Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnosis of Celiac Disease: Taking a Bite Out of the Controversy

  • CURRENT CLINICAL CONTROVERSIES
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Celiac disease is a common autoimmune disorder of the small intestine, triggered by an immunological response to the gluten present in wheat, barley, and rye in individuals who are genetically at risk. A key to reducing the complications of this disease is early diagnosis, preferably in childhood, and consuming a lifelong gluten-free diet once diagnosis is confirmed. Yet, the diagnosis of celiac disease is often considerably delayed, exposing patients to needless suffering and morbidity. It is also difficult to confirm histologically if dietary gluten has been restricted prior to obtaining a diagnostic biopsy, a significant problem given the current growing popularity of gluten-free diets. Furthermore, failure to understand or follow current guidelines means physicians may recommend patients commence the gluten-free diet before initiating referral to a gastroenterologist. Finally, adding further confusion, pediatric guidelines in Europe support a diagnosis based on serology rather than on histology, whereas those based in North America do not. The purpose of this review is to discuss these issues and other controversies in the diagnosis of celiac disease and to consider ways to optimize diagnosis across the lifespan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kang JY, Kang AH, Green A, et al. Systematic review: worldwide variation in the frequency of coeliac disease and changes over time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;38:226–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.12373.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fasano A, Berti I, Gerarduzzi T, et al. Prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk and not-at-risk groups in the United States: a large multicenter study. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:286–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rubio-Tapia A, Ludvigsson JF, Brantner TL, et al. The prevalence of celiac disease in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1538–1544. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2012.219. (quiz 37, 45).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Husby S, Koletzko S, Korponay-Szabo IR, et al. European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54:136–160. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e31821a23d0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hill ID, Dirks MH, Liptak GS, et al. Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of celiac disease in children: recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;40:1–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hill ID, Fasano A, Guandalini S, et al. NASPGHAN clinical report on the diagnosis and treatment of gluten-related disorders. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016;63:156–165. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000001216.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ludvigsson JF, Bai JC, Biagi F, et al. Diagnosis and management of adult coeliac disease: guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology. Gut. 2014;63:1210–1228. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306578.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Murch S, Jenkins H, Auth M, et al. Joint BSPGHAN and Coeliac UK guidelines for the diagnosis and management of coeliac disease in children. Arch Dis Child. 2013;98:806–811. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-303996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Kelly CP, et al. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:656–676. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2013.79. (quiz 77).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hill P, Austin A, Forsyth J, Holmes G. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of coeliac disease. Gut. 2015;64:691–692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Giersiepen K, Lelgemann M, Stuhldreher N, et al. Accuracy of diagnostic antibody tests for coeliac disease in children: summary of an evidence report. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54:229–241. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e318216f2e5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ribes-Koninckx C, Mearin ML, Korponay-Szabo IR, et al. Coeliac disease diagnosis: ESPGHAN 1990 criteria or need for a change? Results of a questionnaire. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54:15–19. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e31822a00bb.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Beltran L, Koenig M, Egner W, et al. High-titre circulating tissue transglutaminase-2 antibodies predict small bowel villous atrophy, but decision cut-off limits must be locally validated. Clin Exp Immunol. 2014;176:190–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.12249.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Saginur M, AlRefaee AM, Spady DW, et al. Antitissue transglutaminase antibody determination versus upper endoscopic biopsy diagnosis of paediatric celiac disease. Paediatrics Child Health. 2013;18:246–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rajani S, Huynh HQ, Shirton L, et al. A Canadian study toward changing local practice in the diagnosis of pediatric celiac disease. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:6234160. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6234160.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Fernandez-Banares F, Alsina M, Modolell I, et al. Are positive serum-IgA-tissue-transglutaminase antibodies enough to diagnose coeliac disease without a small bowel biopsy? Post-test probability of coeliac disease. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2012;6:861–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crohns.2012.01.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wolf J, Hasenclever D, Petroff D, et al. Antibodies in the diagnosis of coeliac disease: a biopsy-controlled, international, multicentre study of 376 children with coeliac disease and 695 controls. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e97853. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097853.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schirru E, Jores RD, Congia M. Prudence is necessary in the application of the new ESPGHAN criteria for celiac disease omitting duodenal biopsy: a case report. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;26:679–680. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000000096.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Elitsur Y, Sigman T, Watkins R, et al. Tissue transglutaminase levels are not sufficient to diagnose celiac disease in north american practices without intestinal biopsies. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62:175–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4354-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. De Leo L, Quaglia S, Ziberna F, et al. Serum anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies detected during febrile illness may not be produced by the intestinal mucosa. J Pediatr. 2015;166:761–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.12.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wolf J, Petroff D, Richter T, et al. Validation of antibody-based strategies for diagnosis of pediatric celiac disease without biopsy. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:410–419. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.023. (e17).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Trovato CM, Montuori M, Anania C, et al. Are ESPGHAN “biopsy-sparing” guidelines for celiac disease also suitable for asymptomatic patients? Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:1485–1489. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2015.285.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Smarrazzo A, Misak Z, Costa S, et al. Diagnosis of celiac disease and applicability of ESPGHAN guidelines in Mediterranean countries: a real life prospective study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2017;17:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0577-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Paul SP, Harries SL, Basude D. Barriers to implementing the revised ESPGHAN guidelines for coeliac disease in children: a cross-sectional survey of coeliac screen reporting in laboratories in England. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102:942–946. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-312027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Benelli E, Carrato V, Martelossi S, et al. Coeliac disease in the ERA of the new ESPGHAN and BSPGHAN guidelines: a prospective cohort study. Arch Dis Child. 2016;101:172–176. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-309259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Efthymakis K, Serio M, Milano A, et al. Application of the biopsy-sparing ESPGHAN guidelines for celiac disease diagnosis in adults: a real-life study. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62:2433–2439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-017-4672-1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Di Tola M, Marino M, Goetze S, et al. Identification of a serum transglutaminase threshold value for the noninvasive diagnosis of symptomatic adult celiac disease patients: a retrospective study. J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:1031–1039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-016-1188-y.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zanini B, Magni A, Caselani F, et al. High tissue-transglutaminase antibody level predicts small intestinal villous atrophy in adult patients at high risk of celiac disease. Dig Liver Dis. 2012;44:280–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2011.10.013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Casella S, Zanini B, Lanzarotto F, et al. Celiac disease in elderly adults: clinical, serological, and histological characteristics and the effect of a gluten-free diet. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:1064–1069. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03997.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rubio-Tapia A, Rahim MW, See JA, et al. Mucosal recovery and mortality in adults with celiac disease after treatment with a gluten-free diet. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1412–1420. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2010.10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lebwohl B, Granath F, Ekbom A, et al. Mucosal healing and mortality in coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;37:332–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.12164.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lebwohl B, Murray JA, Rubio-Tapia A, et al. Predictors of persistent villous atrophy in coeliac disease: a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39:488–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.12621.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Silvester JA, Kurada S, Szwajcer A, et al. Tests for serum transglutaminase and endomysial antibodies do not detect most patients with celiac disease and persistent villous atrophy on gluten-free diets: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:689–701. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.015. (e1).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Leonard MM, Weir DC, DeGroote M, et al. Value of IgA tTG in predicting mucosal recovery in children with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;64:286–291. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000001460.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ghazzawi Y, Rubio-Tapia A, Murray JA, et al. Mucosal healing in children with treated celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;59:229–231. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000000390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Haere P, Hoie O, Schulz T, et al. Long-term mucosal recovery and healing in celiac disease is the rule—not the exception. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:1439–1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2016.1218540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Beg S, Ragunath K, Wyman A, et al. Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS). Gut. 2017;66:1886–1899. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Weir DC, Glickman JN, Roiff T, et al. Variability of histopathological changes in childhood celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:207–212. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2009.557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ravelli A, Villanacci V, Monfredini C, et al. How patchy is patchy villous atrophy?: distribution pattern of histological lesions in the duodenum of children with celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2103–2110. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2010.153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ofei S, Boyle B, Ediger T, et al. Adherence to endoscopy biopsy guidelines for celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;61:440–444. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000000834.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lebwohl B, Kapel RC, Neugut AI, et al. Adherence to biopsy guidelines increases celiac disease diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Rostami-Nejad M, Villanacci V, Hogg-Kollars S, et al. Endoscopic and histological pitfalls in the diagnosis of celiac disease: a multicentre study assessing the current practice. Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas: organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestiva. 2013;105:326–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Latorre M, Lagana SM, Freedberg DE, et al. Endoscopic biopsy technique in the diagnosis of celiac disease: one bite or two? Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:1228–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.10.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Taavela J, Popp A, Kurppa K, et al. Is there a role for duodenal bulb biopsies in celiac disease diagnostics? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:1510–1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2016.04.