Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does Anesthesiologist-Directed Sedation for ERCP Improve Deep Cannulation and Complication Rates?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

While some gastroenterologists provide their own sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), others utilize anesthesiologists. There is limited information comparing cannulation success and complication rates between these two approaches. Theoretically, anesthesiologist-directed sedation (ADS) may lead to an improved deep cannulation rate by virtue of using deeper and more constant levels of sedation and by removing the minute-by-minute medication management and physiologic monitoring responsibilities from the endoscopy team.

Aims

To compare ERCP deep cannulation success and complications between gastroenterologist-directed sedation (GDS) and ADS.

Methods

All ERCPs completed by senior advanced endoscopists at a tertiary referral center over a 2-year period were reviewed. During the first year, all ERCP sedation was performed with GDS utilizing a narcotic and a benzodiazepine. Due to a change in division policy and practice, during the second year, all ERCP sedation was provided by ADS. Patients with prior papillary interventions were excluded. Demographics, procedure indications, deep cannulation success, sedation provider, and procedural complications were recorded.

Results

A total of 367 patients were studied: 178 (48.5%) GDS and 189 (51.5%) ADS. There was no difference in the groups with respect to race, age, and gender. Four patients (2.3%) in the GDS group could not be sedated. There were two deaths, one in each group; one death was due to cholangitis/sepsis and the other was due to post-ERCP pancreatitis. The overall cannulation success rates were similar between the two groups (94.4% vs. 95.2%, P = 0.36).

Conclusions

Deep ductal cannulation rates between GDS and ADS are similar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohen LB, Delegge MH, Aisenberg J, et al. AGA Institute review of endoscopic sedation. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:675–701.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen LB, Dubovsky AN, Aisenberg J, et al. Propofol for endoscopic sedation: A protocol for safe and effective administration by the gastroenterologist. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:725–732.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dewitt J, McGreevy K, Sherman S, et al. Nurse-administered propofol sedation compared with midazolam and meperidine for EUS: A prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:499–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Heuss LT, Schnieper P, Drewe J, et al. Risk stratification and safe administration of propofol by registered nurses supervised by the gastroenterologist: a prospective observational study of more than 2000 cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:664–671.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Külling D, Rothenbühler R, Inauen W. Safety of nonanesthetist sedation with propofol for outpatient colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Endoscopy. 2003;35:679–682.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rex DK, Heuss LT, Walker JA, et al. Trained registered nurses/endoscopy teams can administer propofol safely for endoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:1384–1391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Riphaus A, Stergiou N, Wehrmann T. Sedation with propofol for routine ERCP in high-risk octogenarians: A randomized, controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1957–1963.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sipe BW, Rex DK, Latinovich D, et al. Propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: Administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:815–825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vargo JJ, Zuccaro G Jr, Dumot JA, et al. Gastroenterologist-administered propofol versus meperidine and midazolam for advanced upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:8–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Aisenberg J, Brill JV, Ladabaum U, et al. Sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy: new practices, new economics. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:996–1000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen LB, Wecsler JS, Gaetano JN, et al. Endoscopic sedation in the United States: Results from a nationwide survey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:967–974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Petersen BT. ERCP outcomes: Defining the operators, experience, and environments. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:953–958.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:383–393.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: A prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:425–434.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Freeman ML, Guda NM. ERCP cannulation: A review of reported techniques. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:112–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Choudari CP, Sherman S, Fogel EL, et al. Success of ERCP at a referral center after a previously unsuccessful attempt. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:478–483.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mallery JS, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, et al. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:633–638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel S, Vargo JJ, Khandwala F, et al. Deep sedation occurs frequently during elective endoscopy with meperidine and midazolam. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:2689–2695.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Qadeer MA, Vargo JJ, Khandwala F, et al. Propofol versus traditional sedative agents for gastrointestinal endoscopy: A meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:1049–1056.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wehrmann T, Kokabpick S, Lembcke B, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous propofol sedation during routine ERCP: A prospective, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:677–683.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kongkam P, Rerknimitr R, Punyathavorn S, et al. Propofol infusion versus intermittent meperidine and midazolam injection for conscious sedation in ERCP. J Gastrointest Liver Dis. 2008;17:291–297.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schilling D, Rosenbaum A, Schweizer S, et al. Sedation with propofol for interventional endoscopy by trained nurses in high-risk octogenarians: A prospective, randomized, controlled study. Endoscopy. 2009;41:295–298.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rex DK, Deenadayalu VP, Eid E, et al. Endoscopist-directed administration of propofol: A worldwide safety experience. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:1229–1237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:1004–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schutz SM, Abbott RM. Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:535–539.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Paresh P. Mehta

  2. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A30, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA

    John J. Vargo, John A. Dumot, Mansour A. Parsi & Gregory Zuccaro

  3. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Rocio Lopez

Authors
  1. Paresh P. Mehta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John J. Vargo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John A. Dumot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mansour A. Parsi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rocio Lopez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gregory Zuccaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John J. Vargo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehta, P.P., Vargo, J.J., Dumot, J.A. et al. Does Anesthesiologist-Directed Sedation for ERCP Improve Deep Cannulation and Complication Rates?. Dig Dis Sci 56, 2185–2190 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1568-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1568-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation