Correction to: Clinical Social Work Journal https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-019-00715-1
The original version of the article unfortunately contained an error in a couple of sentences. In ‘Personal Views and Experiences’ section, percentage value ‘98’ is missing in the sentence ‘Nearly all of participants (* %) said that they thought of solutions to reach their hoped-for goals, agreeing or strongly agreeing with the statement: “When I have faced difficulties that couldn’t be solved right then, I thought of solution for the future.” and it should read as below.
Nearly all of participants (98%) said that they thought of solutions to reach their hoped-for goals, agreeing or strongly agreeing with the statement: “When I have faced difficulties that couldn’t be solved right then, I thought of solution for the future.”
In ‘Hope in Personal Beliefs and Values’ section, ‘Positive Outlook’ subsection, the sentence ‘Some participants though of hopefulness as part of a positive outlook.’ should read ‘Some participants thought of hopefulness as part of a positive outlook’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruden, M.H. Correction to: A Call for Hope-Centered Work: A Preliminary Study of Oncology Social Workers’ Perceptions of the Role and Value of Hope at End-of-Life. Clin Soc Work J 47, 308 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-019-00717-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-019-00717-z