Skip to main content
Log in

Clinicians’ Reverie as Private Enactments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces a concept the authors refer to as private enactments. While the majority of the relational literature has focused on the more dramatic enactments in treatment, private enactments emerge as the therapist becomes aware through reveries and personal associations that she is facing a parallel struggle with the patient, one shaped by the unfolding relational unconscious cocreated in treatment. These moments are private in the sense that the therapist experiences them internally after a period of sustained, often confusing private reflection during moments of clinical impasse. The authors elucidate this process with two cases with traumatized patients that highlight how the eventual resolution of private enactments offered new perspective on the clinical stalemate, novel understanding that evolved into constructive interventions after both authors became aware of shared, dissociated conflicts involving threads of trauma and loss, leading further to mutual reparation. Far from being dramatic moments acted out between therapist and patient, or far from simply involving unresolved emotional conflicts in the therapist, the cases of help illustrate how these subtle, often unnoticed musings operating sub rosa can highlight a shared, cocreated struggle that if identified can provide new insight and relief from impasse, so that we change as our patients change by metabolizing our private associations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of the minds: Mutual influence in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, A. (2014). Three pleas for a measure of uncertainty, reverie, and private contemplation in the chaotic, interactive, nonlinear dynamic field of interpersonal/intersubjective relational psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 24, 663–675. doi:10.1080/10481885.2014.970967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollas, C. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromberg, P. M. (1998). Standing in the spaces: Essays on clinical process, trauma, & dissociation. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buechler, S. (2008). Making a difference in patients’ lives: Emotional experience in the therapeutic setting. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S. (2014). The things we carry: Finding/creating the object and the analyst’s self-reflective participation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 24, 621–636. doi:10.1080/10481885.2014.970963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, K. (2014). The analyst’s private space: Spontaneity, ritual, psychotherapeutic action, and self-care. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 24, 637–647. doi:10.1080/10481885.2014.970964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. M. (2004). Whose bad objects are we anyway? Repetition and our elusive love affair with evil. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 14, 711–732. doi:10.1080/10481881409348802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. M., & Frawley, M. G. (1994). Treating the adult survivor of childhood sexual abuse: A psychoanalytic perspective. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faimberg, H. (2005). The telescoping of generations: Listening to the narcissistic links between generations. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1958). Remembering, repeating and working through. In J. Strachey (Ed. &amp, Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 12, pp. 145–163). London, UK: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganzer, C. (2013). Variations from the frame. Clinical Social Work Journal, 41, 57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, S. (2004). The relational unconscious: A core element of intersubjectivity, thirdness, and clinical process. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 63–98. doi:10.1002/j.2167-4086.2004.tb00153.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2009). “You Must Remember This”. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19, 2–21. doi:10.1080/10481880802634537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2014). Introduction. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 24, 615–620. doi:10.1080/10481885.2014.970962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, I. Z. (1983). The patient as interpreter of the analyst’s experience. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 25, 169–211. doi:10.1080/00107530.1983.10746615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, I. Z. (1998). Ritual and spontaneity in psychoanalytic process: A dialectical-constructivist view. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewald, H. W. (1980). Papers on psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis: An integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A. (1995). Hope and dread in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A. (2003). Relationality: From attachment to intersubjectivity. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, T. H. (1994). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 75, 3–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, T.H. (1997). Reverie and metaphor: Some thoughts on how I work as a psychoanalyst. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 78, 719–732.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, T. H. (2004). The analytic third: Implications for psychoanalytic theory and technique. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 167–195. doi:10.1002/j.2167-4086.2004.tb00156.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, S. (2014). Paying attention and feeling puzzled: The analytic mindset as an agent of therapeutic change. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 24, 248–662. doi:10.1080/10481885.2014.970966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. B. (1997). Unformulated experience: From dissociation to imagination in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. B. (2010). Partners in thought: Working with unformulated experience, dissociation, and enactment. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damon Krohn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krohn, D., Ganzer, C. Clinicians’ Reverie as Private Enactments. Clin Soc Work J 46, 8–17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-017-0617-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-017-0617-6

Keywords

Navigation