Abstract
Background
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is frequently used for staging of esophageal malignancies prior to esophagectomy.
Aims
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of elapsed time between endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) staging and esophagectomy on the accuracy of EUS T- and N-staging.
Methods
This was a retrospective case series of 45 patients with esophageal malignancy who underwent staging EUS and subsequent esophagectomy at our center without neoadjuvant therapy between 2000 and 2009. The main outcome measurements were accuracy of EUS T- and N-staging when compared with surgical pathology.
Results
EUS staging was accurate in 55.6% of patients for tumor stage, and in 75.6% of patients for nodal stage. The median time between EUS and esophagectomy was 26 days (range 3–64). Among patients with surgery performed 3–15, 16–30, and 31–64 days after EUS, EUS tumor staging was accurate in 90.9, 47.4, and 40.0%, respectively (P = 0.02). EUS nodal staging among patients with surgery performed 3–15, 16–30, or 31–64 days after EUS was accurate in 63.6, 84.2, and 73.3% of cases, respectively (P = 0.44). Among the 20 patients for whom T-stage was discordant, 45% were understaged and 55% were overstaged by EUS. There were 11 patients in whom N-stage was discordant; 45.5% were understaged and 54.5% were overstaged.
Conclusions
Pathologic T-staging is concordant with EUS T-staging when esophagectomy is performed within 15 days of endoscopic evaluation. Correlation between EUS and pathologic N-staging is unlikely to be affected by length of time between EUS and esophagectomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Van Vliet EPM, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Hunink MGM, Kuipers EJ, Siersema PD. Staging investigations for oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2008;98:547–557.
Puli SR, Reddy JBK, Bechtold ML, Antillon D, Ibdah JA, Antillon MR. Staging accuracy of esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:1479–1490.
Pech O, Gunter E, Dusemund F, Origer J, Lorenz D, Ell C. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in preoperative staging of esophageal cancer: results from a referral center for early esophageal cancer. Endoscopy. 2010;42:456–461.
Catalano MF, Sivak MV Jr, Bedford RA, et al. Observer variation and reproducibility of endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;41:115–120.
Burtin P, Napoleon B, Palazzo L, Roseau G, Souquet JC, Cales P. Interobserver agreement in endoscopic ultrasonography staging of esophageal and cardia cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;43:20–24.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Esophageal cancer. v.1. 2010. www.nccn.org. Accessed July 5, 2010.
Walker AJ, Spier BJ, Perlman SB et al. Integrated PET/CT fusion imaging and endoscopic ultrasound in the pre-operative staging and evaluation of esophageal cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2011;13:166–171.
Kutup A, Link BC, Schurr PG, et al. Quality control of endoscopic ultrasound in preoperative staging of esophageal cancer. Endoscopy. 2007;39:715–719.
Zuccaro G, Rice TW, Vargo JJ, et al. Endoscopic errors in esophageal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:601–606.
Holscher AH, Dittler HJ, Siewert JR. Staging of squamous esophageal cancer: accuracy and value. World J Surg. 1994;18:312–320.
Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema MJ, Clain JE, et al. Impact of lymph node staging on therapy of esophageal carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1626–1635.
Conflict of interest
None to report.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fisher, J.M., Pohl, H., Gordon, S.R. et al. The Impact of Time Elapsed Between Endoscopic Ultrasound and Esophagectomy on Concordance of Ultrasonographic and Pathologic Staging of Esophageal Malignancy. Dig Dis Sci 56, 2987–2991 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1716-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1716-9