Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 49, Issue 11–12, pp 1862–1867 | Cite as

Calcium Carbonate Antacids Alter Esophageal Motility in Heartburn Sufferers

  • Sheila Rodriguez-StanleyEmail author
  • Tanveer Ahmed
  • Sattar Zubaidi
  • Susan Riley
  • Hamid I. Akbarali
  • Mark H. Mellow
  • Philip B. Miner


Chewed calcium carbonate (CaCO3) rapidly neutralizes esophageal acid and may prevent reflux, suggesting another mechanism of action independent of acid neutralization. Calcium is essential for muscle tone. Our aim was to determine if luminal calcium released from chewed antacids improved esophageal motor function in heartburn sufferers. Esophageal manometry and acid clearance (swallows and time to raise esophageal pH to 5 after a 15-ml 0.1 N HCl bolus) were performed in 18 heartburn sufferers before and after chewing two Tums EX (1500 mg CaCO3, 600 mg calcium). Subjects with hypertensive esophageal contractions or hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) were excluded. Subjects with normal to low LESP were included. Differences between parameters were determined by two-tailed paired t-tests, P &< 0.05. Proximal esophageal contractile amplitude was significantly increased after CaCO3 (47.18 vs 52.97 mm Hg; P = 0.02), distal onset velocity was significantly decreased after CaCO3 (4.34 vs 3.71 cm/sec; P = 0.02), and acid clearance was significantly increased 30 min after CaCO3 (20.35 vs 11.7 swallows, [P &< 0.005] and 12.19 vs 6.29 min [P &< 0.007]). LESP was not altered after CaCO3 (22.70 vs 23.79 mm Hg; P = 0.551), however, LESP increased in 9 of 18 subjects. Depth of LES relaxation, medial and distal esophageal contractile amplitude, and duration of contractions were not altered by CaCO3. CaCO3 did not alter salivary secretion and pH in a subset of these subjects, and CaCO3 with secreted saliva did not neutralize a 15-ml acid bolus. The Ca2+ released after chewing of CaCO3 antacids may be partially responsible for the reduction of heartburn by significantly improving initiation of peristalsis and acid clearance.

calcium carbonate reflux heartburn esophageal peristalsis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Orlando RC: The pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease: The relationship between epithelial defense, dysmotility and acid exposure. Am J Gastroenterol 92(4):3s–7s, 1997PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kahrilas PJ: GERD revisited: Advances in pathogenesis. Hepatogastroenterology 45(23):1301–1307, 1998PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chelikani S, Robinson M, Maton PN, Rodriguez S: Comparison of tablet and liquid antacids on acidity in the esophagus and stomach. Am J Gastroenterol 90(9):1570, 1995Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Collings KL, Rodriguez-Stanley S, Proskin HM, Robinson M, Miner PB Jr: Clinical effectiveness of a new antacid chewing gum on heartburn and oesophageal pH control. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 16(12):2029–2035, 2002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Decktor D, Robinson M, Maton P, Lanza F: Effects of aluminum/magnesium hydroxide and calcium carbonate on esophageal and gastric pH in subjects with heartburn. Am J Ther 40(2):546–552, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Robinson M, Rodriguez-Stanley S, Miner PB, McGuire AJ, Fung K, Ciociola AA: Effects of antacid formulation on postprandial oesophageal acidity in patients with a history of episodic heartburn. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 16(3):435–443, 2002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fox JET, Daniel EE: Role of Ca2+ in genesis of lower esophageal sphincter tone and other active contraction. Am J Physiol 6:E163–E171, 1979Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Biancani P, Hillemeier C, Bitar KN, Makhlouf GM: Contraction mediated by Ca2+ influx in esophageal muscle and by Ca2+ release in the LES. Am J Physiol 253:G760–G766, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Allescher HD, Berezin I, Jury J, Daniel EE: Characteristics of canine lower esophageal sphincter: A new electrophysiological tool. Am J Physiol 255:G441–G453, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Salapatek AM, Lam A, Daniel EE: Calcium source diversity in canine lower esophageal sphincter muscle. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 287(1):98–106, 1998PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tottrup A, Forman A, Uldbjerg N, Funch-Jensen P, Andersson KE: Mechanical properties of isolated human esophageal smooth muscle. Am J Physiol 258:G338–G344, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Konrad-Dalhoff I, Baunack AR, Ramsch KD, Ahr G, Kraft H, Schmitz H, Weihrauch TR, Kuhlmann J: Effect of the calcium antagonists nifedipine, nitrendipine, nimodipine and nisoldipine on esophageal motility in man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 41(4):313–316, 1991CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Richter JE, Spurling TJ, Cordova CM, Castell DO: Effects of oral calcium blocker, diltiazem, on esophageal contractions. Studies in volunteers and patients with nutcracker esophagus. Dig Dis Sci 29(7):649–656, 1984CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Booth DJ, Kemmerer WT, Skinner DB: Acid clearing from the distal esophagus. Arch Surg 96:731–734, 1968CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fordtran JS, Morawski SG, Richardson CT: In vivo and in vitro evaluation of liquid antacids. N Engl J Med 288(18):923–928, 1973CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Graham DY, Patterson DJ: Double-blind comparison of liquid antacid and placebo in the treatment of reflux esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci 28(6):559–563, 1983CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Decktor D, Robinson M, Gottlieb S: Comparative effects of liquid antacids on esophageal and gastric pH in patients with heartburn. Am J Ther 2:481–486, 1995CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Crist J, Gidda JS, Goyal RK: Intramural mechanism of esophageal peristalsis: Roles of cholinergic and noncholinergic nerves. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:3595–3599, 1984CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jury J, Jager LP, Daniel EE: Unusual potassium channels mediate nonadrenergic noncholinergic nerve-mediated inhibition in opossum esophagus. Can J Physiol Pharm 63(2):107–112, 1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Crist JR, He XD, Goyal RK: Chloride-mediated inhibitory junction potentials in opossum esophageal circular smooth muscle. Am J Physiol 261:G752–G762, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Castell DO, Levine MC: Lower esophageal sphincter response to gastric alkalinization. Ann Intern Med 74(2):223–227, 1971CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Higgs RH, Smyth RD, Castell DO: Gastric alkalinization. N Engl J Med 291:486–490, 1974CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fromner DJ: Measurement of gastroesophageal reflux after antacid administration using a perfusion technique. Curr Med Res Opin 7(7):452–457, 1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rogers AI, Rothman C, perez C, Arostegui M: Postprandial antacids do not elevate lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) in man. Gastroenterology 74:1142, 1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Danielides IC, Mellow MH: Effect of acute hypercalcemia on human esophageal motility. Gastroenterology 75(6):1115–1119, 1978CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dagher EI, Rifley WJ, Little AG: Calcium effects on human esophageal smooth and striated muscle. J Surg Res 55(3):304–306, 1993CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shi G, Pandolfino JE, Joehl RJ, Brasseur JG, Kahrilas PJ: Distinct patterns of oesophageal shortening during primary peristalsis, secondary peristalsis and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. Neurogastroenterol Motil 14(5):505–512, 2002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheila Rodriguez-Stanley
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tanveer Ahmed
    • 1
  • Sattar Zubaidi
    • 1
  • Susan Riley
    • 1
  • Hamid I. Akbarali
    • 2
  • Mark H. Mellow
    • 3
  • Philip B. Miner
    • 1
  1. 1.Oklahoma Foundation for Digestive ResearchOklahoma City
  2. 2.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of Oklahoma Health Science CenterOklahoma City
  3. 3.Digestive Disease Specialists, Inc.Oklahoma CityUSA

Personalised recommendations