Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Poorly Treated or Unrecognized GERD Reduces Quality of Life in Patients with COPD

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The effect of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in COPD has never been assessed.

Aim

To evaluate HRQL in patients with COPD alone compared with those with both COPD and continuing GERD symptoms.

Methods

A questionnaire-based, cross-sectional survey was performed. Subjects were recruited from the outpatient pulmonary clinics at the University of Florida Health Science Center/Jacksonville. Included patients had an established diagnosis of COPD. Exclusion criteria were respiratory disorders other than COPD, known esophageal disease, active peptic ulcer disease, Zollinger–Ellison syndrome, mastocytosis, scleroderma, and current alcohol abuse. Those meeting the criteria and agreeing to participate were asked to complete the Mayo Clinic GERQ and SF-36 questionnaires, by either personal or telephone interview. Clinically significant reflux was defined as heartburn and/or acid regurgitation weekly. Study patients were divided into two groups for HRQL analysis based on the GERQ response: COPD+/GERD+ and COPD only. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon T test for unequal variables and linear regression was performed using ANOVA. All data are expressed as mean and standard deviation.

Results

Eighty-six patients completed both questionnaires. Males were 55% and COPD+/GERD+ patients comprised 37% of the study group. Compared with COPD only, HRQL was reduced across all measures for the COPD+ GERD+ patients and achieved significance for bodily pain (P < 0.02), mental health (P < 0.05), and physical component score (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Patients with COPD and continuing GERD symptoms have reduced HRQL in comparison with those with COPD alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Revicki DA, Wood M, Maton PN, Sorensen S. The impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease on health-related quality of life. Am J Med. 1998;104:252–258.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dimenas E. Methodological aspects of evaluation of quality of life in upper gastrointestinal diseases. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1993;199:18–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Havelund T, Lind T, Wiklund I, et al. Quality of life in patients with heartburn but without esophagitis: effects of treatment with omeprazole. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:1723–1724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chal KL, Stacy JH, Sacks GE. The effect of ranitidine on symptom relief and quality of life of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Clin Pract. 1995;49:73–77.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stahl E, Lindberg A, Jansson SA, et al. Health related quality of life is related to COPD disease severity. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahler DA, Mackowiak JI. Evaluation of the short-form 36-item questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life in patients with COPD. Chest. 1995;107:1585–1589.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rascon-Aguilar IE, Pamer M, Wludyka P, et al. Role of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in exacerbations of COPD. Chest. 2006;130:1096–1101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. American Thoracic Society. Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991;144:1202–1218.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Colwell HH, Mathias SD, Pasta DJ, Henning JM, Hunt R. Development of a health related quality-of-life questionnaire for individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a validation study. Dig Dis Sci. 1999;44:1376–1383.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Locke GR III, Talley NJ, Fett SL, Zinsmiester AR, Melton LJ III. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:1448–1456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mokhlesi B, Morris AL, Huang CF, Curcio AJ, Barrett TA, Kamp DW. Increased prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in patients with COPD. Chest. 2001;119:1043–1048.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Casanova C, Baudet JS, del Valle Velasco M, Martin JM, Aguirre-Jaime A, de Torres JP, et al. Increased gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with severe COPD. Eur Respir J. 2004;23:841–845:14.

  14. Wong WM, Risner-Adler S, Beeler J, et al. Noncardiac chest pain: the role of the cardiologist: a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;39:858–862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Richter JE. Chest pain and gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;30:S39–S41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kahrilas PJ, Shaheen NJ, Vaezi MF, et al. American gastroenterological association medical position statement on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1383–1391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest exists for all authors of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth J. Vega.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rascon-Aguilar, I.E., Pamer, M., Wludyka, P. et al. Poorly Treated or Unrecognized GERD Reduces Quality of Life in Patients with COPD. Dig Dis Sci 56, 1976–1980 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-010-1542-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-010-1542-5

Keywords

Navigation