Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk of Neoplastic Progression Among Patients with an Irregular Z Line on Long-Term Follow-Up

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is a known complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease. In a previous study, we described a high prevalence of intestinal metaplasia (IM) in patients with an irregular Z line. However, the clinical importance of this finding is unclear.

Goals

To evaluate the long-term development of BE and relevant complications in patients diagnosed with an irregular Z line, with or without IM, on routine esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD).

Methods

In our previously described cohort, 166 out of 2000 consecutive patients were diagnosed with an incidental irregular Z line. Of those with irregular Z line, 43% had IM. In this continuation study, patients’ status was reassessed after a median follow-up of 70 months. Patients were divided into two groups: Patients with IM (IM-positive group) and without IM (IM-negative group). The incidence of long-term development of BE, dysplasia, and esophageal adenocarcinoma were compared between groups.

Results

At least one follow-up EGD was performed in 102 (61%) patients with an irregular Z line. Endoscopic evidence of BE was found in eight IM-positive patients (8/50 [16%]) and in one IM-negative patient (1/52 [1.9%]). Two (4%) IM-positive patients developed BE with low-grade dysplasia. None of the patients developed high-grade dysplasia, or esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Conclusions

Patients with irregular Z line do not develop major BE complication in more than 5 years of follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maes S, Sharma P, Bisschops R. Review: surveillance of patients with Barrett oesophagus. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;30:901–912.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG, Gerson LB. ACG, clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:30–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. di Pietro M, Chan D, Fitzgerald RC, Wang KK. Screening for Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:912–923.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitzgerald RC, di Pietro M, Ragunath K, et al. British society of gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut. 2014;63:7–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anaparthy R, Gaddam S, Kanakadandi V, et al. Association between length of Barrett’s esophagus and risk of high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma in patients without dysplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:1430–1436.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Desai TK, Krishnan K, Samala N, et al. The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in non-dysplastic Barrett’s oesophagus: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2012;61:970–976.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rastogi A, Puli S, El-Serag HB, Bansal A, Wani S, Sharma P. Incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett’s esophagus and high-grade dysplasia: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:394–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh S, Manickam P, Amin AV. Incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus with low-grade dysplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:897–909.e4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weusten B, Bisschops R, Coron E, et al. Endoscopic management of Barrett’s esophagus: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) position statement. Endoscopy. 2017;49:191–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jung KW, Talley NJ, Romero Y, et al. Epidemiology and natural history of intestinal metaplasia of the gastroesophageal junction and Barrett’s esophagus: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1447–1455.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. American Gastroenterological Association, Spechler SJ, Sharma P, Souza RF, Inadomi JM, Shaheen NJ. American gastroenterological association medical position statement on the management of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1084–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pohl H, Pech O, Arash H, et al. Length of Barrett’s oesophagus and cancer risk: implications from a large sample of patients with early oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Gut. 2016;65:196–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dickman R, Levi Z, Vilkin A, Zvidi I, Niv Y. Predictors of specialized intestinal metaplasia in patients with an incidental irregular Z line. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;22:135–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thota PN, Vennalaganti P, Vennelaganti S, et al. Low risk of high-grade dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma among patients with Barrett’s esophagus less than 1 cm (Irregular Z Line) within 5 years of index endoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:987–992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Spechler SJ, Zeroogian JM, Antonioli DA, Wang HH, Goyal RK. Prevalence of metaplasia at the gastro-oesophageal junction. Lancet. 1994;344:1533–1536.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pera M. Trends in incidence and prevalence of specialized intestinal metaplasia, Barrett’s esophagus, and adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction. World J Surg. 2003;27:999–1006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Byrne JP, Bhatnagar S, Hamid B, Armstrong GR, Attwood SEA. Comparative study of intestinal metaplasia and mucin staining at the cardia and esophagogastric junction in 225 symptomatic patients presenting for diagnostic open-access gastroscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:98–103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Weston AP, Krmpotich PT, Cherian R, Dixon A, Topalovski M. Prospective evaluation of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia within the cardia of patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42:597–602. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018811512939.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Itskoviz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Itskoviz, D., Levi, Z., Boltin, D. et al. Risk of Neoplastic Progression Among Patients with an Irregular Z Line on Long-Term Follow-Up. Dig Dis Sci 63, 1513–1517 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-4910-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-4910-1

Keywords

Navigation