Intestinal Permeability Barrier in Crohn’s Disease: The Difficulty in Shifting the Paradigm
- 3k Downloads
Crohn’s disease has become a relatively common inflammatory disease of the intestine. The etiology of the disease is unknown despite a great deal of research by many talented investigators. During most of the twentieth century, the search for Crohn’s etiology focused mostly on immunological abnormalities. This dominant paradigm hindered the approval of research proposals or manuscripts dealing with other, non-immunological etiological factors or mechanisms.
In the early 1980s my research centered on the intestinal transport of lipid compounds, in general, and fat-soluble vitamins in particular . Simultaneously, I was caring for increasing numbers of patients with Crohn’s disease and felt frustrated by the dearth of basic understanding of the etiology of Crohn’s disease and the paucity of available therapeutic approaches. It was known that the disease had a heritable component since it had a clear familial clustering, but the specific genetic abnormalities or predisposing genetic factors were not known. Furthermore, no measurable parameters existed that would enable us to identify the disease in its subclinical phase in the healthy relatives of Crohn’s disease patients.
In the early 1980s, I was approached by the father of a patient with Crohn’s who was frustrated by the lack of progress in understanding the pathogenesis of the disease or its effective therapy. He searched the literature regarding Crohn’s and conferred with several investigators, but he was not satisfied with the outcomes of their efforts. He asked if I would be interested in searching for new causes of Crohn’s disease and stated that he was willing to fund a preliminary pilot project through his family foundation to search for new etiological leads .
I was aware of three small studies that looked at a newly recognized function of the intestine, namely, the barrier function of the bowel which limits the absorption of antigenic, infectious or toxic substances from the intestinal lumen into the systemic circulation and was referred to as “intestinal permeability.” These three articles reported increased intestinal permeability in patients with active Crohn’s [3, 4, 5] but did not determine whether the increase in permeability in patients with the disease was secondary to the inflammation itself or whether it was an underlying etiological factor in the pathogenesis of the disease.
Since Crohn’s has a clear familial pattern and a genetic predisposition, I reasoned that measuring intestinal permeability not only in patients with the active disease but also in their healthy relatives could clarify whether the increase in intestinal permeability is an underlying etiological factor or simply a consequence of inflammation.
I was fortunate to attract Dr. Jerome Rotter, a geneticist who was studying families with Crohn’s disease, to help recruit families to the study and to participate in the investigation together with his team.
We developed a simplified and subject-friendly way to measure intestinal permeability in the patients and their family members. A talented biochemist, Dr. Thomas Delahunty, joined my laboratory and developed an accurate and relatively simple method to measure permeability markers in the collected urine of the subjects . We used a partially absorbed water-soluble, non-metabolized marker molecule that was ingested with a standard meal in an outpatient setting. Since the marker is not metabolized, the portion that can penetrate the intestinal permeability barrier is secreted in the urine and can be measured in a timed collection. We chose low molecular weight polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG-400) as the marker and tested its permeability and its experimental reproducibility in normal control subjects.
Once the system was ready we studied ten families with 11 members with active Crohn’s and 32 of their clinically normal unaffected relatives and compared their permeability measurements with those measured in normal control subjects without a family history of Crohn’s.
We submitted the article detailing the findings to several leading gastroenterology journals in succession. The article was rejected as “an idea or concept that could not have any possible bearing on Crohn’s disease pathogenesis” and “had no possible research or clinical importance.” After several rejections we submitted the article to a general internal medicine journal where editorial policies and reviewers were not as firmly entrenched in the dogmatic immunological paradigm of the day .
The etiological paradigm of Crohn’s disease has been expanded to include not only immunological abnormalities but also abnormalities in the structure and functions of the intestinal tight junctions , interactions between luminal antigens and the intestinal microbiome with the protective barrier, and immunological defenses of the intestinal mucosa. The expanded knowledge of the genetic basis of the disease provides a fuller understanding of the pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease and new approaches to its therapy and prevention.
In retrospect, it was difficult to investigate and to publish a new idea that was not part of the accepted paradigm of the day. Were it not for a nontraditional source of funding for the initial clinical experiment and the willingness of patients and their family members to participate, we would not have been able to do the study. The resistance to the publication of the results was not caused by the reviewers’ concerns about our approach or methodology but, rather, by their unwillingness to consider new ideas outside of the established paradigm of the time. It was disheartening to delineate data that clearly supported a new hypothesis and yet not to be able to have it accepted on the merit of the facts. However, I learned from the experience to not be leery of challenging the existing paradigm as long as the experimental design and methods are scientifically sound and as long as I was willing to anticipate the resistance of the scientific and medical community. In retrospect, it is likely that success in having the new paradigm accepted also benefitted from my having done the pivotal observations in patients with the disease rather than experiments done in cell lines or laboratory animals. Despite the initial difficulties in having a new idea accepted by the medical community, the long-term outcomes of such efforts are clearly worthwhile (Fig. 2).
The author is grateful to the Goldsmith Foundation of Los Angeles for having the vision and courage to fund a new etiological investigation of Crohn’s disease.
- 2.The Goldsmith Family Foundation. Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar