Less Irritative Action of Wine and Japanese Sake in Rat Stomachs: A Comparative Study with Ethanol
- 79 Downloads
The ingestion of alcohol, especially in excess, causes acute gastric lesions and gastritis in humans, yet the mucosal irritative action of alcoholic beverages remains largely unknown. We examined the mucosal irritative action of whiskey, wine and Japanese sake in the rat stomach both ex vivo and in vitro, in comparison with ethanol. Under urethane anesthesia, a rat stomach was mounted in an ex vivo chamber, then superfused with saline, and the transmucosal potential difference (PD) was measured. After the basal PD had stabilized, the mucosa was exposed for 30 min to 2 ml of 15% ethanol, whiskey (containing 15% ethanol), white wine, or Japanese sake (the ethanol concentration of the latter two is 12–15%). In the in vitro study, rat epithelial cells (RGM1) were treated with the alcoholic beverages for 5 min, and the cell viability was determined with crystal violet. Ethanol or whiskey applied to the chamber caused a decrease in PD, while wine or Japanese sake did not. Histologically, surface epithelial damage was observed after exposure to both ethanol and whiskey, yet no damage was induced by white wine and Japanese sake. Likewise, both ethanol and whiskey markedly reduced the viability of RGM1 cells after 5 min of incubation, while neither white wine nor Japanese sake had any effect. In addition, supplementation of glucose significantly prevented the reduction in both PD and cell viability caused by ethanol. These results suggest that the mucosal irritative action of Japanese sake and white wine is much less pronounced than that of ethanol or whiskey and that the less damaging action of Japanese sake and white wine may be, at least partly, accounted for by the glucose contained in these alcoholic beverages.
Key Wordsstomach mucosal irritative action ethanol alcoholic beverage nonalcoholic component glucose
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Davenport HW: Ethanol damage to canine oxyntic glandular mucosa. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 126:657–667, 1967Google Scholar
- 9.Takizawa Y: Health-positive effects of the “Sake” of Japan. Food Ingredients 208:905–965, 2003Google Scholar
- 12.Robert A, Nezamis JE, Lancaster C, Hanchar AJ: Cytoprotection by prostaglandins in rats. Prevention of gastric necrosis produced by alcohol, HCl, NaOH, hypertonic NaCl, and thermal injury. Gastroenterology 77:433–443, 1979Google Scholar
- 15.Yamamoto H, Hirata T, Araki H, Kunikata T, Kato S, Takeuchi K: Inducible types of cyclooxygenase and nitric oxide synthase in adaptive cytoprotection in rat stomachs. J Physiol (Paris) 93:405–412, 1999Google Scholar
- 17.Mobarok Ali AT, al-Swayeh OA: Natural honey prevents ethanol–induced increased vascular permeability changes in the rat stomach. J Ethnopharmacol 55:231–238, 1997Google Scholar
- 21.Nakamura K, Rokutan K, Marui N, Aoike A, Kawai K: Induction of heat shock proteins and their implication in protection against ethanol-induced damage in cultured guinea pig gastric mucosal cells. Gastroenterology 101:161–166, 1994Google Scholar