Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

K-ras Mutations Correlate with Atypical Cytology and Elevated CEA Levels in Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Benign pancreatic cystic neoplasms are important precursors to pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and offer the opportunity to prevent cancer. Conversely, prevention only occurs with surgical resection associated with significant morbidity and mortality, while the natural history of small cystic neoplasms is a slow and uncertain progression to malignancy. Markers that predict progression to malignancy are needed. Cyst fluid DNA analysis including K-ras mutations may predict more aggressive natural history of pancreatic cystic neoplasms.

Methods

Sixty patients with pancreatic cysts measuring less than 3 cm without solid component or pancreatic ductal dilation underwent EUS with fine needle aspiration. Nine had surgical resection. Cyst fluid was tested for cytology, CEA levels, and DNA analysis including K-ras mutations, and eight loss of heterozygosity mutations. Mutations were correlated with findings of atypia and CEA levels.

Results

Cyst fluid K-ras mutation was found in 30% of patients. Patients with mutated K-ras were more likely to have atypia on cytology or pathology (39 vs. 14%) and higher CEA (median 591 vs. 42) compared to wild-type K-ras. K-ras mutants were more likely to have two or more loss of heterozygosity mutations. Loss of heterozygosity mutations did not correlate with atypia or CEA levels.

Conclusions

Cyst fluid K-ras mutation correlates with other markers of aggressive cyst behavior. EUS with cyst DNA analysis may alter management of smaller pancreatic cysts when surgery might otherwise be deferred. Further studies of cyst fluid DNA and long-term outcomes are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tanaka M, Chari S, Adsay V, et al. International consensus guidelines for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2006;6:17–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rodriguez J, Salvia R, Crippa S, et al. Branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: observations in 145 patients who underwent resection. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:72–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Levy P, Jouannaud V, O’Toole D, et al. Natural history of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas: actuarial risk of malignancy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hruban R, Takaori K, Klimstra D, et al. An illustrated consensus on the classification of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:977–987.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gompel C. Atlas of diagnostic cytology. New York: Wiley; 1978:74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brugge W, Lewandrowski K, Lee-Lewandrowski E, et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a report of the cooperative pancreatic cyst study. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:1330–1336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van der Waij L, Dullemen H, Porte R, et al. Cyst fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: a pooled analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pais S, Attasaranya S, Leblanc J, et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: correlation with surgical histopathology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:489–495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pinto M, Meriano F. Diagnosis of cystic pancreatic lesions by cytologic examination and carcinoembryonic antigen and amylase assays of cyst contents. Acta Cytol. 1991;35:456–463.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Khalid A, McGrath K, Zahid M, et al. The role of pancreatic cyst fluid molecular analysis in predicting cyst pathology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:967–973.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Linder J, Geenen J, Catalano M. Cyst fluid analysis obtained by EUS-guided FNA in the evaluation of discrete cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: a prospective single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Froussard J, Amouyal P, Amouyal G, et al. Performance of endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1516–1524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khalid A, Brugge W. ACG practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2339–2349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brugge W. Should all pancreatic cystic lesions be resected? Cyst-fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:390–391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vogelstein B, Fearon E, Hamilton SR, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. New England J Med. 1988;319:555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Z’graggen K, Rivera J, Compton C, et al. Prevalence of activating K-ras mutations in the evolutionary stages of neoplasia in the intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas. Annals Surg. 1997;226:491–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wada K. p16 and p53 gene alterations and accumulations in the malignant evolution of intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors of the pancreas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002;9:76–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Soldini D, Gugger M, Burckhardt E, et al. Progressive genomic alterations in intraductal papillary mucinous tumours of the pancreas and morphologically similar lesions of the pancreatic ducts. J Pathol. 2003;199:453–461.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Khalid A, Zahid M, Finkelstein S, et al. Pancreatic cyst fluid DNA analysis in evaluating pancreatic cysts: a report of the PANDA study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1098–1102.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schoedel K, Finkelstein S, Ohori N. K-ras and microsatellite marker analysis of fine-needle aspirates from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006;34:605–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ji B, Tsou L, Wand H, et al. Ras activity levels control the development of pancreatic diseases. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:1072–1082.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kopnin PB, Agapova LS, Kopnin BP, et al. Repression of sestrin family genes contributes to oncogenic Ras-induced reactive oxygen species up-regulation and genetic instability. Cancer Res. 2007;67:4671–4678.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Howard Mertz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mertz, H. K-ras Mutations Correlate with Atypical Cytology and Elevated CEA Levels in Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms. Dig Dis Sci 56, 2197–2201 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-010-1556-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-010-1556-z

Keywords

Navigation