Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 62, Issue 5, pp 1313–1320 | Cite as

Long-Term Outcome After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer in Non-neoplastic Pathology Results

  • Yong Hwan Kwon
  • Seong Woo JeonEmail author
  • Su Youn Nam
  • Hyun Seok Lee
  • Jeong Shik Kim
  • Ji Young Park
Original Article



After endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC), negative pathological findings cause concern about the adequacy of the procedure and local recurrence after ESD.


To investigate the incidence of local recurrence in cases with negative pathological findings after ESD for EGC and pathologically complete resection (CR) during long-term follow-up.


We reviewed 453 patients who underwent ESD for ECG from January 2007 to December 2010, respectively. Of these patients, in 17 cases the pathology results confirmed no residual tumor (NRT), and in 421 cases they showed CR in the ESD specimen. Finally, 17 NRT and 358 CR cases were followed up during surveillance. Patient characteristics, endoscopic and pathological data were analyzed for risk factors of local recurrence. We also re-evaluated the pathology of the NRT group to identify hidden malignant cells in the previous ESD specimens.


There was no difference between the two groups in terms of recurrence during follow-up surveillance (median 55.7 months). Late local recurrence of EGC was found in two cases (11.8%) in the NRT group, and three early local recurrences (5.6%) were found in the CR group. A review of the pathology in the NRT group revealed hidden malignant cells in five patients (29.4%).


Even when the pathological report indicates NRT after ESD, it might be necessary to re-evaluate ESD specimens with a width <2 mm, and long-term endoscopic surveillance should be routinely used for detecting local EGC recurrence after ESD.


Endoscopic submucosal dissection Early gastric cancer No residual tumor Local recurrence 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Drs, Yong Hwan Kwon, Seong Woo Jeon, Hyun Seok Lee, Su Youn Nam, Jeong Shik Kim and Ji Young Park have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Ethical standards

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration. Informed consent or a substitute for it was obtained from all patients for being included in this study.


  1. 1.
    Soetikno R, Kaltenbach T, Yeh R et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for early cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4490–4498.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kwon MJ, Park JJ, Yun JW et al. Clinicopathologic features of cases with negative pathologic results after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2012;59:211–217.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Takao M, Kakushima N, Takizawa K et al. Discrepancies in histologic diagnoses of early gastric cancer between biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimens. Gastric Cancer. 2012; 15:91–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee CK, Chung IK, Lee SH et al. Is endoscopic forceps biopsy enough for a definitive diagnosis of gastric epithelial neoplasia? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:1507–1513.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sung HY, Cheung DY, Cho SH et al. Polyps in the gastrointestinal tract: discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsies and resected specimens. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;21:190–195.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim YJ, Park JC, Kim JH et al. Histologic diagnosis based on forceps biopsy is not adequate for determining endoscopic treatment of gastric adenomatous lesions. Endoscopy. 2010;42:620–626.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang MJ, Shin SJ, Lee KS et al. Non-neoplastic pathology results after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial dysplasia or early gastric cancer. Endoscopy. 2015;47:598–604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim ES, Jeon SW, Park SY et al. Where has the tumor gone? The characteristics of cases of negative pathologic diagnosis after endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy. 2009;41:739–745.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Japanese Gastric Cancer A. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English ed. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:101–112.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kojima T, Parra-Blanco A, Takahashi H et al. Outcome of endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: review of the Japanese literature. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48:550–555.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dixon MF. Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited. Gut. 2002;51:130–131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kwon YH, Heo J, Lee HS et al. Failure of Helicobacter pylori eradication and age are independent risk factors for recurrent neoplasia after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer in 283 patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39:609–618.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park YM, Cho E, Kang HY et al. The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2666–2677.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abe S, Oda I, Suzuki H et al. Long-term surveillance and treatment outcomes of metachronous gastric cancer occurring after curative endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy. 2015;47:1113–1118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chun HJ, Keum B, Kim JH et al. Current status of endoscopic submucosal dissection for the management of early gastric cancer: A Korean perspective. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:2592.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim YY, Jeon SW, Kim J et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer with undifferentiated histology: could we extend the criteria beyond? Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4656–4662.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gotoda T. Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2007;10:1–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chung IIK, Lee JH, Lee SH et al. Therapeutic outcomes in 1000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: Korean ESD Study Group multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1228.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Muehldorfer S, Stolte M, Martus P et al. Diagnostic accuracy of forceps biopsy versus polypectomy for gastric polyps: a prospective multicentre study. Gut. 2002;50:465–470.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jung MK, Jeon SW, Park SY et al. Endoscopic characteristics of gastric adenomas suggesting carcinomatous transformation. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2705–2711.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hull MJ, Mino-Kenudson M, Nishioka NS et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection: an improved diagnostic procedure for early gastroesophageal epithelial neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30:114–118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oda I, Oyama T, Abe S et al. Preliminary results of multicenter questionnaire study on long-term outcomes of curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Dig Endosc. 2014;26:214–219.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shimamura Y, Ishii N, Nakano K et al. Repeat endoscopic submucosal dissection for recurrent gastric cancers after endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;5:600–604.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Takenaka R, Kawahara Y, Okada H et al. Risk factors associated with local recurrence of early gastric cancers after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:887–894.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gastric Cancer CenterKyungpook National University Medical CenterDaeguSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of PathologyKyungpook National University Medical CenterDaeguSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations