Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 57, Issue 5, pp 1134–1143 | Cite as

The Impact of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Education on Radiation Exposure to Experienced Endoscopist: “Trainee Effect”

  • Erkin OztasEmail author
  • Erkan Parlak
  • Fahrettin Kucukay
  • Mehmet Arhan
  • Ulku Daglı
  • Digdem Ozer Etik
  • Fatih Oguz Onder
  • Tulay Olcer
  • Nurgul Sasmaz
Original Article



Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), as with other fluoroscopic procedures, carries the risk of exposure of staff to radiation. However, over the last two decades, only a few studies have investigated this risk.


The aim of this work was to evaluate the dose of radiation exposure to staff participating in ERCP procedures in a busy teaching hospital that performs more than 1,850 procedures annually.


The entire ERCP staff consisted of the experienced endoscopist, the assistant, and two nurses who were responsible for monitoring patients as well as keeping their heads in position during the procedure. RAD DOSE NEB.226 dosimeters, which were provided by the Turkish Atomic Energy Authority, were used for this study.


Data on 110 consecutive therapeutic ERCP procedures was recorded. The mean fluoroscopy time was 5.65 ± 4.71 min. The mean fluoroscopy time of the 61 procedures performed by an experienced endoscopist alone was 5.41 ± 4.65 min, whereas the mean fluoroscopy time for the 49 procedures during which an assistant was involved was 5.94 ± 4.81 min (p = 0.56). In terms of median dose of ionizing radiation exposure to the eyes, the dose measurement per procedure in which the primary endoscopist participated alone was 72 microsievert (μSv), compared to 92 μSv when an assistant took part in the proceedings. Considering that the recommended annual equivalent dose limit to the lens of the eye is 150 mSv, by performing 1,850 procedures annually, the primary endoscopist exceeds this limit.


Based on our results, taking into consideration the heavy workload in our hospital, it would seem that more experienced endoscopists are required to help provide training in ERCP, and that the use of lead acrylic goggles is required to decrease radiation exposure to the eyes.


ERCP education Radiation exposure Trainee effect Protection 


Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    McCune WS, Shorb PE, Moscovitz H. Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of Vater: a preliminary report. Ann Surg. 1968;167:752–756.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brugge WR, Van Dam J. Pancreatic and biliary endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1808–1816.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campbell N, Sparrow K, Fortier M, Ponich T. Practical radiation safety and protection for the endoscopist during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:552–557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amis ES Jr. Risks of radiation exposure in the endoscopy suite: principles, cautions, and risks to patients and endoscopy staff. Tech Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;9:213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    International Commission on Radiation Protection. Radiation and your patient: a guide for medical practitioners. Ann ICRP. 2001;31:5–31.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    International Commission on Radiation Protection. Chapter 5: The system of radiological protection of humans. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2–4):81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    International Commission on Radiation Protection. Summary of recommendations. Ann ICRP. 1991;21(1–3):67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Germanaud J, Legoux JL, Sabattier R, Causse X, Trinh DH. Radiation protection of operators during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1993;17:259–263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin CJ. A review of radiology staff doses and dose monitoring requirements. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2009;136:140–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Larkin CJ, Workman A, Wright RE, Tham TC. Radiation doses to patients during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:161–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Olgar T, Bor D, Berkmen G, Yazar T. Patient and staff doses for some complex x-ray examinations. J Radiol Prot. 2009;29:393–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsalafoutas IA, Paraskeva KD, Yakoumakis EN, Vassilaki AE, et al. Radiation doses to patients from endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography examinations and image quality considerations. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2003;106:241–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heyd RL, Kopecky KK, Sherman S, Lehman GA, Stockberger SM. Radiation exposure to patients and personnel during interventional ERCP at a teaching institution. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:287–292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buls N, Pages J, Mana F, Osteaux M. Patient and staff exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Br J Radiol. 2002;75:435–443.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ruiz-Cruces R, Perez-Martinez M, Martin-Palanca A, Flores A, et al. Patient dose in radiologically guided interventional vascular procedures: conventional versus digital systems. Radiology. 1997;205:385–393.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McParland BJ. A study of patient radiation doses in interventional radiological procedures. Br J Radiol. 1998;71:175–185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sulieman A, Elzaki M, Khalil M. Occupational exposure to staff during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in Sudan. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011;144(1–4):530–533.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cohen RV, Aldred MA, Paes WS, Fausto AM, et al. How safe is ERCP to the endoscopist? Surg Endosc. 1997;11:615–617.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Naidu LS, Singhal S, Preece DE, Vohrah A, Loft DE. Radiation exposure to personnel performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Postgrad Med J. 2005;81:660–662.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aroua A, Besancon A, Buchillier-Decka I, Trueb P, et al. Adult reference levels in diagnostic and interventional radiology for temporary use in Switzerland. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2004;111:289–295.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hausler U, Czarwinski R, Brix G. Radiation exposure of medical staff from interventional X-ray procedures: a multicentre study. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:2000–2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Johlin FC, Pelsang RE, Greenleaf M. Phantom study to determine radiation exposure to medical personnel involved in ERCP fluoroscopy and its reduction through equipment and behavior modifications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:893–897.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Uradomo LT, Lustberg ME, Darwin PE. Effect of physician training on fluoroscopy time during ERCP. Dig Dis Sci. 2006;51:909–914.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hoskins PR, Williams JR. Influence of radiologist grade on fluoroscopic patient dose. Br J Radiol. 1992;65:1119–1123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Warren-Forward HM, Haddaway MJ, Temperton DH, McCall IW. Dose-area product readings for fluoroscopic and plain film examinations, including an analysis of the source of variation for barium enema examinations. Br J Radiol. 1998;71:961–967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vehmas T, Kuosma E. Influence of radiologists’ sex and training on fluoroscopy doses during barium enema. Br J Radiol. 2001;74:255–258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim E, McLoughlin M, Lam EC, Amar J, et al. Prospective analysis of fluoroscopy duration during ERCP: critical determinants. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:50–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jorgensen JE, Rubenstein JH, Goodsitt MM, Elta GH. Radiation doses to ERCP patients are significantly lower with experienced endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:58–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
    Uradomo LT, Goldberg EM, Darwin PE. Time-limited fluoroscopy to reduce radiation exposure during ERCP: a prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:84–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chen MY, Van Swearingen FL, Mitchell R, Ott DJ. Radiation exposure during ERCP: effect of a protective shield. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;43:1–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vehmas T. Hawthorne effect: shortening of fluoroscopy times during radiation measurement studies. Br J Radiol. 1997;70:1053–1055.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erkin Oztas
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Erkan Parlak
    • 1
  • Fahrettin Kucukay
    • 2
  • Mehmet Arhan
    • 1
  • Ulku Daglı
    • 1
  • Digdem Ozer Etik
    • 1
  • Fatih Oguz Onder
    • 1
  • Tulay Olcer
    • 2
  • Nurgul Sasmaz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologyTurkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research HospitalAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyTurkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research HospitalAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Ankara Yuksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Gastroenteroloji ServisiAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations