Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Gender Disparity in Academic Gastroenterology: Beginning of the End of the Underrepresentation of Women?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Though there are an increasing number of female medical graduates, women remain underrepresented in academic medicine. There have been several reasons to explain this gender disparity, including marital status, number of children, number of hours worked, job flexibility, perceptions of women as inferior leaders, gender bias, sexual harassment, and unsupportive academic climates.

Aims

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between scholarly productivity and the representation of female gastroenterologists in academia. Specifically, scholarly productivity measured by the h-index and academic rank were explored to determine if there were gender disparities in academic productivity and rank in gastroenterology.

Methods

Gastroenterology departmental listings were obtained from the Fellowship and Residency Interactive Database of the American Medical Association. The Scopus database was used to record each physician’s h-index. Statistical analyses were conducted with Wilcoxon rank-sum test, which compared matched samples by academic rank, and ANOVA tests, which compared multiple academic ranks.

Results

Out of 1703 academic gastroenterologists, women account for 25% of academic physicians. Women have statistically lower h-indices at the level of Assistant Professor (p = 0.0012), and at the level of Chair (p = 0.01). There was no difference in h-indices between male and female at the rank of Associate Professor and Professor.

Conclusions

While these results mirror patterns appreciated in other fields of medicine, the results at the rank of Chair may suggest that despite the lower h-index compared to their male counterparts, females are perceived as having strong inherent leadership skills outside of academic productivity that are also conducive to leading a department and may be contributing to their rise to Chair. Keywords: gender gap; academic gastroenterologists; scholarly productivity; academic rank; H-index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The State of Women in Academic Medicine 2013–2014 FINAL.pdf.

  2. The Majority of U.S. Medical Students Are Women, New Data Show| AAMC. Accessed October 6, 2020. https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/press-releases/majority-us-medical-students-are-women-new-data-show.

  3. Tomei KL, Nahass MM, Husain Q, et al. A gender-based comparison of academic rank and scholarly productivity in academic neurological surgery. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Aust. 2014;21:1102–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2013.11.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rotbart HA, McMillen D, Taussig H, Daniels SR. Assessing gender equity in a large academic department of pediatrics. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2012;87:98–104. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823be028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hwang J, Byrd K, Nguyen MO, Liu M, Huang Y, Bae GH. Gender and ethnic diversity in academic PM&R faculty: national trend analysis of two decades. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1097/phm.0000000000000716.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reed DA, Enders F, Lindor R, McClees M, Lindor KD. Gender differences in academic productivity and leadership appointments of physicians throughout academic careers. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2011;86:43–47. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ff9ff2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lopez SA, Svider PF, Misra P, Bhagat N, Langer PD, Eloy JA. Gender differences in promotion and scholarly impact: an analysis of 1460 academic ophthalmologists. J Surg Educ. 2014;71:851–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.03.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eloy JA, Svider PF, Cherla DV, et al. Gender disparities in research productivity among 9952 academic physicians. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:1865–1875. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eloy JA, Svider P, Chandrasekhar SS, et al. Gender disparities in scholarly productivity within academic otolaryngology departments. Otolaryngol Neck Surg Off J Am Acad Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2013;148:215–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599812466055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gender disparity among US anaesthesiologists: are women underrepresented in academic ranks and scholarly productivity? PASHKOVA-2013—Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica—Wiley Online Library.

  11. de Guzman Strong C, Cornelius LA. Preparing the next generation in academic medicine: recruiting and retaining the best. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132:1018–1025. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2011.407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Paik AM, Mady LJ, Villanueva NL, et al. Research productivity and gender disparities: a look at academic plastic surgery. J Surg Educ. 2014;71:593–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.01.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bickel J. Women in medical education. A status report. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:1579–1584. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198812153192405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Diamond SJ, Thomas CR, Desai S, et al. Gender differences in publication productivity, academic rank, and career duration among US academic gastroenterology faculty. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2016;91:1158–1163. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Active Physicians by Sex and Specialty, 2017| AAMC. Accessed January 1, 2020. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/interactive-data/active-physicians-sex-and-specialty-2017.

  16. Woodward Z, Rodriguez Z, Jou JH, et al. Gender disparities in gastroenterology fellowship director positions in the United States. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:595–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schneider A, Kanagarajan N, Anjelly D, Reynolds JC, Ahmad A. Importance of gender, socioeconomic status, and history of abuse on patient preference for endoscopist. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:340–348. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2008.96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Drinkwater J, Tully MP, Dornan T. The effect of gender on medical students’ aspirations: a qualitative study. Med Educ. 2008;42:420–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03031.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sanfey HA, Saalwachter-Schulman AR, Nyhof-Young JM, Eidelson B, Mann BD. Influences on medical student career choice: gender or generation? Arch Surg (Chicago, Ill 1960). 2006;141:1086–1094. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.141.11.1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Achkar E. Will women ever break the glass ceiling in medicine? Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1587–1588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01988.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Carr PL, Ash AS, Friedman RH, et al. Relation of family responsibilities and gender to the productivity and career satisfaction of medical faculty. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:532–538.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Women in academic medicine. Combining career and family. ResearchGate.

