Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Royal Free Hospital-Nutritional Prioritizing Tool Is an Independent Predictor of Deterioration of Liver Function and Survival in Cirrhosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Aims

Malnutrition might affect survival and severity of complications in cirrhotic patients. However, adequate evaluation of the nutritional status is a difficult task since the common assessment tools are either inappropriate or too complicated. A simpler method could evaluate the patient’s risk for malnutrition instead of the nutritional status itself. This study evaluated the prediction of clinical deterioration and transplant-free survival in patients with chronic liver disease by two nutritional risk scores.

Methods

In 84 cirrhotic patients, Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS), Royal Free Hospital-Nutritional Prioritizing Tool (RFH-NPT), and the chronic liver disease questionnaire have been assessed. These patients were evaluated at a second time point after a median observation time of 500 days. Another cohort of 64 patients was collected to validate the findings.

Results

Of the included patients, 67.7 % were male with a median age of 57 years and a median Child score of 9. RFH-NPT classified 50.7 % of the patients as high-risk patients, and NRS assessed 44.6 % of the patients as moderate- to high-risk patients. RFH-NPT correlated with clinical deterioration, severity of disease (Child score, MELD score), and clinical complications such as ascites, hepatorenal syndrome, and episodes of hepatic encephalopathy. RFH-NPT was an independent predictor of clinical deterioration and transplant-free survival. Furthermore, improvement in RFH-NPT within 500 days was associated with improved survival.

Conclusion

Assessing the patients’ risk for malnutrition by RFH-NPT may be a useful predictor of disease progression and outcome for patients with chronic liver disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

CI:

Confidence interval

CLDQ:

Chronic liver disease questionnaire

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HE:

Hepatic encephalopathy

HRS:

Hepatorenal syndrome

HRQL:

Health-related quality of life

MELD:

Model for end-stage liver disease

NASH:

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

NRS:

Nutritional Risk Screening

PSC:

Primary sclerosing cholangitis

RFH-NPT:

Royal Free Hospital-Nutritional Prioritizing Tool

RFH-GA:

Royal Free Hospital-Global Assessment

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

SBP:

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

SD:

Standard deviation

SGA:

Subjective global assessment

References

  1. D’Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol. 2006;44:217–231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferreira LG, Anastacio LR, Lima AS, Correia MITD. Predictors of mortality in patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation. Nutr Hosp. 2013;28:914–919.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Propst A, Propst T, Zangerl G, Ofner D, Judmaier G, Vogel W. Prognosis and life expectancy in chronic liver disease. Dig Dis Sci. 1995;40:1805–1815.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Castellanos FM, Santana PS, Garcia JE, et al. Influence of hyponutrition on occurrence of complications and mortality among cirrhosis patients. Nutr Hosp. 2008;23:68–74.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mesejo A, Juan M, Serrano A. Liver cirrhosis and encephalopathy: clinical and metabolic consequences and nutritional support. Nutr Hosp. 2008;23:8–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Iwasa M, Iwata K, Hara N, et al. Nutrition therapy using a multidisciplinary team improves survival rates in patients with liver cirrhosis. Nutrition. 2013;29:1418–1421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Younossi ZM, Guyatt G, Kiwi M, Boparai N, King D. Development of a disease specific questionnaire to measure health related quality of life in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut. 1999;45:295–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Parkash O, Iqbal R, Jafri F, Azam I, Jafri W. Frequency of poor quality of life and predictors of health related quality of life in cirrhosis at a tertiary care hospital Pakistan. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:446.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Amodio P, Bemeur C, Butterworth R, et al. The nutritional management of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis: International Society for Hepatic Encephalopathy and Nitrogen Metabolism Consensus. Hepatology. 2013;58:325–336.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vieira PM, De-Souza DA, Oliveira LC. Nutritional assessment in hepatic cirrhosis; clinical, anthropometric, biochemical and hematological parameters. Nutr Hosp. 2013;28:1615–1621.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Landa-Galvan HV, Milke-Garcia MP, Leon-Oviedo C, et al. Nutritional assessment of alcoholic liver cirrhotic patients treated in the liver Clinic of the Mexico’s General Hospital. Nutr Hosp. 2012;27:2006–2014.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z. Ad Hoc EWG. Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr. 2003;22:321–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schneider SM, Hebuterne X. Use of nutritional scores to predict clinical outcomes in chronic diseases. Nutr Rev. 2000;58:31–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Durand F, Buyse S, Francoz C, et al. Prognostic value of muscle atrophy in cirrhosis using psoas muscle thickness on computed tomography. J Hepatol. 2014;60:1151–1157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanai T, Shiraki M, Nishimura K, et al. Sarcopenia impairs prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis. Nutrition. 2015;31:193–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Huisman EJ, Trip EJ, Siersema PD, van Hoek B, van Erpecum KJ. Protein energy malnutrition predicts complications in liver cirrhosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23:982–989.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shi S, Han J, Yan M, Wang K, Yu H, Meng Q. Nutritional risk assessment in patients with chronic liver disease. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2014;22:536–539.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

JT is supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB TRR57), H. J. & W. Hector Stiftung (M60.2), Ernst-Bertha-Grimmke-Stiftung (6/15), and European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (No. 668031).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonel Trebicka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Sarah Maria Borhofen, Carmen Gerner, and Jennifer Lehmann have contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Figure 1

Nutritional risk assessment according to RFH-NPT. After assessing acute alcoholic hepatitis and tube feeding (direct indicators for high risk for malnutrition), patients are divided into 2 groups according to presence of fluid overload before further evaluation. (Adapted from Amodio et al. “The nutritional management of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis: International Society for Hepatic Encephalopathy and Nitrogen Metabolism Consensus”, Hepatology 2013;58:325-336) (JPEG 554 kb)

Supplementary Figure 2

Nutritional risk assessment according to NRS. Impairment of the patients’ nutritional status and severity of the patients’ disease are assessed with up to 3 points each, an additional point is awarded for age above 70 years. (Adapted from Kondrup et al. Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr 2003;22:321-336.) (JPEG 508 kb)

Supplementary Figure 3

MELD and matching RFH-NPT show an excellently correlation with each other. MELD and matching RFH-NPT correlate excellently with each other in the first cohort at inclusion (A) and follow-up after 8 month (B) as well as in our validation cohort (C). Data was correlated with Spearman-correlation (JPEG 197 kb)

Supplementary Figure 4

Association of RFH-NPT- and NRS-Score with decompensation of liver disease. Mann–Whitney-testing shows that a lower RFH-NPT-Score is associated with history of variceal bleeding (A). Patients with a history of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis have significantly higher RFH-NPT-scores (B). A higher NRS-Score shows a trend towards correlation with presence of HCC (C). Data is shown as median ± SD (JPEG 179 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borhofen, S.M., Gerner, C., Lehmann, J. et al. The Royal Free Hospital-Nutritional Prioritizing Tool Is an Independent Predictor of Deterioration of Liver Function and Survival in Cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci 61, 1735–1743 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-4015-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-4015-z

Keywords

Navigation