Skip to main content

Prevalence of Silent Celiac Disease in Patients with Dyspepsia

Abstract

Celiac disease (CD) has become more common than in the past, although it frequently remains undetected for long periods of time. One reason for this is failure by health care professionals to recognize the variable clinical manifestations of CD and to perform the appropriate tests to make the diagnosis. Although dyspepsia may be part of a clinical spectrum in CD patients, there are scarce data about its prevalence in silent CD. We aimed to determine the prevalence of CD in otherwise healthy dyspeptic patients by means of serologic screening followed by endoscopic biopsies if appropriate. Anti-endomysium antibody assay was positive in 3 of 196 patients. All 3 were female, ages ranged from 19–52 years (mean ± SD age, 36±16 years). Duodenal biopsies were compatible with CD in all, whereas abnormal endoscopic findings were noted in 2. Therefore, a 1.5% prevalence of CD was observed in this study group. The odds ratio for CD was 2.57 (95% confidence interval) in comparison with the general population. CD should be kept in mind as a cause of dyspepsia during clinical activities. The association between these 2 conditions is, at most, weak, but a gluten-free diet may still bring symptomatic relief for dyspeptic symptoms in CD. During endoscopic examination for dyspepsia, if indicated, endoscopists should carefully inspect the duodenum for CD findings. Although routine serologic screening can not be recommended, it may be appropriate for the patients with refractory dyspepsia, especially females.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Farrell RJ, Kelly CP (2002) Celiac sprue. N Engl J Med 346:180–188

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Feighery C (1999) Celiac disease. Br Med J 319:236–239

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Midhagen G, Jarnerot G, Kraaz W (1988) Adult celiac disease within a defined geographical area in Sweden. A study of prevalence and associated diseases. Scand J Gastroenterol 23:1000–1004

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Catassi C, Fabiani E, Rästch IM, Coppa GV, Giorgi PL, Pierdomenico R, Alessandrini S, Iwanejko G, Domenici R, Mei E, Miano A, Marani M, Bottaro G, Spina M, Dotti M, Montanelli A, Barbato M, Viola F, Lazzari R, Vallini M, Guariso G, Plebani M, Cataldo F, Traverso G, Ventura A, et al (1996) The coeliac iceberg in Italy. A multicentre antigliadin antibodies screening for coeliac disease in school-age subjects. Acta Paediatr 412:29–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Catassi C, Rätsch IM, Fabiani E, Rossini M, Bordicchia F, Candela F, Coppa GV, Giorgi PL (1994) Celiac disease in the year 2000: exploring the iceberg. Lancet 343:200–2003

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Not T, Horvath K, Hill ID, Partanen J, Hammed A, Magazzu Fasano A (1998) Celiac disease risk in the USA: high prevalence of antiendomysium antibodies in healthy blood donors. Scand J Gastroenterol 33:494–498

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Karaaslan H, Bektaş M, Bozkaya H, Soykan I, Bahar K, Ozden A (2003) Seroprevalence of celiac disease in healthy blood donors. 20th national gastroenterology week. Turk J Gastroenterol 573A:18

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tatar G, Elsurer R, Simsek H, Balaban Y, Hascelik G, Ozcebe O, Buyukasık Y, Sokmensuer C (2004) Screening of tissue transglutaminase antibody in healthy blood donors for celiac disease screening in the Turkish population. Dig Dis Sci 49:1479–1484

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Farrell RJ, Kelly CP (2002) Celiac sprue. N Engl J Med 346:180–188

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bardella MT, Minoli G, Ravizza D, Radaelli F, Velio P, Quatrini M, Bianchi PA, Conte D (2000) Increased prevalence of celiac disease in patients with dyspepsia. Arch Intern Med 160:1489–1491

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vivas S, Ruiz de Morales JM, Martinez J, Gonzalez MC, Martin S, Martin J, Cechini C, Olcoz JL (2003) Human recombinant anti-transglutaminase antibody testing is useful in the diagnosis of silent coeliac disease in a selected group of at-risk patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 15:479–483

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lima MV, Gandolfi L, Pires J, Pratesi R (2005) Prevalence of celiac disease in dyspeptic patients. Arq Gastroenterol 42:153–156

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Locke GR, Murray JA, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ, Talley NJ (2004) Celiac disease serology in irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia: a population-based case-control study. Mayo Clin Proc 79:476–482

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Talley NJ, Stanghellini V, Heading RC, Koch KL, Malagelada JR, Tytgat GNJ (1999) Functional gastroduodenal disorders. Gut 45:37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dickey W, Hughes D (1999) Prevalence of celiac disease and its endoscopic markers among patients having routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 94:2182–2186

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Marsh MN (1992) Luten, major histocompatibility, and the small intestine. Gastroenterology 102:330–354

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Green PHR (2005) The many faces of celiac disease: clinical presentation of celiac disease in the adult population. Gastroenterology 128:74–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lo W, Sano K, Lebwohl B, Diamond B, Green PH (2003) Changing presentation of adult celiac disease. Dig Dis Sci 48:395–398

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dewar DH, Ciclitira PJ (2005) Clinical features and diagnosis of celiac disease. Gastroenterol 128:19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rostami K, Kerckhaert J, Blomberg BME, Meijer JWR, Mulder CJJ (1999) Sensitivity of antiendomysium and antigliadin antibodies in untreated celiacs: disappointing in clinical practice. Am J Gastroenterol 94:888–894

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanders DS, Azmy IAF (2004) Celiac disease serology and irritable bowel syndrome: does the relationship merit further evaluation? Mayo Clin Proc 79:1209–1210

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dickey W, Hughes D (2004) Erosions in the second part of the duodenum in patients with villous atrophy. Gastrointest Endosc 59:116–118

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dickey W, Hughes D (2001) Disappointing sensitivity of endoscopic markers for villous atrophy in a high-risk population: implications for celiac disease diagnosis during routine endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 96:2126–2128

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee SK, Green PH (2005) Endoscopy in celiac disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 21:589–594

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shah VH, Rotterdam H, Kotler DP, Fasano A, Green PHR (2000) All that scallops is not celiac disease. Gastrointest Endosc 51:717–720

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Collin P (2005) Should adults be screened for celiac disease? What are the benefits and harms of screening? Gastroenterology 128:104–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Spiegel BM, Derosa VP, Gralnek IM, Wang V, Dulai GS (2004) Testing for celiac sprue in irritable bowel syndrome with predominant diarrhea: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gastroenterol 126:1721–1732

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ersan Özaslan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Özaslan, E., Akkorlu, S., Eskioğlu, E. et al. Prevalence of Silent Celiac Disease in Patients with Dyspepsia. Dig Dis Sci 52, 692–697 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-9453-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-9453-1

Keywords

  • Celiac disease
  • Silent
  • Dyspepsia
  • Prevalence