Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do We Perform a Perfect Endoscopic Hemostasis Prophylactically with Argon Plasma Coagulation in Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Submucosal injection for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) may effect performing the prophylactic argon plasma coagulation (APC) of non-bleeding visible vessels on ulcer crater.

Aims

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical features of visible vessels in iatrogenic ulcers over time after prophylactic APC in colonic EMR.

Patients and Methods

This study was designed as a prospective study. Between August and November 2013, a total of 40 patients who were admitted underwent prophylactic APC for non-bleeding visible vessels after colonic EMR. After confirming whether visible vessels were completely coagulated or not, the number of visible vessels in ulcers was counted over a specific time period, e.g. 1, 3, 5, or 7 min.

Results

The mean number of visible vessels was significantly higher at 5 min (0.85 ± 1.14) after EMR with prophylactic APC compared to 1 and 3 min (1 min: 0.28 ± 0.60, P < 0.001; 3 min: 0.65 ± 0.87, P = 0.02) and there was no significant difference between 5 and 7 min (P = 0.31). Multivariate analysis showed that the size of the iatrogenic ulcer after EMR was associated with the occurrence of visible vessels (ulcer size >1 vs. ≤0.5 cm: OR 27.32, 95 % CI 2.86–infinity).

Conclusions

A 5-min observation of the ulcer may be advantageous for the assessment of visible vessels after performing colonic EMR with prophylactic APC, and large (>1 cm) iatrogenic ulcers were associated with the occurrence of visible vessels after colonic EMR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nelson DB, McQuaid KR, Bond JH, Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Johnston TK. Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:307–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosen L, Bub DS, Reed JF 3rd, Nastasee SA. Hemorrhage following colonoscopic polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:1126–1131.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gibbs DH, Opelka FG, Beck DE, Hicks TC, Timmcke AE, Gathright JB Jr. Postpolypectomy colonic hemorrhage. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:806–810.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim HS, Kim TI, Kim WH, et al. Risk factors for immediate postpolypectomy bleeding of the colon: a multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1333–1341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee CK, Lee SH, Park JY, et al. Prophylactic argon plasma coagulation ablation does not decrease delayed postpolypectomy bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:353–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Waye JD, Lewis BS, Yessayan S. Colonoscopy: a prospective report of complications. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992;15:347–351.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sawhney MS, Salfiti N, Nelson DB, Lederle FA, Bond JH. Risk factors for severe delayed postpolypectomy bleeding. Endoscopy. 2008;40:115–119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shioji K, Suzuki Y, Kobayashi M, et al. Prophylactic clip application does not decrease delayed bleeding after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:691–694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liaquat H, Rohn E, Rex DK. Prophylactic clip closure reduced the risk of delayed postpolypectomy hemorrhage: experience in 277 clipped large sessile or flat colorectal lesions and 247 control lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:401–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cipolletta L, Bianco MA, Rotondano G, Piscopo R, Prisco A, Garofano ML. Prospective comparison of argon plasma coagulator and heater probe in the endoscopic treatment of major peptic ulcer bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48:191–195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chau CH, Siu WT, Law BK, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing epinephrine injection plus heat probe coagulation versus epinephrine injection plus argon plasma coagulation for bleeding peptic ulcers. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:455–461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zenker M. Argon plasma coagulation. GMS Krankenhaushygiene interdisziplinar. 2008;3.

  13. Iacopini F, Petruzziello L, Marchese M, et al. Hemostasis of Dieulafoy’s lesions by argon plasma coagulation (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:20–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Takizawa K, Oda I, Gotoda T, et al. Routine coagulation of visible vessels may prevent delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection—an analysis of risk factors. Endoscopy. 2008;40:179–183.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim HSKK, Park WK, Cho KA, et al. Delayed bleeding in a colonoscopic polypectomy: an experience with 5,236 polypectomies. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2000;16:6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tolliver KA, Rex DK. Colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2008;37:229–251, ix.

  17. Kim do H, Lim SW. Analysis of delayed postpolypectomy bleeding in a colorectal clinic J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27:13–16.

  18. Chung SC, Leong HT, Chan AC, et al. Epinephrine or epinephrine plus alcohol for injection of bleeding ulcers: a prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;43:591–595.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Amano Y, Moriyama N, Suetsugu H, et al. Which types of non-bleeding visible vessels in gastric peptic ulcers should be treated by endoscopic hemostasis? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;19:13–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsuji Y, Ohata K, Ito T, et al. Risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric lesions. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:2913–2917.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Watabe H, Yamaji Y, Okamoto M, et al. Risk assessment for delayed hemorrhagic complication of colonic polypectomy: polyp-related factors and patient-related factors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:73–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Il Kwun Chung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jung, Y., Chung, I.K., Cho, Y.S. et al. Do We Perform a Perfect Endoscopic Hemostasis Prophylactically with Argon Plasma Coagulation in Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection?. Dig Dis Sci 60, 3100–3107 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3725-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3725-6

Keywords

Navigation