Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 56, Issue 9, pp 2623–2630 | Cite as

Recommendations for Post-Polypectomy Surveillance in Community Practice

  • David F. Ransohoff
  • Bonnie Yankaskas
  • Ziya Gizlice
  • Lisa Gangarosa
Original Article

Abstract

Background

After colon cancer screening, large numbers of persons discovered with colon polyps may receive post-polypectomy surveillance with multiple colonoscopy examinations over time. Decisions about surveillance interval are based in part on polyp size, histology, and number.

Aims

To learn physicians’ recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance from physicians’ office charts.

Methods

Among 322 physicians performing colonoscopy in 126 practices in N. Carolina, offices of 152 physicians in 55 practices were visited to extract chart data, for each physician, on 125 consecutive persons having colonoscopy in 2003. Subjects included persons with first-time colonoscopy and no positive family history or other indication beyond colonoscopy findings that might affect post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations. Data were extracted about demographics, reason for colonoscopy, family history, symptoms, bowel prep, extent of examination, and features of each polyp including location, size, histology. Recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance were noted.

Results

Among 10,089 first-time colonoscopy examinations, hyperplastic polyps were found in 4.5% of subjects, in whom follow-up by 4–6 years was recommended in 24%, sooner than recommended in guidelines. Of the 6.6% of persons with only small adenomas, 35% were recommended to return in 1–3 years (sooner than recommended in some guidelines) and 77% by 6 years. Surveillance interval tended to be shorter if colon prep was less than “excellent.” Prep quality was not reported for 32% of examinations.

Conclusions

Surveillance intervals after polypectomy of low-risk polyps may be more aggressive than guidelines recommend. The quality of post-polypectomy surveillance might be improved by increased attention to guidelines, bowel prep, and reporting.

Keywords

Colonoscopy screening Colon cancer surveillance Colonoscopy guidelines Colonoscopy quality 

References

  1. 1.
    Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:162–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, Larkin GN, Rogge JD, Ransohoff DF. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:169–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atkin WA. UK flexible sigmoidoscopy screening trial investigators. Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: Baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1291–1300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vatn MH, Stalsberg H. The prevalence of polyps of the large intestine in Oslo: An autopsy study. Cancer. 1982;49:819–825.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Williams AR, Balasooriya BA, Day DW. Polyps and cancer of the large bowel: a necropsy study in Liverpool. Gut. 1982;23:835–842.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rex DK, Lieberman DA. Feasibility of colonoscopy screening: Discussion of issues and recommendations regarding implementation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:662–667.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harewood GC, Lieberman DA. Colonoscopy practice patterns since introduction of medicare coverage for average-risk screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:72–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maguire P. Colonoscopy screening gains momentum, but problems remain. ACP-ASIM Obs. 2002;22:16–17.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rosson RS, Spiro HM. Screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:356–357; author reply 357.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kolata G. 50 and ready for a colonoscopy? Doctors say there is often a wait. New York Times, December 8, 2003. Sect. A1, A23.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Laiyemo AO, Pinsky PF, Marcus PM, et al. Utilization and yield of surveillance colonoscopy in the continued follow-up study of the polyp prevention trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:562–567; quiz 497.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boolchand V, Olds G, Singh J, Singh P, Chak A, Cooper GS. Colorectal screening after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:654–659.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:594–642.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: Clinical guidelines and rationale-update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:544–560.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:130–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ransohoff DF. Colon cancer screening in 2005: Status and challenges. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1685–1695.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mysliwiec PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN, Ransohoff DF. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:264–271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, et al. Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:73–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Colonoscopy in the screening and surveillance of individuals at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Manchester, MA 01944; 1997 ASGE Publication No. 1030.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bond JH. Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with colorectal polyps. Practice parameters committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:3053–3063.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith RA, von Eschenbach AC, Wender R, et al. American cancer society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: Update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers. CA CA Cancer J Clin. 2001;51:38–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bond JH. For the practice parameters committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Polyp guideline: Diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with nonfamilial colorectal polyps. The practice parameters committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:836–843.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: A consensus update by the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer and the American cancer society. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1872–1885.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hewett DG, Rex DK. Improving colonoscopy quality through health-care payment reform. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1925–1933.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Laiyemo AO, Murphy G, Albert PS, et al. Postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: predictive accuracy for advanced adenoma at 4 years. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:419–426.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ransohoff DF, McNaughton Collins M, Fowler FJ. Why is prostate cancer screening so common when the evidence is so uncertain? A system without negative feedback. Am J Med. 2002;113:663–667.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV, et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA. 2008;299:1027–1035.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Urbach DR, Rabeneck L. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:1–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ransohoff DF. How much does colonoscopy reduce colon cancer mortality? Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:50–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RL. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2533–2541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:1624–1633.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • David F. Ransohoff
    • 1
  • Bonnie Yankaskas
    • 2
  • Ziya Gizlice
    • 3
  • Lisa Gangarosa
    • 4
  1. 1.Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, CB 7080University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.CB 7510University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  3. 3.CB 7426University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  4. 4.CB 7080University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations