Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In Recurrent C. difficile, the CRP Response to the Primary C. difficile Infection Predicts Whether the Same Strain or a Different Strain will Cause a Second Infection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Clostridium difficile is the leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and is associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality. There is a wide variance in disease severity with some patients suffering a single, self-limiting episode of diarrhoea while others suffer more intractable problems with recurrent attacks or toxic dilatation. Numerous different C. difficile ribotypes exist, some of which are considered hypervirulent. The magnitude of toxin production alone is not sufficient to explain the varying virulence of these ribotypes, suggesting the involvement of other mechanisms.

Methods

To test the same patient’s response to infection with different C. difficile ribotypes, we reviewed 45 patients who suffered two episodes of C. difficile infection and determined by ribotyping and MLVA whether the second episode was due to the same strain or a different strain.

Results

Patients harbouring a different strain had significantly higher C-reactive protein (CRP) responses on the first assessed infection (143 mg/L ± 20 vs. 55 ± 9.63, p = 0.0001) and a significantly lower CRP on reinfection (p = 0.048). Same strain patients had a non-significant increase in CRP response on second infection.

Conclusions

This suggests that the inflammatory response to C. difficile is determined by an interaction between host immunobiology, previous exposure and C. difficile strain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ananthakrishnan AN. Clostridium difficile infection: epidemiology, risk factors and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;8:17–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbut F, Richard A, Hamadi K, Chomette V, Burghoffer B, Petit JC. Epidemiology of recurrences or reinfections of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:2386–2388.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartlett JG, Gerding DN. Clinical recognition and diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(Suppl 1):S12–S18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Belmares J, Gerding DN, Parada JP, Miskevics S, Weaver F, Johnson S. Outcome of metronidazole therapy for Clostridium difficile disease and correlation with a scoring system. J Infect. 2007;55:495–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhangu S, Bhangu A, Nightingale P, Michael A. Mortality and risk stratification in patients with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:241–246.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Drudy D, Calabi E, Kyne L, et al. Human antibody response to surface layer proteins in Clostridium difficile infection. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2004;41:237–242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Farne HA, Martin NK, Main J, Orchard T, Tyrrell-Price J. C-reactive protein is a useful predictor of metronidazole treatment failure in mild-to-moderate Clostridium difficile infection. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. Epub. 09/29/2012.

  8. HPA Standards Unit MSD. Processing of faeces for Clostridium difficile. Health Protection Agency report B10 (under review). 2012.

  9. Johal SS, Lambert CP, Hammond J, James PD, Borriello SP, Mahida YR. Colonic IgA producing cells and macrophages are reduced in recurrent and non-recurrent Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57:973–979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim J, Lee KL, Jeong JB, et al. Proton pump inhibitors as a risk factor for recurrence of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:3573–3577.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kyne L, Warny M, Qamar A, Kelly CP. Association between antibody response to toxin A and protection against recurrent Clostridium difficile diarrhoea. Lancet. 2001;357:189–193.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Langhorst J, Elsenbruch S, Koelzer J, Rueffer A, Michalsen A, Dobos GJ. Noninvasive markers in the assessment of intestinal inflammation in inflammatory bowel diseases: performance of fecal lactoferrin, calprotectin, and PMN-elastase, CRP, and clinical indices. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:162–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32:920–924.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marsh JW, O’Leary MM, Shutt KA, et al. Multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis for investigation of Clostridium difficile transmission in Hospitals. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:2558–2566.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stubbs SL, Brazier JS, O’Neill GL, Duerden BI. PCR targeted to the 16S–23S rRNA gene intergenic spacer region of Clostridium difficile and construction of a library consisting of 116 different PCR ribotypes. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:461–463.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tanner HE, Hardy KJ, Hawkey PM. Coexistence of multiple multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis subtypes of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 027 strains within fecal specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:985–987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. van den Berg RJ, Schaap I, Templeton KE, Klaassen CH, Kuijper EJ. Typing and subtyping of Clostridium difficile isolates by using multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:1024–1028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wanahita A, Goldsmith EA, Musher DM. Conditions associated with leukocytosis in a tertiary care hospital, with particular attention to the role of infection caused by Clostridium difficile. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:1585–1592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wanahita A, Goldsmith EA, Marino BJ, Musher DM. Clostridium difficile infection in patients with unexplained leukocytosis. Am J Med. 2003;115:543–546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilcox M. Clostridium difficile ribotyping network for England and Northern Ireland 2008/9 report. Health Protection Agency, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wilcox MH, Fawley WN, Settle CD, Davidson A. Recurrence of symptoms in Clostridium difficile infection–relapse or reinfection? J Hosp Infect. 1998;38:93–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zar FA, Bakkanagari SR, Moorthi KM, Davis MB. A comparison of vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, stratified by disease severity. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:302–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

K.B. is grateful for support from the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre funding scheme.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Fairweather.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, K., d’Arc, S., Setty, N. et al. In Recurrent C. difficile, the CRP Response to the Primary C. difficile Infection Predicts Whether the Same Strain or a Different Strain will Cause a Second Infection. Dig Dis Sci 58, 1683–1688 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2534-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2534-4

Keywords

Navigation