Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection with Systemic Antimicrobial Therapy Following Successful Fecal Microbiota Transplant: Should We Recommend Anti-Clostridium difficile Antibiotic Prophylaxis?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The risk of a new Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) after FMT is unknown if non-CDI antibiotics are required. It is uncertain if anti-CDI prophylaxis or probiotics would reduce risk. We therefore aimed to compare the risk of CDI with and without antibiotic exposure and the benefit of concomitant anti-CDI antibiotic or probiotic prophylaxis.

Methods

This is a multicenter retrospective study carried out at three large FMT referral centers of patients who underwent FMT for recurrent CDI. Patients were assessed for antibiotic use, as well as concomitant use of prophylactic anti-CDI antibiotics or probiotics. Time to CDI recurrence after FMT was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

A total of 404 patients were included: 63% were females, with a mean age of 61.3 ± 18.8 years. Mean length of post-FMT follow-up was 18.1 ± 11.9 months (range 2.2–45.2). Among the entire cohort 8.1% (n = 33) experienced a CDI recurrence. Overall, 111 patients (27.4%) used a non-CDI antibiotic, of which 16.2% (n = 18) experienced a CDI recurrence. Patients who used non-CDI antibiotics were more likely to develop CDI (HR 8.44, 95% CI 4.21–16.93, p < 0.001). The risk of CDI recurrence was not different between patients who received anti-CDI antibiotic prophylaxis to those who did not (HR = 1.88, 95% CI 0.72–4.86, p = 0.2); however, probiotic prophylaxis was associated with a greater risk of CDI recurrence (HR = 2.65, 95% CI 1.02–6.86, p = 0.045).

Conclusion

Non-CDI antibiotic use was not uncommon after successful FMT and significantly increased the risk of a new episode of CDI. In this study, we found that the prophylactic use of anti-CDI antibiotics or probiotics was not protective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cammarota G, Ianiro G, Tilg H, et al. European consensus conference on faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice. Gut. 2017;66:569–580.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kassam Z, Lee CH, Yuan Y, Hunt RH. Fecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:500–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carignan A, Poulin S, Martin P, et al. Efficacy of secondary prophylaxis with vancomycin for preventing recurrent Clostridium difficile infections. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:1834–1840.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilcox M, Dorr MB, Pedley A. Bezlotoxumab and recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1594–1596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Allegretti JR, Kao D, Sitko J, Fischer M, Kassam Z. Early antibiotic use after fecal microbiota transplantation increases risk of treatment failure. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:134–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shen NT, Maw A, Tmanova LL, et al. Timely use of probiotics in hospitalized adults prevents Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review with meta-regression analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:1889–1900 e1889.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown CC, Manis MM, Bohm NM, Curry SR. Oral vancomycin for secondary prophylaxis of Clostridium difficile infection. Ann Pharmacother. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1060028018815170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McDonald LC, Gerding DN, Johnson S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults and children: 2017 update by the infectious diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:987–994.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Crobach MJ, Planche T, Eckert C, et al. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the diagnostic guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:S63–S81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JRA, DK, and MF initiated the study concept and design; participated in acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and critically revised the manuscript. JRA drafted the manuscript. VCG, EP, JS, and BR participated in acquisition and interpretation of the data. HX performed data analysis, interpretation of data, and critical revision of the manuscript. ZK contributed to the interpretation of data and critical revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica R. Allegretti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

ZK is employed by and has equity in Finch Therapeutics Group. JRA and MF consult for Finch Therapeutics. No other conflicts of interest to report for any authors relevant to the work presented in this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allegretti, J.R., Kao, D., Phelps, E. et al. Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection with Systemic Antimicrobial Therapy Following Successful Fecal Microbiota Transplant: Should We Recommend Anti-Clostridium difficile Antibiotic Prophylaxis?. Dig Dis Sci 64, 1668–1671 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5450-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5450-4

Keywords

Navigation