpl. 2006;12:1138–1143. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.20810.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Kemmian D. Johnson, Abhilash Perisetti, Hemant Goyal helped in conception and design. Kemmian D. Johnson, Abhilash Perisetti, Hemant Goyal contributed to literature search. Kemmian D. Johnson helped in first draft. All authors were involved in critical revision and editing and final approval.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hemant Goyal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This manuscript, as submitted or its essence in another version, is not under consideration for publication elsewhere and will not be published elsewhere while under review by Digestive Diseases and Sciences. All authors have made substantive contributions to the study, and all authors endorse the data and conclusions.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnson, K.D., Perisetti, A., Goyal, H. et al. Liver Biopsy in Pregnancy: Two Case Reports and Review of the Literature. Dig Dis Sci 66, 4090–4098 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06786-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06786-2

Keywords

Navigation