Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Increased Risk of Progression to Gastric Adenocarcinoma in Patients with Non-dysplastic Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Versus a Control Population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

In previous studies, the 5-year progression rate of gastric intestinal metaplasia to gastric adenocarcinoma has varied substantially. We investigated the incidence rate of dysplasia and gastric adenocarcinoma and the rate of progression among a cohort of patients with non-dysplastic gastric intestinal metaplasia.

Methods

This is a single-center, single-cohort retrospective study. Patients who had undergone an EGD with biopsies from 01/01/1993 to 12/31/2013 were included. The primary outcome of interest was the composite of low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, or adenocarcinoma. Time to progression and risk factor subgroup analyses were performed.

Results

A total of 1628 subjects were screened, of whom 358 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 21 first-time events were recorded. The annual incidence rate of low-grade dysplasia was 2.1 (95% CI 1.3–3.5) cases per 1000 person-years, 0.5 (95% 0.2–1.3) per 1000 person-years for high-grade dysplasia, and 0.8 (95% CI 0.3–1.6) cases per 1000 person-years for gastric adenocarcinoma. The historical control group had an annual adenocarcinoma incidence rate of 0.07 per 1000 person-years. The event rate in Asians was also noted to be significantly higher between years 0–8 as compared with patients of non-Asian race, and extensive intestinal metaplasia was an independent risk factor (HR = 4.06 (95% CI 1.45–11.34), p = 0.007).

Conclusions

Patients with non-dysplastic gastric intestinal metaplasia may progress to dysplasia and gastric adenocarcinoma. The incidence rate of gastric adenocarcinoma is higher than that of the historical control population (0.07 per 1000 person-years). The presence of extensive intestinal metaplasia was a risk factor for progression of disease. Triennial EGD may be warranted in patients with non-dysplastic gastric intestinal metaplasia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Shin H-R, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–2917.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertuccio P, Chatenoud L, Levi F, et al. Recent patterns in gastric cancer: a global overview. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:666–673.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lui FH, Tuan B, Swenson SL, Wong RJ. Ethnic disparities in gastric cancer incidence and Survival in the USA: an updated analysis of 1992–2009 SEER data. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59:3027–3034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Correa P. a model for gastric cancer epidemiology. Lancet. 1975;306:58–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Busuttil RA, Boussioutas A. Intestinal metaplasia: a premalignant lesion involved in gastric carcinogenesis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:193–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Correa P, Piazuelo MB, Wilson KT. Pathology of gastric intestinal metaplasia: clinical implications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:493–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Vries AC, van Grieken NCT, Looman CWN, et al. Gastric cancer risk in patients with premalignant gastric lesions: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:945–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rokkas T, Filipe MI, Sladen GE. Detection of an increased incidence of early gastric cancer in patients with intestinal metaplasia type III who are closely followed up. Gut. 1991;32:1110–1113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shichijo S, Hirata Y, Niikura R, et al. Histologic intestinal metaplasia and endoscopic atrophy are predictors of gastric cancer development after Helicobacter pylori eradication. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:618–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi AY, Strate LL, Fix MC, Schmidt RA, Ende AR, Yeh MM, et al. Association of gastric intestinal metaplasia and East Asian ethnicity with the risk of gastric adenocarcinoma in a U.S. population. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017.

  12. Hamashima C, Shibuya D, Yamazaki H, et al. The Japanese guidelines for gastric cancer screening. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008;38:259–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dinis-Ribeiro M, Areia M, de Vries A, et al. Management of precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS): guideline from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter Study Group (EHSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and the Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED). Endoscopy. 2011;44:74–94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim GH, Liang PS, Bang SJ, Hwang JH. Screening and surveillance for gastric cancer in the United States: is it needed? Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li D, Bautista MC, Jiang S-F, et al. Risks and predictors of gastric adenocarcinoma in patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:1104–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reddy KM, Chang JI, Shi JM, Wu BU. Risk of gastric cancer among patients with intestinal metaplasia of the stomach in a US integrated health care system. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:1420–1425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. You WC, Li JY, Blot WJ, et al. Evolution of precancerous lesions in a rural Chinese population at high risk of gastric cancer. Int J Cancer. 1999;83:615–619.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Filipe MI, Munoz N, Matko I, et al. Intestinal metaplasia types and the risk of gastric cancer: a cohort study in Slovenia. Int J Cancer. 1994;57:324–329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Saumoy M, Schneider Y, Shen N, Kahaleh M, Sharaiha RZ, Shah SC. Cost effectiveness of gastric cancer screening according to race and ethnicity. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:648–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cassaro M, Rugge M, Gutierrez O, Leandro G, Graham DY, Genta RM. Topographic patterns of intestinal metaplasia and gastric cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:1431–1438.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Statistical analysis supported by unrestricted Grant from Allergan Pharmaceuticals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RD and NSN were involved in conception and design, acquisition of data, drafting of the manuscript, and critical revision of the article for important intellectual content. YD performed statistical analysis and drafting of the manuscript. MG contributed to conception and design. AC and PFH performed acquisition of data. MJS obtained funding and helped in conception and design, administrative support, and study supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikola S. Natov.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this article.

Ethical approval

This study was reviewed and approved by the Tufts Health Sciences Campus Institutional Review Board.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dhingra, R., Natov, N.S., Daaboul, Y. et al. Increased Risk of Progression to Gastric Adenocarcinoma in Patients with Non-dysplastic Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Versus a Control Population. Dig Dis Sci 65, 3316–3323 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-06031-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-06031-5

Keywords

Navigation