Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnosing Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Comparison of Lactulose Breath Tests to Small Bowel Aspirates

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Duodenal aspiration (DA) and lactulose breath tests (LBT) are commonly performed to diagnose small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). There are no data directly comparing these tests.

Aims

To investigate the agreement between DA and LBT for the diagnosis of SIBO.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent a LBT and a DA at a tertiary care center over 9 years was assembled. LBT was considered positive if the hydrogen baseline or peak change measurement was ≥ 20 ppm, and/or if the methane baseline or peak change was ≥ 10 ppm. DA was considered positive if > 100,000 cfu/mL of gram-negative flora was identified on culture, and contaminated if > 100,000 cfu/mL of gram-positive flora was identified.

Results

A total of 106 patients were evaluated; 81 (76.4%) were female; the mean age was 53.4 ± 15.9 years. 21 patients (19.8%) had evidence of contamination on DA. 14 (16.5%) patients had a positive DA result. Patients with diabetes mellitus and those with PPI use were more likely to have a positive DA (94.4% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.007; 62% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.021, respectively). 33 (31.1%) patients had a positive LBT. Patients with a history of small bowel resection were more likely to have a positive LBT (12.1% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.016). DA and LBT results agreed in 54 patients (63.5%; kappa = − 0.02), indicating poor agreement.

Conclusions

The agreement between LBT and DA in evaluation for SIBO was poor. LBT may be favorable to DA, as LBT is safer, cheaper, and less likely to yield a contaminant result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adike A, DiBaise JK. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: nutritional implications, diagnosis, and management. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2018;47:193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobs C, Coss Adame E, Attaluri A, Valestin J, Rao SSC. Dysmotility and proton pump inhibitor use are independent risk factors for small intestinal bacterial and/or fungal overgrowth. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;37:1103–1111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rao SSC, Bhagatwala J. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: clinical features and therapeutic management. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2019;10:e00078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamilton I, Worsley BW, Cobden I, Cooke EM, Shoesmith JG, Axon AT. Simultaneous culture of saliva and jejunal aspirate in the investigation of small bowel bacterial overgrowth. Gut. 1982;23:847–853.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rezaie A, Buresi M, Lembo A, et al. Hydrogen and methane-based breath testing in gastrointestinal disorders: the North American Consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:775–784.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mattsson J, Minaya MT, Monegro M, et al. Outcome of breath tests in adult patients with suspected small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2017;10:168–172.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Erdogan A, Rao SSC, Gulley D, et al. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: duodenal aspiration vs glucose breath test. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:481–489.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Pyleris E, Barbatzas C, Pistiki A, Pimentel M. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth is associated with irritable bowel syndrome and is independent of proton pump inhibitor usage. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016;16:67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Corazza GR, Menozzi MG, Strocchi A, et al. The diagnosis of small bowel bacterial overgrowth. Reliability of jejunal culture and inadequacy of breath hydrogen testing. Gastroenterology. 1990;98:302–309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Khoshini R, Khoshini R, Dai S-C, Lezcano S, Pimentel M, et al. A systematic review of diagnostic tests for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:1443–1454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pimentel M, Saad RJ, Long MD, Rao SSC. ACG clinical guideline: small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115:165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pyleris E, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Tzivras D, Koussoulas V, Barbatzas C, Pimentel M. The prevalence of overgrowth by aerobic bacteria in the small intestine by small bowel culture: relationship with irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:1321–1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Franco DL, Disbrow MB, Kahn A, et al. Duodenal aspirates for small intestine bacterial overgrowth: yield, PPIs, and outcomes after treatment at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:971582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ratuapli SK, Ellington TG, O’Neill M-T, et al. Proton pump inhibitor therapy use does not predispose to small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:730–735.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Su T, Lai S, Lee A, He X, Chen S. Meta-analysis: proton pump inhibitors moderately increase the risk of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. J Gastroenterol. 2018;53:27–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Quigley EMM. The spectrum of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2019;21:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gabbard SL, Lacy BE, Levine GM, Crowell MD. The impact of alcohol consumption and cholecystectomy on small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59:638–644.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sung HJ, Paik C-N, Chung WC, Lee K-M, Yang J-M, Choi M-G. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth diagnosed by glucose hydrogen breath test in post-cholecystectomy patients. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;21:545–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors participated in the design, research, literature review, writing and editing of this manuscript. No assistance, financial or otherwise, was provided for the production of this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Cangemi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

DC: no disclosures; BEL: consultant for Ironwood, Urovant, Salix, Viver; JW: no disclosures.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cangemi, D.J., Lacy, B.E. & Wise, J. Diagnosing Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Comparison of Lactulose Breath Tests to Small Bowel Aspirates. Dig Dis Sci 66, 2042–2050 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06484-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06484-z

Keywords

Navigation