  23. Gerson LB, Twomey K, Hecht G, et al. Does gender affect career satisfaction and advancement in gastroenterology? Results of an AGA institute-sponsored survey. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:1598–1606. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2007.02.045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tomer G, Xanthakos S, Kim S, et al. Perceptions of gender equality in work-life balance, salary, promotion, and harassment: results of the NASPGHAN task force survey. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;60:481–485. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000000637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Carethers JM, Quezada SM, Carr RM, Day LW. Diversity within US gastroenterology physician practices: the pipeline, cultural competencies, and gastroenterology societies approaches. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:829–833. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.056.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Heilman ME. Description and prescription: how gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. J Soc Iss. 2001;57:657–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Eagly AH, Karau SJ. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychol Rev. 2002;109:573–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Roper RL. Does gender bias still affect women in science? Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00018-19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Moss-Racusin CA, Dovidio JF, Brescoll VL, Graham MJ, Handelsman J. Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Knobloch-Westerwick S, Glynn CJ, Huge M. The Matilda effect in science communication. Sci Commun. 2013;35:603–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012472684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Trix F, Psenka C. Exploring the color of glass: letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse Soc. 2003;14:191–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926503014002277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Quadlin N. The mark of a woman’s record: gender and academic performance in hiring. Am Sociol Rev. 2018;83:331–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418762291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sexual Harassment of Women. National Academies Press; 2018. https://doi.org/10.17226/24994.

  34. Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Jones R, Perumalswami CR, Ubel P, Stewart A. Sexual harassment and discrimination experiences of academic medical faculty. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2016;315:2120–2121. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.2188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Callister R. The impact of gender and department climate on job satisfaction and intentions to quit for faculty in science and engineering fields. J Technol Transf. 2006;31(3). Accessed August 1, 2020. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/manage_facpub/6.

  36. Women and Men in STEM Often at Odds Over Workplace Equity| Pew Research Center. Accessed August 1, 2020. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2018/01/09/women-and-men-in-stem-often-at-odds-over-workplace-equity/.

  37. Guarino CM, Borden VMH. Faculty service loads and gender: Are women taking care of the academic family? Res High Educ. 2017;58:672–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9454-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Babcock L, Recalde MP, Vesterlund L, Weingart L. Gender differences in accepting and receiving requests for tasks with low promotability. Am Econ Rev. 2017;107:714–747. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20141734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Akl EA, Meerpohl JJ, Raad D, et al. Effects of assessing the productivity of faculty in academic medical centres: a systematic review. Can Med Assoc J. 2012;184:E602–E612. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.111123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pregnancy during graduate medical training.  Academic Medicine. LWW.

  41. Hamilton AR, Tyson MD, Braga JA, Lerner LB. Childbearing and pregnancy characteristics of female orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:e77. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Eskenazi L, Weston J. The pregnant plastic surgical resident: results of a survey of women plastic surgeons and plastic surgery residency directors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;95:330–335.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output.

  44. The Use of the H-Index in Academic Otolaryngology. PubMed Journals.

  45. Lee J, Kraus KL, Couldwell WT. Use of the h index in neurosurgery. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2009;111:387–392. https://doi.org/10.3171/2008.10.JNS08978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Quigley MR, Holliday EB, Fuller CD, Choi M, Thomas CR. Distribution of the h-index in radiation oncology conforms to a variation of power law: implications for assessing academic productivity. J Cancer Educ Off J Am Assoc Cancer Educ. 2012;27:463–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0363-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Benway BM, Kalidas P, Cabello JM, Bhayani SB. Does citation analysis reveal association between h-index and academic rank in urology? Urology. 2009;74:30–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Pagel PS, Hudetz JA. H-index is a sensitive indicator of academic activity in highly productive anaesthesiologists: results of a bibliometric analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;55:1085–1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02508.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing.

