Skip to main content
Log in

Obese Patients Have Stronger Peristalsis and Increased Acid Exposure in the Esophagus

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Obesity is a risk factor for GERD and a potential modulator of esophageal motility.

Aim

To assess whether obese patients differ from non-obese patients in terms of esophageal motility and reflux.

Methods

Patients (n = 332) were categorized in GERD and controls after clinical assessment, esophageal manometry, and pH monitoring. Non-obese (BMI 16–29.9) and obese (BMI 30–68) were compared in regard of distal esophageal amplitude (DEA), LES pressure (LESP), manometric diagnosis, and esophageal acid exposure (EAE).

Results

Obese showed higher DEA in both controls (122 ± 53 vs. 97 ± 36 mmHg, p = 0.041) and GERD patients (109 ± 38 vs. 94 ± 46 mmHg, p < 0.001), higher LESP in GERD patients (20.5 ± 10.6 vs. 18.2 ± 10.6 mmHg, p = 0.049), higher frequency of nutcracker esophagus in controls (30 vs. 0%, p = 0.001), lower frequency of ineffective motility in GERD patients (6 vs. 20%, p = 0.001), and higher EAE in both controls [total EAE: 1.6% (0.7–5.1) vs. 0.9% (0.2–2.4), p = 0.027] and GERD patients [upright EAE: 6.5% (3.8–11.1) vs. 5.2% (1.5–10.6), p = 0.048]. Multiple linear regression showed that BMI was associated either with EAE (p < 0.001), DEA (p = 0.006), or LESP (in men, p = 0.007).

Conclusions

Obese patients differed from non-obese in terms of esophageal motility and reflux, regardless of the presence of GERD. Obese patients showed stronger peristalsis and increased acid exposure in the esophagus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hirano I, Richter JE. ACG practice guidelines: Esophageal reflux testing. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:668–685.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:209–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jamieson JR, Stein HJ, DeMeester TR, et al. Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: Normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992;87:1102–1111.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson LF, DeMeester TR. Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol. 1974;62:325–332.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Rice J, Clarke JO, Kwiatek MA, Kahrilas PJ. Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: A study of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:27–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Richter JE, Wu WC, Johns DN, et al. Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers. Variability of pressures with age and frequency of “abnormal” contractions. Dig Dis Sci. 1987;32:583–592.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Richter JE, Bradley LA, DeMeester TR, Wu WC. Normal 24-hr ambulatory esophageal pH values. Influence of study center, pH electrode, age, and gender. Dig Dis Sci. 1992;37:849–856.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Spechler SJ, Castell DO. Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities. Gut. 2001;49:145–151.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Smout AJ, Breedijk M, van der Zouw C, Akkermans LM. Physiological gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motor activity studied with a new system for 24-hour recording and automated analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 1989;34:372–378.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ogden CL, Yanovski SZ, Carroll MD, Flegal KM. The epidemiology of obesity. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2087–2102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kopelman PG. Obesity as a medical problem. Nature. 2000;404:635–643.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. El-Serag H. The association between obesity and GERD: A review of the epidemiological evidence. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:2307–2312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hampel H, Abraham NS, El-Serag HB. Meta-analysis: Obesity and the risk for gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:199–211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fass R. The pathophysiological mechanisms of GERD in the obese patient. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:2300–2306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pandolfino JE, El-Serag HB, Zhang Q, Shah N, Ghosh SK, Kahrilas PJ. Obesity: A challenge to esophagogastric junction integrity. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:639–649.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fornari F, Madalosso CA, Gurski RR. The role of gastro-esophageal pressure gradient on esophageal peristalsis in GERD patients (abstract). Gastroenterology. 2008;134:A-716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1900–1920.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. WHO Working Group. The problem of overweight and obesity. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;5–37.

  19. Velanovich V, Vallance SR, Gusz JR, Tapia FV, Harkabus MA. Quality of life scale for gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183:217–224.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fornari F, Gruber AC, Lopes AB, Cecchetti D, de Barros SG. Symptom’s questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Arq Gastroenterol. 2004;41:263–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fornari F, Madalosso CA, Farre R, Gurski RR, Thiesen V, Callegari-Jacques SM. The role of gastro-oesophageal pressure gradient and sliding hiatal hernia on pathological gastro-oesophageal reflux in severely obese patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;22:404–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Leite LP, Johnston BT, Barrett J, Castell JA, Castell DO. Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM): The primary finding in patients with nonspecific esophageal motility disorder. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42:1859–1865.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fornari F, Farre R, van Malenstein MH, Blondeau K, Callegari-Jacques SM, Barros SG. Nutcracker oesophagus: Association with chest pain and dysphagia controlling for gastro-oesophageal reflux. Dig Liver Dis. 2008;40:717–722.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wo JM, Castell DO. Exclusion of meal periods from ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring may improve diagnosis of esophageal acid reflux. Dig Dis Sci. 1994;39:1601–1607.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wiener GJ, Richter JE, Copper JB, Wu WC, Castell DO. The symptom index: A clinically important parameter of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol. 1988;83:358–361.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rieder F, Cheng L, Harnett KM, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease-associated esophagitis induces endogenous cytokine production leading to motor abnormalities. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:154–165.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kuper MA, Kramer KM, Kischniak A, et al. Dysfunction of the lower esophageal sphincter and dysmotility of the tubular esophagus in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1143–1149.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schneider JM, Brucher BL, Kuper M, Saemann K, Konigsrainer A, Schneider JH. Multichannel intraluminal impedance measurement of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with different stages of morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1522–1529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Zhang Q, Jarosz A, Shah N, Kahrilas PJ. Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high-resolution manometry: A study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290:G988–G997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Zhang Q, Jarosz A, Shah N, Kahrilas PJ. Quantifying EGJ morphology and relaxation with high-resolution manometry: A study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290:G1033–G1040.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sifrim D, Castell D, Dent J, Kahrilas PJ. Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: Review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux. Gut. 2004;53:1024–1031.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Fornari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fornari, F., Callegari-Jacques, S.M., Dantas, R.O. et al. Obese Patients Have Stronger Peristalsis and Increased Acid Exposure in the Esophagus. Dig Dis Sci 56, 1420–1426 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-010-1454-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-010-1454-4

Keywords

Navigation