Abstract
We examined the esophageal structure in children who underwent traction to achieve primary repair of long-gap esophageal atresia. High-resolution ultrasound was used to compare thickness of the proximal and distal esophagus in children who had traction to achieve primary repair (n=15) to cases of esophageal atresia with shorter gaps that did not require traction (n=8). The muscularis propria of the upper esophagus was thicker in the traction compared to the non-traction group, though not statistically significant (respectively, 0.79 (0.18) mm vs. 0.71 (0.16) mm; p=0.29), measurements were similar for the lower esophagus (respectively, 0.79 (0.21) mm vs. 0.75 (0.13) mm; p=0.64). Combined mucosa and submucosa was very similar in both groups for the upper (respectively, 1.03 (0.15) mm vs. 1.04 (0.16) mm; p=0.95) and lower esophagus (respectively, 1.09 (0.23) mm vs. 1.01 (0.13) mm; p=0.37). The thickness of individual mural layers is maintained after increasing esophageal length with traction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Forrester MB, Merz RD (2005) Epidemiology of oesophageal atresia and tracheooesophageal fistula in Hawaii, 1986–2000. Public Health 119(6):483–488
Foker JE, Kendall TC, Catton K, Khan K (2005) A flexible approach to achieve a true primary repair for all infants with esophageal atresia. Semin Pediatr Surg 14(1):8–15
Foker J, Linden B, Boyle E, Marquardt C (1997) Development of a true primary repair for the full spectrum of esophageal atresia. Ann Surg 226:543–53
Hirschl RB, Yardeni D, Oldham K, Sherman N, Siplovich L, Gross E, Udassin R, Cohen Z, Nagar H, Geiger JD, Coran AG (2002) Gastric transposition for esophageal replacement in children: experience with 41 consecutive cases with special emphasis on esophageal atresia. Ann Surg 236(4):531–539
Otte J, Gianello F, Wese D, Claus D, Verellen G, Moulin D (1984) Diverticulum formation after circular myotomy for esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 19:68–71
Al-Qahtani AR, Yazbeck S, Rosen NG, Youssef S, Mayer SK (2003) Lengthening technique for long-gap esophageal atresia and early anastomosis. J Pediatr Surg 38(5):737–739
Schiano TD, Fisher RS, Parkman HP, Cohen S, Dabezies M, Miller LS (1996) Use of high-resolution endoscopic ultrasonography to assess esophageal wall damage after pneumatic dilation and botulinum toxin injection to treat achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc 44:151–157
Fox VL, Nurko S, Teitelbaum JE, Badizadegan K, Furuta GT (2003) High-resolution EUS in children with eosinophilic “allergic” esophagitis. Gastrointest Endosc 57(1):30–36
Hasegawa N, Niwa Y, Arisawa T, Hase S, Goto H, Hayakawa T (1996) Preoperative staging of superficial esophageal carcinoma: comparison of an ultrasound probe and standard endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastrointest Endosc 44:388–393
Lindahl H, Louhimo I (1987) Livaditis myotomy in long-gap esophageal atresia. J Ped Surg 22:109–12
Ricketts R, Luck S, Raffensperger J (1981) Circular esophagomyotomy for primary repair of long-gap esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 16:365
Kimura K, Nishijima E, Tsugawa C, Collins DL, Lazar EL, Stylianos S, Sandler A, Soper RT (2001) Multistaged extrathoracic esophageal elongation procedure for long-gap esophageal atresia: experience with 12 patients. J Pediatr Surg 36:1725–1727
Lindahl H, Rintala R (1995) Long-term complications in cases of isolated esophageal atresia treated with esophageal anastomosis. J Pediatr Surg 30(8):1222–1223
Miller LS, Liu JB, Collizzo FP, Ter H, Marzano J, Barbarevech C, Helwig K, Leung L, Goldberg BB (1995) Correlation of high-frequency esophageal ultrasonography and manometry in the study of esophageal motility. Gastroenterology 109:832–837
Printz H, Schlenzka R, Requadt P, Tscherny M, Wagner AC, Eissele R, Rothmund M, Arnold R, Goke B (1997) Small-bowel lengthening by mechanical distraction. Digestion 58(3):240–248
Park J, Puapong DP, Wu BM, Atkinson JB, Dunn JC (2004) Enterogenesis by mechanical lengthening: morphology and function of the lengthened small intestine. J Pediatr Surg 39(12):1823–1827
Maeda K, Hisamatsu C, Hasegawa T, Tanaka H, Okita Y (2004) Circular myectomy for the treatment of congenital esophageal stenosis owing to tracheobronchial remnant. J Pediatr Surg 39(12):1765–1768
Usui N, Kamata S, Kawahara H, Sawai T, Nakajima K, Soh H, Okada A (2002) Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of congenital esophageal stenosis. J Pediatr Surg 37(12):1744–1746
Kouchi K, Yoshida H, Matsunaga T, Ohtsuka Y, Nagatake E, Satoh Y, Terui K, Mitsunaga T, Ochiai T, Arima M, Ohnuma N (2002) Endosonographic evaluation in two children with esophageal stenosis. J Pediatr Surg 37(6):934–936
Kamijo Y, Kondo I, Kokuto M, Kataoka Y, Soma K (2004) Miniprobe ultrasonography for determining prognosis in corrosive esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol 99(5):851–854
Caletti GC, Ferarri A, Mattioli S, Zannoli R, Di Simone MP, Bocus P, Gozetti G, Barbara L (1994) Endoscopy versus endoscopic ultrasonography in staging reflux esophagitis. Endoscopy 26:794–797
Kawamura O, Sekiguchi T, Kusano M, Horikoshi T, Kikuchi K, Miyazaki M, Yamada M, Ohwada T (1995) Endoscopic ultrasonographic abnormalities and lower esophageal sphincter function in reflux esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci 40:598–605
Taniguchi DK, Martin RW, Trowers EA, Dennis MB Jr, Odegaard S, Silverstein FE (1993) Changes in esophageal wall layers during motility: measurements with a new miniature ultrasound suction device. Gastrointest Endosc 39:146–152
Yanai H, Fujimura H, Suzumi M, Matsuura S, Awaya N, Noguchi T, Karita M, Tada M, Okita K, Aibe T (1993) Delineation of the gastric muscularis mucosae and assessment of depth of invasion of early gastric cancer using a 20-megahertz endoscopic ultrasound probe. Gastrointest Endosc 39:505–512
Acknowledgements
S. Mallery and R. Lai for help with examination of endoscopic ultrasound images.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khan, K.M., Sabati, A.A., Kendall, T. et al. The Effect of Traction on Esophageal Structure in Children with Long-Gap Esophageal Atresia. Dig Dis Sci 51, 1917–1921 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-9169-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-9169-2