Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is It Conflict or Abuse? A Practice Note for Furthering Differential Assessment and Response

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This practice note uses over 20 years of experience as domestic violence advocates to argue that the domestic violence field is not adequately distinguishing escalated conflict from abuse. In spite of a long-standing domestic violence paradigm based on an analysis of power and control, there is an overemphasis on violent behaviors and an underemphasis on power and control dynamics, absent physical violence. The authors contend that abuse and escalated conflict are different, but often conflated. Furthering differential assessments would allow better responses to both the needs of abuse survivors, as well as those whose relationships are in escalated conflict. This practice note overviews the limitations, proposes a shift in thinking that highlights three possible power dynamics within relationships (power-sharing, power-struggling, or power-over), and offers implications for practice and research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651–680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Asheran, K. L. (n.d.). Some thoughts on the myth of mutual abuse. Retrieved May 22, 2017 from http://www.vawnet.org/Assoc_Files_VAWnet/ThoughtsonMutualAbuse.pdf.

  • Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023–1053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boston Women’s Health Book Collective. (2011). Our bodies, ourselves. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (1998). Measuring the extent of woman abuse in intimate heterosexual relationships: A critique of the Conflict Tactics Scales. VAWnet Applied Research Forum.

  • Dutton, M. A., Goodman, L., & Schmidt, R. J. (2006). Development and validation of a coercive control measure for intimate partner violence: Final technical report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiebert, M. S. (2010). References examining assaults by women on their spouses or male partners: An annotated bibliography. Sexuality & Culture, 14(1), 49–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, N., Laughon, K., Campbell, J., Wolf Chair, A. D., Block, C. R., Hanson, G., Sharps, P. W., & Taliaferro, E. (2009). Non-fatal strangulation is an important risk factor for homicide of women. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 35(3), 329–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham-Kevan, N. (2007). Domestic violence: Research and implications for batterer prgrammes in Europe. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 13, 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartney, C., & Vuong, L. (2009). Created equal: Racial and ethnic disparities in the US criminal justice system. New York: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (2005). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57(2), 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance and situational couple violence. Lebanon, NH: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. V. (1985). The meaning of mutuality. Paper presented at a Stone Center Colloquium on December 4.

  • Lehrner, A., & Allen, N. E. (2009). Still a movement after all these years? Current tensions in the domestic violence movement. Violence Against Women, 15(6), 656–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209332185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loseke, D. R., & Kurz, D. (2005). Men’s violence toward women is the serious social problem. In D. R. Loseke, R. J. Gelles & M. M. Cavanaugh (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (79–95). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, L., & Tice, K. W. (2002). Paradoxes of professionalization: Parallel dilemmas in women’s organizations in the Americas. Gender & Society, 16(6), 941–958. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124302237896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennicke, A., & Kulkarni, S. (2016). Understanding gender symmetry within an expanded partner violence typology. Special Issue of Journal of Family Violence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9867-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messing, J. T., Campbell, J., Sullivan Wilson, J., Brown, S., Patchell, B., & Shall, C. (2014). Police departments’ use of the lethality assessment program: A quasi-experimental evaluation. U.S. Department of Justice: Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Network to End Domestic Violence. (2012). Am I being abused? A checklist. Retrieved May 22, 2017 from http://www.womenslaw.org/simple.php?sitemap_id=38.

  • New York State LGBTQ Intimate Partner Violence Network. (2017). Power and control in relationships: An assessment tool. New York: The Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1992). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth Model. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, R. A., & Simpson, S. S. (2012). Self-protective behaviors and injury in domestic violence situations: Does it hurt to fight back? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(17), 3345–3365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richie, B. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of battered Black women. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richie, B. (2012). Arrested justice: Black women, violence and America’s prison nation. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Northwest Network of Bisexual, Trans, and Lesbian Survivors of Abuse. (2005). Assessment tool. Seattle, WA: NW Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, K. (1982). The battered women movement and the creation of the wife beating problem. Social Problems, 29(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.2307/800155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Justice. (2015). What is domestic violence? Retrieved May 22, 2017 from https://www.justice.gov/ovw/domestic-violence.

  • Velonis, A. J. (2016). “He never did anything you typically think of as abuse”: Experiences with violence in controlling and non-controlling relationships in a non-agency sample of women. Violence Against Women, 22, 1031–1054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White House. (2016). Factsheet: The violence against women act. Retrieved May 22, 2017 from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/vawa_factsheet.pdf.

  • Wies, J. (2008). Professionalizing human services: A case of domestic violence shelter advocates. Human Organization, 67(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.67.2.l43m2v54221711l3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annelise Mennicke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hodes, C., Mennicke, A. Is It Conflict or Abuse? A Practice Note for Furthering Differential Assessment and Response. Clin Soc Work J 47, 176–184 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-018-0655-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-018-0655-8

Keywords

Navigation