Abstract
Background
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and need for liver transplantation (LT). It is unclear if HCV-related LT outcomes vary by race/ethnicity.
Aims
We aim to evaluate ethnic disparities specifically among patients with chronic HCV in the USA.
Methods
Using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing 2003–2013 LT registry, we evaluated race/ethnicity-specific disparities in LT waitlist survival and probability of receiving LT among chronic HCV patients listed for LT.
Results
Among 43,478 HCV patients listed for LT (70.0% non-Hispanic white, 10.8% black, 16.3% Hispanic, 2.9% Asian), HCV-related LT waitlist registrations increased by 21.5% from 2003 to 2013. During this period, the proportion of HCV patients with HCC increased by 237%, and in 2013, HCV patients with HCC accounted for 33.0% of HCV-related waitlist registrations. When stratified by race/ethnicity, Hispanics with HCV had significantly lower waitlist mortality (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.74–0.94; p < 0.01) compared to non-Hispanic whites, but no significant differences were seen among blacks and Asians. Furthermore, compared to non-Hispanic whites, Hispanics were significantly less likely to receive LT (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.53–0.62; p < 0.001), but no differences were seen among blacks or Asians.
Conclusion
Among patients with chronic HCV in the USA, the MELD score has reduced race/ethnicity-specific disparities in waitlist mortality. However, Hispanic HCV patients had significantly better waitlist survival and lower probability of receiving LT, possibly reflecting slower disease progression compared to non-Hispanic whites with chronic HCV.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Murray KF, Carithers RL Jr. AASLD practice guidelines: evaluation of the patient for liver transplantation. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.). 2005;41:1407–1432.
Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS. Final rule Federal register. 1999;64:56650–56661.
Reid AE, Resnick M, Chang Y, Buerstatte N, Weissman JS. Disparity in use of orthotopic liver transplantation among blacks and whites. Liver Transplant. 2004;10:834–841.
Trotter JF, Osgood MJ. MELD scores of liver transplant recipients according to size of waiting list: impact of organ allocation and patient outcomes. Jama. 2004;291:1871–1874.
Moylan CA, Brady CW, Johnson JL, Smith AD, Tuttle-Newhall JE, Muir AJ. Disparities in liver transplantation before and after introduction of the MELD score. Jama. 2008;300:2371–2378.
Wong RJ, Devaki P, Nguyen L, Cheung R, Nguyen MH. Ethnic disparities and liver transplantation rates in hepatocellular carcinoma patients in the recent era: results from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry. Liver Transplant. 2014;20:528–535.
Wong RJ, Ahmed A. Combination of racial/ethnic and etiology/disease-specific factors is associated with lower survival following liver transplantation in African Americans: an analysis from UNOS/OPTN database. Clin Transplant. 2014;28:755–761.
Wong RJ, Cheung R, Ahmed A. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the most rapidly growing indication for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the U.S. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.). 2014;59:2188–2195.
Wong RJ, Aguilar M, Cheung R, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the second leading etiology of liver disease among adults awaiting liver transplantation in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:547–555.
Verna EC, Brown RS Jr. Hepatitis C virus and liver transplantation. Clin Liver Dis. 2006;10:919–940.
El-Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1118–1127.
Di Bisceglie AM. Hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.). 1997;26:34S–38S.
Yan M, Ha J, Aguilar M, et al. Birth cohort-specific disparities in hepatocellular carcinoma stage at diagnosis, treatment, and long-term survival. J Hepatol. 2016;64:326–332.
Chhatwal J, Wang X, Ayer T, et al. Hepatitis C disease burden in the United States in the era of oral direct-acting antivirals. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.). 2016;64:1442–1450.
Kabiri M, Jazwinski AB, Roberts MS, Schaefer AJ, Chhatwal J. The changing burden of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States: model-based predictions. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:170–180.
Ha J, Yan M, Aguilar M, et al. Race/ethnicity-specific disparities in hepatocellular carcinoma stage at diagnosis and its impact on receipt of curative therapies. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;50:423–430.
Alavi M, Law MG, Grebely J, et al. Time to decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma after an HBV or HCV notification: a population-based study. J Hepatol. 2016;65:879–887.
Thein HH, Walter SR, Gidding HF, et al. Trends in incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma after diagnosis of hepatitis B or C infection: a population-based cohort study, 1992–2007. J Viral Hepatitis. 2011;18:e232–e241.
Heimbach JK, Hirose R, Stock PG, et al. Delayed hepatocellular carcinoma model for end-stage liver disease exception score improves disparity in access to liver transplant in the United States. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.). 2015;61:1643–1650.
O’Leary JG, Landaverde C, Jennings L, Goldstein RM, Davis GL. Patients with NASH and cryptogenic cirrhosis are less likely than those with hepatitis C to receive liver transplants. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:700–704 e701.
Wong RJ, Chou C, Bonham CA, Concepcion W, Esquivel CO, Ahmed A. Improved survival outcomes in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and alcoholic liver disease following liver transplantation: an analysis of 2002–2012 United Network for Organ Sharing data. Clin Transplant. 2014;28:713–721.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Robert Wong—Advisory board and research Grant from Gilead. Joseph Ahn, Benny Liu, and Taft Bhuket have no disclosures.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahn, J., Liu, B., Bhuket, T. et al. Race/Ethnicity-Specific Outcomes Among Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Patients Listed for Liver Transplantation. Dig Dis Sci 62, 1051–1057 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-017-4469-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-017-4469-2