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Stoven SA, Choung RS, Rubio-Tapia A, et al. Analysis of biopsies from duodenal bulbs of all endoscopy patients increases detection of abnormalities but has a minimal effect on diagnosis of celiac disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:1582–1588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2016.02.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Taavela J, Popp A, Korponay-Szabo IR, et al. A prospective study on the usefulness of duodenal bulb biopsies in celiac disease diagnosis in children: urging caution. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:124–133. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2015.387.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Caruso R, Marafini I, Del Vecchio Blanco G, et al. Sampling of proximal and distal duodenal biopsies in the diagnosis and monitoring of celiac disease. Dig Liver Dis. 2014;46:323–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2013.12.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Memeo L, Jhang J, Hibshoosh H, et al. Duodenal intraepithelial lymphocytosis with normal villous architecture: common occurrence in H. pylori gastritis. Mod Pathol. 2005;18:134–144. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3800404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Marsh MN. Coeliac disease, mucosal change and IEL: doing what counts the best. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2016;9:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Lahdeaho ML, Kaukinen K, Collin P, et al. Celiac disease: from inflammation to atrophy: a long-term follow-up study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;41:44–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Auricchio R, Tosco A, Piccolo E, et al. Potential celiac children: 9-year follow-up on a gluten-containing diet. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:913–921. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2014.77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Oberhuber G, Granditsch G, Vogelsang H. The histopathology of coeliac disease: time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;11:1185–1194.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Rostami K, Marsh MN, Johnson MW, et al. ROC-king onwards: intraepithelial lymphocyte counts, distribution & role in coeliac disease mucosal interpretation. Gut. 2017;66:2080–2086. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314297.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Tortora R, Capone P, Imperatore N, et al. Predictive value of “Marsh 1” type histology in subjects with suspected cealic disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:801–806. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365521.2014.919019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Monten C, Bjelkenkrantz K, Gudjonsdottir AH, et al. Validity of histology for the diagnosis of paediatric coeliac disease: a Swedish multicentre study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:427–433. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365521.2015.1101486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kaur Bilkhoo H, Ducruet T, Marchand V, et al. Revisiting pathological criteria for earlier diagnosis of coeliac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016;62:734–738. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000001026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Eigner W, Wrba F, Chott A, et al. Early recognition of possible pitfalls in histological diagnosis of celiac disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015;50:1088–1093. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365521.2015.1017835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Arguelles-Grande C, Tennyson CA, Lewis SK, et al. Variability in small bowel histopathology reporting between different pathology practice settings: impact on the diagnosis of coeliac disease. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65:242–247. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Market Analysis: food intolerance products in the United States: lactose-free, gluten-free and diabetic food. October 2013. http://www.agr.gc.ca/resources/prod/internet-internet/MISB-DGSIM/ATS-SEA/PDF/6429-eng.pdf.

  60. Moore LR. “But we’re not hypochondriacs”: the changing shape of gluten-free dieting and the contested illness experience. Soc Sci Med. 2014;105:76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Silvester JA, Weiten D, Graff LA, et al. Is it gluten-free? Relationship between self-reported gluten-free diet adherence and knowledge of gluten content of foods. Nutrition. 2016;32:777–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2016.01.021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Laurin P, Wolving M, Falth-Magnusson K. Even small amounts of gluten cause relapse in children with celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002;34:26–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Bruins MJ. The clinical response to gluten challenge: a review of the literature. Nutrients. 2013;5:4614–4641. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu5114614.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Sarna VK, Lundin KEA, Morkrid L, et al. HLA-DQ-Gluten tetramer blood test accurately identifies patients with and without celiac disease in absence of gluten consumption. Gastroenterology. 2017;. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.11.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Choung RS, Larson SA, Khaleghi S, et al. Prevalence and morbidity of undiagnosed celiac disease from a community-based study. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:830–839. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.043. (e5).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Corrao G, Corazza GR, Bagnardi V, et al. Mortality in patients with coeliac disease and their relatives: a cohort study. Lancet. 2001;358:356–361.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Paez MA, Gramelspacher AM, Sinacore J, et al. Delay in diagnosis of celiac disease in patients without gastrointestinal complaints. Am J Med. 2017;130:1318–1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.05.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Vavricka SR, Vadasz N, Stotz M, et al. Celiac disease diagnosis still significantly delayed—doctor’s but not patients’ delay responsive for the increased total delay in women. Dig Liver Dis. 2016;48:1148–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2016.06.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Pham BN, Musset L, Chyderiotis G, et al. Celiac disease diagnosis: impact of guidelines on medical prescription in France. J Dig Dis. 2014;15:435–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-2980.12158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justine M. Turner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turner, J.M. Diagnosis of Celiac Disease: Taking a Bite Out of the Controversy. Dig Dis Sci 63, 1384–1391 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5050-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5050-3

Keywords

Navigation