  50. The Gender Wage Gap by Occupation 2016; and by Race and Ethnicity. Institute for Women’s Policy Research.

  51. Oliveira DFM, Ma Y, Woodruff TK, Uzzi B. Comparison of national institutes of health grant amounts to first-time male and female principal investigators. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2019;321:898–900. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.21944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Fridner A, Norell A, Åkesson G, Gustafsson Sendén M, Tevik Løvseth L, Schenck-Gustafsson K. Possible reasons why female physicians publish fewer scientific articles than male physicians: a cross-sectional study Career choice, professional education and development. BMC Med Educ. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0347-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Waisbren SE, Bowles H, Hasan T, et al. Gender differences in research grant applications and funding outcomes for medical school faculty. J Women’s Heal. 2008;17:207–214. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2007.0412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Women’s Median Earnings as a Percent of Men’s Median Earnings, 1960–2015 (Full-time, Year-round Workers) with Projection for Pay Equity in 2059. Institute for Women’s Policy Research.

  55. Compensation and Advancement of Women in Academic Medicine: Is There Equity?| Annals of Internal Medicine| American College of Physicians.

  56. Wietsma AC. Barriers to success for female physicians in academic medicine. J Commun Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2014. https://doi.org/10.3402/jchimp.v4.24665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Elias E. Lessons learned from women in leadership positions. Work. 2018;59:175–181. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-172675.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Research: Women Score Higher Than Men in Most Leadership Skills. Accessed November 8, 2019. https://hbr.org/2019/06/research-women-score-higher-than-men-in-most-leadership-skills.

  59. Views on leadership traits and competencies|Pew Research Center. Accessed August 1, 2020. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2018/09/20/2-views-on-leadership-traits-and-competencies-and-how-they-intersect-with-gender/.

  60. Enestvedt BK, DeVivo RS, Schmitt CM, Calderwood AH. Increase in female faculty in American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy–sponsored programming over time. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:952–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.09.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Calderwood AH, Enestvedt BK, Devivo R, Schmitt CM. Impact of gender on requests for ASGE leadership assignments. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:730–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.018.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Enestvedt BK, Diamond S, Laird A, Rodriguez SA. A gender comparison of motivations for seeking leadership positions among gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kaplan SH, Sullivan LM, Dukes KA, Phillips CF, Kelch RP, Schaller JG. Sex differences in academic advancement. Results of a national study of pediatricians. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1282–1289. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199610243351706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Buckley LM, Sanders K, Shih M, Kallar S, Hampton C. Obstacles to promotion? Values of women faculty about career success and recognition: Committee on the Status of Women and Minorities, Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia Campus. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2000;75:283–288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Compensation to a department of medicine and its faculty members for the teaching of medical students and house staff.

  66. Beasley BW, Simon SD, Wright SM. A time to be promoted. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:123–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00297.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Rabinowitz LG, Anandasabapathy S, Sethi A, Siddiqui UD, Wallace MB, Kim MK. Addressing gender in gastroenterology: opportunities for change. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Current challenges facing women in gastroenterology: How do we move forward? ACG Case Rep J. 2016;3:144–145. 10.14309/crj.2016.2.

  69. Carr PL, Gunn C, Raj A, Kaplan S, Freund KM. Recruitment, promotion, and retention of women in academic medicine: how institutions are addressing gender disparities. Women’s Heal Issues Off Publ Jacobs Inst Women’s Heal. 2017;. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2016.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Bligh J, Brice J. Further insights into the roles of the medical educator: the importance of scholarly management. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2009;84:1161–1165. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ace633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Career obstacles for women in medicine: an overview—Reed—2001—Medical Education—Wiley Online Library.

  72. Svider PF, Husain Q, Mauro KM, Folbe AJ, Baredes S, Eloy JA. Impact of mentoring medical students on scholarly productivity. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014;4:138–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Richman RC, Morahan PS, Cohen DW, McDade SA. Advancing women and closing the leadership gap: the executive leadership in academic medicine (ELAM) program experience. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001;10:271–277. https://doi.org/10.1089/152460901300140022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. ACG 2019 Annual Meeting. Accessed August 1, 2020. https://www.eventscribe.com/2019/ACG/fsPopup.asp?efp=RUxTQkhWU1g2NDI1&PresentationID=592108&rnd=0.4222474&mode=presinfo.

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, 1201 E. Marshall St, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA

    Jason J. John

  2. Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

    Elizabeth S. John

  3. Rutgers University Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

    Lauren Pioppo

  4. Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA

    Arjun Gupta

  5. Valley Medical Group, Paramus, NJ, USA

    Sita Chokhavatia

  6. Advanced Gastroenterology Associates, Allied Digestive Health, West Long Branch, NJ, USA

    Amy Tilara

Authors
  1. Jason J. John
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth S. John
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lauren Pioppo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arjun Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sita Chokhavatia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Amy Tilara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason J. John.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of the submission.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

John, J.J., John, E.S., Pioppo, L. et al. Gender Disparity in Academic Gastroenterology: Beginning of the End of the Underrepresentation of Women?. Dig Dis Sci 67, 380–387 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06692-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06692-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation