Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of Sterilization of Reusable Endoscopic Biopsy Forceps by Autoclaving and Ethylene Oxide Gas

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Aims

Every country has standardized reprocessing guidelines for reducing the risk of microorganism transmission via reusable biopsy forceps. Sterilization is performed either by autoclaving or with the use of ethylene oxide (EO) gas. However, there are no clear standard global recommendations. The aim of this study was to determine whether EO gas or autoclaving is a safer and more effective method for the sterilization of reusable forceps.

Methods

This was a prospective study conducted at multiple tertiary referral centers. Seventy reusable biopsy forceps that had been reused at least 20 times each were collected from six endoscopy centers. In all, 61 forceps from five centers were sterilized using EO gas, and the nine forceps from the remaining center were placed in an autoclave. We performed real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and hepatitis B virus and performed bacterial cultures on the reusable forceps, which were cut into 2- to 3-cm sections. The forceps were also scanned with an electron microscope (EM) to detect surface damage and contamination.

Results

Escherichia coli bacteria were cultured from 2 of the 61 (3.3%) reusable biopsy forceps sterilized with EO gas. On EM scanning, abundant debris and tissue materials remained on the cup surfaces of the reused biopsy forceps and on their inner wires. No microorganisms were found on the autoclaved forceps.

Conclusions

Sterilization with EO gas may be inadequate because the complicated structure of the forceps may interfere with sterilization. Therefore, for optimum safety, reusable biopsy forceps should be sterilized by autoclaving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kimmey MB, Burnett DA, Carr-Locke DL, et al. Transmission of infection by gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39:885–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Spach DH, Silverstein FE, Stamm WE. Transmission of infection by gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:117–128.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beilenhoff U, Neumann CS, Rey JF, et al. ESGE-ESGENA Guideline: cleaning and disinfection in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2008;40:939–957. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1077722.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jung M, Beilenhoff U, Pietsch M, Kraft B, Rippin G. Standardized reprocessing of reusable colonoscopy biopsy forceps is effective: results of a German multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2003;35:197–202. doi:10.1055/s-2003-37270.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Favero MS, Bond WW. Disinfection of medical and surgical materials. In: Block SS, ed. Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001:881–917.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kim Y-T. Introduction of proposed guideline for endoscopy disinfection. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;40:49.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wilkinson M, Simmons N, Bramble M, et al. Report of the Working Party of the Endoscopy Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology on the reuse of endoscopic accessories. Gut. 1998;42:304–306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tandon RK. Disinfection of gastrointestinal endoscopes and accessories. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;15:G69–G72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Systchenko R, Marchetti B, Canard JN, et al. Guidelines of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy: recommendations for setting up cleaning and disinfection procedures in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2000;32:807–818. doi:10.1055/s-2000-7710.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Alvarado CJ, Reichelderfer M. APIC guideline for infection prevention and control in flexible endoscopy. Association for Professionals in Infection Control. Am J Infect Control. 2000;28:138–155. doi:S0196655300780515.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson DB, Jarvis WR, Rutala WA, et al. Multi-society guideline for reprocessing flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003;24:532–537. doi:10.1086/502237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Banerjee S, Shen B, Nelson DB, et al. Infection control during GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:781–790. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2008.01.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ogoshi K. Reprocessing of gastrointestinal endoscopic accessories. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;15:G82–G85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee RM, Kozarek RA, Sumida SE, Raltz SL. Risk of contamination of sterile biopsy forceps in disinfected endoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:377–381. doi:S001651079800100X.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kozarek RA, Attia FM, Sumida SE, et al. Reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective evaluation of cleaning, function, adequacy of tissue specimen, and durability. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:747–750. doi:10.1067/mge.2001.114055.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shim TS, Chi HS, Lee SD, et al. Adequately washed bronchoscope does not induce false-positive amplification tests on bronchial aspirates in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Chest. 2002;121:774–781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Abe A, Inoue K, Tanaka T, et al. Quantitation of hepatitis B virus genomic DNA by real-time detection PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:2899–2903.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Connor HJ, Axon AT. Gastrointestinal endoscopy: infection and disinfection. Gut. 1983;24:1067–1077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Langenberg W, Rauws EA, Oudbier JH, Tytgat GN. Patient-to-patient transmission of Campylobacter pylori infection by fiberoptic gastroduodenoscopy and biopsy. J Infect Dis. 1990;161:507–511.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dwyer DM, Klein EG, Istre GR, Robinson MG, Neumann DA, McCoy GA. Salmonella newport infections transmitted by fiberoptic colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1987;33:84–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bronowicki JP, Venard V, Botte C, et al. Patient-to-patient transmission of hepatitis C virus during colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:237–240. doi:10.1056/NEJM199707243370404.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Alfa MJ, Castillo J. Impact of FDA policy change on the reuse of single-use medical devices in Michigan hospitals. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32:337–341. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2004.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fireman Z. Biopsy forceps: reusable or disposable? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:1089–1092. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04429.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hambrick D 3rd. Reprocessing of single-use endoscopic biopsy forceps and snares. One hospital’s study. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2001;24:112–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Merritt K, Hitchins VM, Brown SA. Safety and cleaning of medical materials and devices. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53:131–136. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(2000)53:2<131:AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-I.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Deprez PH, Horsmans Y, Van Hassel M, Hoang P, Piessevaux H, Geubel A. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective cost evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:262–265. doi:S0016510700262603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rizzo J, Bernstein D, Gress F. A performance, safety and cost comparison of reusable and disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:257–261. doi:S0016510700514291.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wolfsen HC. Advantages of reusable accessories. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2000;10:349–359.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang R, Ng S, Nichol M, Laine L. A cost and performance evaluation of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:266–270. doi:S0016510700499414.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byung Chul Yoon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoon, J.H., Yoon, B.C., Lee, H.L. et al. Comparison of Sterilization of Reusable Endoscopic Biopsy Forceps by Autoclaving and Ethylene Oxide Gas. Dig Dis Sci 57, 405–412 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1884-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1884-7

Keywords

Navigation